Petition to FCC, United States Supreme Court, Federal Trade Commission, Ajit Pai
Protect Net Neutrality from the Trump Administration
The internet has helped to boost the economy, create an amazing tool for educators, and provides an outlet for communication with people all over the world. However, the simple policy that keeps the internet a strangely level-playing field (and the internet itself) is under fire from both the Trump administration and service providers like Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon. Sign this petition to call on the FCC to protect net neutrality under the Trump administration. Net neutrality regulations are set to stop ISPs like the big cable and phone companies from favoring/crippling certain websites and services for their own benefit and monetary gain. These rulings could be reversed as Republicans look to deregulate private industries. As a junior in high school, I can appreciate the need to be able to complete homework, communicate, and access streaming media like Netflix without an ISP slowing down my traffic. In the 21st century, internet is like running water, electricity, or transportation. Those without neutral access to it are at a major disadvantage. If net neutrality goes away, the internet will become distorted, and your access to certain content will be based upon your ISP's financial interests and what you're willing to pay, like cable television, hurting the consumer. Let's stop the telecom lobbyists who buy their influence, and the private companies who already control so much of our media before it is too late.
Petition to Dianne Feinstein, Patty Murray, Maria Cantwell, Debbie Stabenow, Amy Klobