Petition to Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Michelle Guthrie
ABC: host a debate between Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Yassmin Abdul-Magied regarding Islam
On February 13th, during an episode of the taxpayer-funded ABC's flagship current affairs program Q&A, invited guest and ABC contributor Yassmin Abdul-Magied became involved in a heated exchange with Tasmanian Senator, Jacqui Lambie. During the discussion, Ms Abdul-Magied argued that Islam is a feminist religion while defending the implementation of Sharia in Australia. After widespread condemnation of her comments, Ms Abdel-Magied sought advice from anti-LGBT and anti-woman Islamist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesman, Wassim Doureihi on his private Facebook page. Mr Doureihi criticised Ms Abdel-Magied for her inability to argue Islamic doctrine forcefully and stated that her defence of Sharia was problematic. In response, Ms Abdel-Magied replied: "What specifically was problematic and how can I do better in the future inshallah? I am young, (sic) and willing to learn, inshallah. Trying to do the best with the platform I can, Allah willing.” Mr Doureihi continued that Ms Abdel-Magied had “ended up framing Islam through a secular lens, aimed at a secular people and conscious of the presence of a secular government.” Mr Doureighi then suggested that they continue their conversation in a private message thread. Following the broadcast of the original episode of Q&A, ABC has been targeted with a petition on Change.org by Muslim leaders. "Whilst you may view last night as an opportunity to boost ratings at the expense of fairness and respect to panelists, and members of minority communities, we view the bullying that occurred on last night's TV show as a clear example of further deterrence for Muslim youth to engage in public platforms,” the petition reads. "We demand an apology from Q&A for its poor handling of the debate and for its failure to uphold its values of respect and integrity." In response, a counter petition was started calling on the ABC to condemn and sack Ms Abdel-Magied. We don’t believe that anyone should be fired for exercising their freedom of speech, but we do believe that in a free and open society, ideas should be challenged in as large a forum as possible. Ayaan Hirsi Ali is an outspoken critic of Islam, and in particular, the treatment of women, children and sexual minorities under Sharia. Born in Somalia to devoutly Muslim parents, Hirsi Ali was subjected to female genital mutilation as a child and escaped an arranged marriage in 1992 when she was granted asylum in the Netherlands. Fleeing Europe after the execution-style murder of her friend and colleague Theo van Gogh and explicit threats made against her by Muslim extremists, Hirsi Ali has nevertheless continued her work advocating for the rights of minority groups threatened by the implementation of Sharia around the world. Ms Abdul-Magied is entirely free to express her own opinion about feminism and Islam. We feel it is appropriate, however, that these views are challenged in a public forum by someone more knowledgable, and whose understanding of these issues more nuanced than those of Senator Lambie. Ayaan Hirsi Ali will be visiting Australia during the first two weeks of April as part of her speaking tour. We ask that the ABC host a debate between Yassmin Abdul-Magied and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, on the specific merits or not of Sharia and Islamic doctrine in relation to women’s rights.
Petition to Anitere Flores, Holly Raschein, Jose Rodriguez, Jose Diaz, David Richardson, Robert Asencio, Bryan Avila, Daisy Baez, Michael Bileca, Manny Diaz, Bobby DuBose, Nicholas Duran, Katie Edwards, Joseph Geller, Roy Hardemon, Kristin Jacobs, Evan Jenne, Shevrin Jones, Kionne McGhee, George Moraitis, Jared Moskowitz, Jeanette Nunez, Jose Oliva, Sharon Pritchett, Barrington Russell, Cynthia Stafford, Richard Stark, Carlos Trujillo, Barbara Watson, Frank Artiles, Lauren Book, Daphne Campbell, Gary Farmer, Rene Garcia, Perry Thurston
Don’t store nuclear waste near our drinking water source.
The drinking water we depend on should be protected from Nuclear contamination. If Florida Power and Light (FPL) has its way, they will be storing radioactive carcinogens below Florida’s Biscayne Aquifer. The Biscayne Aquifer is the primary source of drinking water for millions of people in South Florida. We must stop this dangerous project before it begins. Here’s why: A 2015 study by the U.S. Geological Survey of seismic reflection stated there are faults along the aquifer that “…could provide high permeability passageways for groundwater movement.” In other words, there’s a real possibility of radioactive materials leaking into the Biscayne Aquifer if this practice were to be implemented. If a leak occurs, it will be impossible to clean up. This risk is unacceptable to millions of South Floridians. Unfortunately the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission dismissed a legal challenge to FPL nuclear waste storage plans -- on a filing technicality. The science is clear. The time for State and Federal lawmakers in Florida to step up and protect the citizens they’ve been elected to serve is now. If you agree that we cannot allow this reckless gamble with our water supply today and in the future, please sign and share this petition. Help us tell the Florida Legislature to stop FPL’s plans by banning the storage of nuclear waste near aquifers.
Petition to Statsminister Erna Solberg og Stortinget
STEM FOR ET FORBUD MOT PELSDYROPPDRETT!
Din viktigste signatur for dyrene! Nå er muligheten her: Norge kan snart gå inn i historien som ett av flere land som forbyr organisert mishandling av pelsdyr! Stortinget må i nær fremtid stemme over endelig avvikling av pelsdyrnæringen, og regjeringen skal samtidig vurdere det samme. Det er nå viktigere enn noen gang at politikerne får føle det sterke engasjementet som finnes - at vi er svært mange som bryr oss og som følger med! NOAH, som landets største organisasjon for dyrs rettigheter, starter nå en underskriftkampanje mot pelsdyroppdrett - og signaturene skal leveres til Stortinget og til statsminister Erna Solberg. Signer oppfordringen til Statsministeren og Stortinget om et endelig forbud mot pelsdyroppdrett i Norge! Dette er din viktigste signatur for pelsdyrene! Et representantforslag om forbud mot pelsdyroppdrett og import av pels fra slik produksjon, ble levert til Stortinget fra Miljøpartiet De Grønne i november 2014. Samtidig ba samarbeids- og regjeringspartiene i budsjettforliket, regjeringen om å "vurdere forbud mot norsk pelsdyroppdrett". Høsten 2016 har regjeringen lovet å levere sin "vurdering" til Stortinget - det er første gang en norsk regjering vurderer forbud mot pelsdyroppdrett. Politikerne har gitt mange løfter for pelsdyrene som de ikke har holdt. Vi må vise at vi ikke aksepterer dette. Vi må vise at vi ALDRI gir oss før pelsdyroppdrett er forbudt. I løpet av de 27 årene NOAH har kjempet for pelsdyrene, har et stabilt flertall i befolkningen, et samlet mote-Norge, faglige instanser som blant annet Veterinærforeningen, og flere politiske partier stilt seg på pelsdyrenes side. NOAHs Fakkeltog mot pels samlet 8000 oppmøtte i 24 byer landet rundt i 2015, og er den største markeringen for pelsdyr i hele Europa. I 2016 holdes markeringen 12. november, og snart 30 byer har meldt seg på. 800 000 minker og rever lever i trange nettingbur hvert år, uten å få utløp for sin naturlige adferd, og kun for å dø for å bli til et unødvendig pelsprodukt. La politikerne få klar beskjed med din signatur: Ikke flere tomme ord - vi krever tomme bur! Mer informasjon om hvordan pelsdyrene lever: www.pelsut.no Støtt NOAHs arbeid for pelsdyrene ved å bli medlem: www.dyrsrettigheter.no/medlem
Petition to Council of the European Union, European Commission, John Kerry, Chrystia Freeman, Boris Johnson MP, Jeremy Corbyn MP
Take Action to Free Hunger-Striking Palestinian Journalist Mohammed al-Qeeq
Palestinian journalist Mohammed al-Qeeq is currently jailed by the Israeli occupation without charge or trial under administrative detention. He has launched a hunger strike to demand his freedom and an end to administrative detention. On 22 February, after 17 days on hunger strike, he was suddenly transferred to the Ramle prison hospital after a decline in his health. Al-Qeeq is one of nearly 550 Palestinians imprisoned without charge or trial under administrative detention. Administrative detention orders are issued for one to six month periods, but are indefinitely renewable, which means that Palestinians can be held for years on end without charge or trial at the order of the Israeli occupation military. These orders are issued on the basis of "secret evidence" to which both the detainee and their lawyer is denied access. Administrative detention as practiced by the Israeli state is a systematic mechanism of colonial repression and violates international law. This is Mohammed al-Qeeq's second time on hunger strike. In 2016, he conducted a 94-day hunger strike to win his freedom from administrative detention without charge or trial, winning his release in May 2016. Administrative detention violates international law and Palestinian human rights. When international agencies and officials are silent, it provides yet more space for Israeli administrative detention to continue. We urge you to contact the Israeli government and officially express your concern for the health of Mohammed al-Qeeq and call for his immediate release and the end of the policy of administrative detention.
Petition to U.S. House of Representatives, U.S. Senate, President of the United States, Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi, Julia Brownley, Louise Slaughter, Paul Ryan, Clear Channel Communications
English Closed Captioning in all movies and movie theatres.
Closed Captioning is desired by many people, both deaf and hard of hearing individuals. There are 38,225,590 people within the United States Population who have some sort of hearing disability. (Reference and more information). This makes up a larger proportion of the United States than one might assume. Young and old people alike suffer from being unable to understand movies in theaters, instructional videos, and other audio media that requires the use of the auditory sense. #CaptionIt This petition is appealing mainly to movie theaters to allow captioning to be on the screen if a hard of hearing person, or a deaf person requests this service. Many hearing individuals do not understand accents or whispering within movies; therefore, people are discouraged from attending public movie outings. It should be mandatory for movie theaters to provide captioning on screen for people who are hard of hearing. If this is accomplished, the community who supports this petition may move forward in attempting to obtain captioning in other places such as museums, and other places that might assist hard of hearing and deaf individuals. Please share this petition! #CaptionIt
Petition to Lynda Hopkins, Jerry Threet, San Francisco ICE Field Office, Shirlee Zane, Susan Gorin, David Rabbitt, James Gore, Rosa Mengesha
Sonoma County---Enact an ICE oversight board to protect our students!
We are educators and school staff from across Sonoma county. We are writing to request that Sonoma County officially create an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) subcommittee of the existing county IOLERO (Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach). This ICE subcommittee would have the mission of engaging with and monitoring the local San Francisco ICE field offices in order to help protect our students, our community, our values, and our community social capital. The SF ICE field office, as a branch of a federal agency, may not have any legal requirement to follow advice or requests of our local law enforcement review board, but it would be in SF ICE's self-interest to at least meet with, listen to, and provide information to such a county-sanctioned review board. We believe there should be some border enforcement and that some violent criminals should be deported. However, it is clear to us that recent Executive Orders expanding categories of immigrants to be prioritized for deportation is not in line with the values of our community, our county, and the state of California. Like nearly all California educators, we have students whose families may have very similar stories and circumstances to those of Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos (in Arizona). We have students who may be DACA dreamers or who may have older siblings who are DACA dreamers. (In Seattle, a non-criminal DACA dreamer with a 3-year old American child was just arrested by ICE agents who plan to deport him.) We now have a reasonable fear that one or more families of our students will be torn apart by the agents of the SF ICE field office. This unnecessary act would create fear and trauma for our students and our school community. It would be the forceful imposition of foreign values on our community, county, and state. However, the current federal administration and ICE have made it clear that such actions are in line with both their authority and with their intentions. Our hope is that if we, in Sonoma, speak up on this issue, we can prevent cases like that of Guadalupe Rayos from occurring in our school communities. It will be a tragedy if it happens, even if it happens only once. But, to be clear---the evidence suggests that there are already plans, authority, personnel, and resources collecting in SF ICE field office to inflict just such a tragedy upon us. The default is that such a tragedy or tragedies will likely occur. We should to take strong, immediate action to prevent such tragedies by setting up a county ICE review board. We believe in respectful dialogue and engagement with SF ICE. SF ICE agents have tremendous power to both help protect and to inflict great harm on our community. We believe that their intentions are to protect our community. We do not believe they have a complete understanding of our community, the impact their actions may have on our community, nor a clear understanding of the kind of support we want or need from them. Our expectation is that SF ICE would welcome formal channels of communication and engagement with any community in which they operate.
Petition to Jeanne Jarrett
Coaches Cut 8th-grade Child from Baseball because Parents are Gay
Our names are Kessiah and Stephanie Young. Thank you for taking the time to read and better understand the injustice suffered by our son who is an 8th grader at Newton-Conover Middle School. No matter what your stance on gay marriage or parenting, I think we can all agree that no child deserves to be humiliated and treated unfairly because of their family structure. Discrimination is wrong any time it happens, but when it happens to a child, it's even worse. The only way for our son to receive justice is for him to be given his deserved place back on his baseball team in his final year of middle-school. No other returning player was cut from the team; just our son! We have gone back and forth as to whether we even want our child on this team, around these coaches, but the bottom line is, equality mandates it. Equality is not we let these grown men rob our child of his opportunity to be on his own school team. Equality is making sure we don't let them bully our son off the team. We are asking you to email the school board: email@example.com@firstname.lastname@example.org@email@example.com@n-ccs.org Tell them "Discrimination against a child is wrong. Put Peyton back on the middle school baseball team immediately." Peyton should not have to suffer because his parents are gay. Not only is it wrong, it's illegal. and CALL Newton-Conover City Schools administrative office at (828) 464-3191My number is 828-781-9817 Kessiah Young Today February 27, 2017 we went in to discuss the investigation determination done by the superintendent's office. Dr. David Stegall, whom we had never met until this meeting, refused to hear our comments about our son and the discrimination of him. He was obviously SOOOO upset about everyone's response to this petition that he could not see straight. He blamed this petition for interfering with the investigation, but we have an email from the assistant superintendent indicating that the investigation was over Friday February 24, 2017. This is just another lie and excuse NCCS has used to justify their failure to properly conduct the investigation. Let us not forget, NO ONE at NCCS ever did an assessment/evaluation to prove our son lacked the skills necessary to be on his last year of middle school baseball team, despite he was on the team last year, and the only returning player who was cut. Stegall said, "NCCS has determined that discrimination did not occur because NOT one person came forward to say anything about you being gay." NCCS does not know how to conduct a discrimination case. We have been asked during this whole investigation if anyone called us derogatory names. Seriously!! What NCCS is saying is that discrimination does not exist unless we heard someone or someone comes forward to say they heard coaches call us a names. This is totally ridiculous, and obviously NCCS does not even know the definition of discrimination. Even calling someone these names does not constitute discrimination. It might indicate that a person is a racist, a homophobe, or a sexist, but it does not constitute discrimination. Wow! Discrimination is much more complex. Anyway, David Stegall was pointing his finger, and talking down to us like we were trash, like we were beneath him, like we weren't parents of a child with a discrimination claim! All I could see was his blatant white heterosexual male privilege as he pointed and talked down to us. I have never seen anyone in a such a capacity conduct themselves like he did. He kept saying "I'm going to talk," but when he talked, his intent was to cast blame on us. I finally said, "Look, you are not my daddy." He responded with, "Well, this is my office!" We explained that we are just trying to make it clear that the investigation was blown from the beginning because of the lies told by the head coach, his admission that others would lie for him, and that breaches of confidentiality resulted in retaliation of us and our children. Stegall said, "The principal did a great job. This is the final resolution of NCCS and it all stops here." I said, "No, the next step is the school board." He then said, "You can petition the school board but they don't have to grant you a hearing." Stephanie and I just looked at each other in disbelief. Stegall just admitted coercion and conspiracy between the superintendent and the school board to block justice for Peyton! Evidently they are not even trying to hear our appeal. At least that is the way Stegall tells it. To be clear, Stegall told us today that our avenues for justice are over at NCCS even though the school board should have been the next level of appeal. I guess as a non-voting member of the school board, he should know right? At that point David Stegall said, "I'm calling the meeting." Stephanie said, "Kessiah Let's go." I let him know this was not over and if we have to go to the NC Board of education or the state legislature we will. He basically kicked us out of his office. I looked at Stephanie and said, "He just kicked us out of his office, an office our tax dollars pay for. Wow!" His treatment of us was demeaning, and I cannot believe this is the man some people were saying was such a good person. He might be showing some of y'all one face, but the one he showed us was pure REDNECK in a suit! NCCS is a good ole' boy club that discriminates against children; their students!! The following is a list of the school board members. Feel free to email or call them too. This is the next level of the process. SCHOOL BOARD NEWTON DISTRICT Tim Hayes, Vice-Chair311 West C StreetNewton, NC 28658Home - 828-850-9504Cell - 828-850-9504Employer: Newton Police DepartmentEmail: firstname.lastname@example.orgTerm Began: 12/1/2013Term Expires: 11/30/2017 Jim Stockner81 County Center StreetNewton, NC 28658Home - 828-464-0875Cell - 828-302-0174Employer: RetiredEmail: email@example.comTerm Began: 12/2015Term Expires: 12/2019 Phil Heath200 West 8th StreetNewton, NC 28658Cell - 828-291-8506Employer: Vanguard FurnitureEmail: firstname.lastname@example.orgTerm Began:12/16Term Expires:12/17 CONOVER DISTRICTJeanne Jarrett, ChairPO Box 372Conover, NC 28613Cell - 828-446-6309Work - 828-465-8219Employer: Catawba County Finance OfficeEmail: email@example.comTerm Began: 12/2015Term Expires: 12/2019 Mark Pennell817 Rock Barn Rd NEConover, NC 28613 Home - 828-466-2046Employer: Email: firstname.lastname@example.orgTerm Began: 12/2015Term Expires: 12/2019 Beverly Hall203 Third Ave NEConover, NC 28613Cell - 828-310-6426Employer: RetiredEmail: email@example.comTerm Began: 12/01/2013Term Expire: 11/30/2017 My phone number is 828-781-9817 if anyone has any questions or if you would like to report discrimination against you or your child occurring at NCCS. We have already received a few reports since posting our own son's discrimination involving other NCCS staff. Please know you are not alone. It is all our responsibility as adults to stand up for children and their families. On February 8, 2017 our son Peyton was cut from the Newton-Conover Middle School (NCMS) baseball team because we, his parents, are gay. Just for the record, Peyton is not gay. He was the only returning player cut from the team. All the other boys, including two boys who were team managers from the 2016 season were allowed to play this year. Since bringing this complaint of discrimination to the attention of NCCS, we and our children have been made the targets of retaliation because of the failures in the investigation and breaches of confidentiality. Even some of the parents have targeted us, including the former assistant coach and some of the dad's he is friends with. One dad actually told me "I think it is ridiculous that you are even here." I told him "I call it advocating for my son." I looked at his facebook and saw this anti-LGBT and pro-Trump rhetoric. It is like they cannot stand that two women who are married are standing up for our son. The discrimination against Peyton actually began in 2016. Despite the fact he had been an all-star player years prior and has sound baseball skills, Peyton was treated like he didn't exist on this team by the head coach and one of the volunteer assistant coaches who had a son on the team. Peyton was consistently benched and made to be invisible by the coaches in 2016. Even when Peyton would do something good during practice the coaches never praised or encouraged him. Peyton would come home and say, "I don't know why the coach doesn't like me." We didn't want to jump to conclusions, but we felt like he was being discriminated against because of us, his parents, being gay. This year in 2017 after Peyton was cut we found out that the coach or coaches as the case may be, were telling others in the community that Peyton was cut because "We don't want to deal with Peyton's parents." This is why we continue to go to the practices because now the coach is going to deal with us. On the last day of try-outs Peyton was given the excuse by his head coach, "Peyton, we think we have some 7th graders who are just as good as you, so we are going to let you go and keep them. You should play somewhere else." Again, he was the only boy who played on the 2016 team who was cut. This was his last year of middle school baseball to prepare him for high school. Therefore they not only hurt him this year, but they have impacted his opportunities for next year by discriminating against him. Last year the coach kept 20 kids for one baseball team including two managers. This year he kept 18. Our son was humiliated by this coach. Our son was definitely within the top 7 on the team. The worst thing about the whole experience for him was when he had to walk back to the gym to get his stuff. His team mates, some of whom he has played baseball with since he was 7-8 years old were asking all the boys if they made the team. Peyton told the boys, "No I didn't make the team." The boys did not believe Peyton and thought he was joking. They asked him at least four more times. Finally when it became clear that Peyton was not kidding, the boys were in disbelief that Peyton had been cut. One boy who has played all-star baseball with Peyton when they were younger actually told us to our faces that Peyton should have definitely made the team. At school other boys have come forward to tell Peyton and Peyton's younger brother that it was messed up that he didn't make the team. Peyton was devastated by the coach's actions toward him and while almost in tears he told us that he believes the coach didn't pick him because of the way he looks. He thinks he is "nerdy" and his glasses made him a target for discrimination. We have assured him many times that this has nothing to do with him as a person or athlete but his self-esteem has been destroyed by some grown men who targeted our son because he is not from a "traditional" family structure! This year's team huddles up at the end of each practice, puts hands in and yells, "FAMILY!" I guess our son was not worthy to be part of this family because of his family. This year the coach kept 18 players in all. He even kept 6th and 7th graders whose baseball skills are not up to the level of Peyton's. A new rule was put in place banning participation of any coach who was not a paid staff of the county from being a coach. These coaches violated this North Carolina state school board rule and allowed the violent assistant coach to participate in day 1 of try-outs. Our son said he was 5-6 feet away from players during try-outs and that kids still thought he was a coach (well because obviously he was). The school denies that he is still a coach, but we have been going to practices and have seen him on the field coaching kids on an individual basis. No other parents are given this access, nor should they. This to me is another indication that the try-out process was affected by his presence and participation. Perhaps new try-outs need to be done. Who knows who else may have been the targets of discrimination? We filed a complaint immediately with NCCS on February 8th. On February 9th during a meeting with the principal and athletic director, the head coach began his testimony with a blatant lie. He had been violent against me last season, but during the meeting the head coach lied and said that he never got in my face during the 2016 season. His exact words were, "That never happened." I expected him to lie about why Peyton was cut, but I never expected him to lie about his violent behavior toward me especially since there were witnesses present. He displayed some very convincing theatrics during his testimony and wooed the principal who replied with "oohs and aahs" as she heard his lies. Further disturbing was the head coach's statement that he had witnesses that would say his attack of me never happened. This told Stephanie and I that this coach had the capacity to not only lie and be violent, but that he had enough influence with other coaches that they too would conceal his violent behavior and lie for him. This indicated a systemic issue at NCCS. It was discouraging to know beyond any doubt that the head coach was a liar, because he was lying about something he should have just been able to admit and apologize for. From this point on, his credibility was shot, and I did not believe anything else that came out of his mouth. Last season in 2016, after seeing our child being denied an equal opportunity on the team, we finally decided to ask the head coach what was going on. This was the first and only time any conversation with the us and the coach had ever occurred. The head coach aggressively lunged toward me and stopped six inches from my face and was screaming at the top of his lungs "We want to win games!" He was red in the face and his spit was on mine. He yelled so loudly that he could be heard across the field. He was essentially now bullying the gay parents. He did not treat other moms or dads with this violence and disrespect (not even on the same day as he spoke with them); just us gay parents. Our other child, who was eleven years old at the time, ran to the car when the coach began attacking me to tell his other mom. The coach never apologized for his behavior or actions toward me. The saddest thing about this is that children saw him do this; children who he is supposed to be teaching character to, and how to become good men. The assistant coach (not the assistant coach with the violence issue) didn't flinch at all during this violent episode of his colleague, and backed the head coach in his violence. Other parents were already talking about calling the school board about the coach, and though we considered it, we did not. We feared further retaliation against our son and did not report what the coach had done. Peyton barely played any games at all the entire season. The team lost every game but two the entire season. For us, at this level of baseball, we wanted Peyton to be part of a team because he is an introvert, and baseball has always been his main outlet for peer socialization since he began playing at the age of three. We did not want to jeopardize his chances of playing this year or any other. His younger brother is an extrovert and a socialite, but Peyton really needed an opportunity to develop his relationship skills as a part of the team. In hindsight, we should have handled it differently. Perhaps if we had informed the school of the coach's unethical behavior, maybe he would have stopped targeting our son. This investigation was botched from the beginning as the athletic director informed the head coach of the details of our complaint before he was ever brought in to give his statement, giving the coach opportunity to make up lies for a defense, which he did. Further, this year's assistant coach who had vital information necessary to get to the truth of this investigation, was approached by the athletic director in private instead of giving an official statement in the initial meeting with us. The athletic director instead brought hearsay to the meeting saying, "I talked with the assistant coach and he corroborated the head coach's account." Logically, the next step to revealing the truth was to have an assessment done of Peyton's baseball skills. When we asked that Peyton be evaluated by someone who was not discriminating against him to show that he was not cut due to his baseball skills or ability, the athletic director of NCCS said he was not qualified to do an assessment. The principal at NCMS said they didn't want to get involved. We even asked the athletic director to come to a practice to see the caliber of players who made the team and the athletic director refused. We did however learn during the meeting about the conflict of interests between the athletic director and the head coach. We inquired about the equality of allowing children to attend one day of try-outs when the try-outs last three days. The head coach shifted blame to the athletic director who admitted that he sent a 6th grader to try-outs on the last day and recommended him to the head coach. A child that attended one day of try-outs made the team. My question is how do coaches do fair measurements when Peyton came to all three days as did other children, while some children were allowed to come to just two or even one day and make the team? Further, these same kids have already missed practices within 2 weeks of the season. To this day NCCS has failed to evaluate/assess Peyton's skills which is the only way we could definitively prove that our son was discriminated against. We did not fabricate the defense that our son was not good enough to be on the team. The head coach did that. NCCS WILL NOT assess our son and give him equal access and opportunity to be on the baseball team because their entire defense will be shown to be a lie. We have now been to the principal, and now the superintendent's office (of which we are awaiting an answer), and the next step is the school board. Please help us get justice for our son. He deserves to be part of his baseball team in his last year of middle school. Stephanie added this for clarification: To put things in further context as far as what we have done for our son thus far, prior to the petition and public outreach... We've given the school every opportunity to evaluate Peyton and get him back on the team and two weeks later we've gotten no resolution whatsoever! We've suggested tryouts be redone so that all the kids can be looked at by objective coaches and/or staff. We've asked the athletic director to assess Peyton and the other players during practice and he told us he wasn't qualified. We have even said that all the kids cut should be put on the team just to ensure no other discrimination occurred but we have been ignored. I requested copies of the measurements used during tryouts of all players, with names omitted of course for privacy reasons, so that we could compare Peyton's measurements to others but no one would give those over either. We brought up the new rule that only allows paid county staff to coach, and the way the assistant coach from last year who is not paid staff was involved in tryouts and continues to be in a coaching role for the middle school and how this intimidated our son and should be a legitimate reason for Peyton's reinstatement or new tryouts for all players. Peyton, who is such an introvert, spoke to the superintendent and looked into his eyes and told him how he has been treated and the effects it's had on him. Jayce gave his account of the coach attacking Kessiah last season which he denies completely and still no attempt from the superintendent to get justice for Peyton! They blew the investigation from the beginning and have allowed the coaches to turn parents and players against us and Peyton. Kessiah was attacked by the assistant coach from last year and another dad who we don't even know, for being at practice all the while insulting our son and his ability. Confidentiality has been breached and Peyton is at risk of bullying and further damage! The evidence is overwhelming and to refuse to do the necessary assessments only proves that there is something to hide! I've never seen such a mess of an investigation! HISTORICAL CONTEXT: Just to give a little context, the volunteer assistant coach at NCMS for the 2016 season had been a former coach of our kids at an optimist years before. He was violent with other coaches, parents and kids, and on one of these occasions during a game threatened another coach saying, "I'll whoop your ass!" He was also very homophobic and religious. He had an assumption that we weren't christians because we were gay (He didn't realize I am a minister and actually have a Masters of Divinity from Wake Forest School of Divinity. Both my wife and I, and our two boys are Jesus followers who believe all people regardless of religion or lack thereof should be treated equally). We pulled our kids out of that optimist and moved them to another optimist under new leadership. This crazy coach called and begged us to let our kids play on his team, saying, "I'm a changed man. I don't act like I used to." We told him we did not want our kids around him. You can imagine our surprise when Peyton came home from his middle school tryouts and said, "You'll never guess who the assistant coach is." We were in shock and disgust that he was now coaching our child again. Peyton said that this man acted like he didn't even know him. To be clear, a man who knew how talented our kid was, and begged us to let him play on his team when we left the optimist, now acted like he didn't know him at all. Unfortunately, the Newton-Conover City Schools (NCCS) system did not properly vet this guy before allowing him to become a volunteer assistant coach. I mean, seriously, countless people in the community know about his violent behavior. It is our belief that this guy who was the volunteer assistant coach in 2016 filled the head coach's mind full of lies about us and Peyton which led him to form negative opinions about our family and discriminate against Peyton. In fact during the 2016 season, this volunteer assistant coach approached my car while I was waiting for Peyton to come out of the gym after an away game and said, "You can talk about me all you want, but you ain't gonna talk about my son." I told him no one was talking about his son. I did tell him I was not happy about how Peyton was being treated. The volunteer assistant coach then said, "If it were up to me, Peyton would be playing, but it ain't up to me." I guess this was his way of saying that the head coach was responsible for the discrimination, but who knows what he said when they were alone??? I just don't know. I mean, this is a man who claimed he had changed, but he was using profanity during an NCMS home game in 2016 to talk about a play his son made calling it or him "damn dumb." His wife tried to redirect him but he responded, "It was damn dumb!" This is the caliber of coaches NCMS allowed to coach our children; our students. To be clear, the head coach, per the policies of NCCS, is responsible for the behavior of himself and all his assistant coaches. Why would a head coach choose a volunteer assistant coach with a reputation and ongoing behavior of being violent and homophobic? It is my belief that they have these things in common. Otherwise, why align yourself with this type of person? I want to be clear that this petition is not about baseball. Some people who obviously do not know our child but are supporting the perpetrators of our child have falsely assumed that our child is a sub-par baseball player undeserving of being on the team, and that we are upset because he was not good enough resulting in him being cut from the team. We are not "those" parents. Our child is a great baseball player. We don't need any coach to confirm that fact. We know that him being cut from the team had nothing to do with him, his skill, ability, or his character, but instead had everything to do with discrimination done by his coaches. As I've said before, these coaches know that too which is why NCCS would never assess/evaluate him. These coaches did not want to deal with gay parents. This discrimination is illegal and is a federal crime. We would never invest the time and resources required because of just baseball!! That is ridiculous. However, investing this time to address obvious discrimination of our child and to prevent discrimination of other children in the future is well worth the investment. If NCCS system does not bring justice and reconciliation to this situation, which minimally is putting Peyton back on the team, we will seek justice and relief to the furthest extent available to us. I would advise NCCS staff, teachers, and coaches who were not part of this discrimination to unhitch your future from grown men who bully and discriminate against children. Don't lower yourself by continuing to lie, cover up the truth, and risk ruining your own future. This might result in your ineligibility to teach or coach children in public schools because institutions do not want to employ people who discriminate. People who discriminate against children are liabilities. There is absolutely no valid reason why our child was the only player on last year's team to be cut except for the reason of discrimination. Please help our son get the justice he deserves. No child should be disenfranchised because of their parents. I leave you with the words of our younger son's football coach. This man and his wife have been great role models for our son and other kids. His name is Jonathan Matthew Elliott, and he has coached championship teams, invests in children, is a great dad, and understands what it means to be a real coach. I highly recommend him for all parents and all kids. He is at St. Stephens Optimist: Jonathan ElliottHickory, NC1 day agoAs a coach, our duty is first and foremost to the kids. Not just the team as a whole, but every individual child is our responsibility to develop and mentor. Parents trust coaches with their children with the understanding that the coach will educate their child with the fundamentals of the game but also with principles that reach far beyond any ball field. They expect us to put the safety of the people they love the most above all else. This includes both the physical and mental health of the child. It is obvious to me given the details of this situation that all these sacred bonds between parent and coach have been broken. One of the hardest situations for me to grasp as a coach is that Peyton played on this team last year and then somehow came up short this year. To me, there is only two explanations for this. The first is that this coach is so bad, that even though he had an entire year to develop a player whom he thought talented enough to make the roster originally, that player regressed to a point that he felt the player could no longer make the cut. If that is the case, then the blame clearly lies on the coach. It is hard for me to convey how much I value returning players to my team. From a coaches perspective, these players should be an invaluable asset because they have already spent a year developing under you. This should give them an advantage over all the other kids. If that isn't the case, it is time for the coach to do some serious self reflection. The other explanation is far more heinous. Any coach who cuts a player for discriminatory reasons, should suffer legal action and not be allowed to coach our youth any longer. Children are the future, and when you consider the impact a coach can make on a child's life, it is imperative that these men and women possess the moral compass to help guide our children towards a future that isn't ruled by ignorance and hate.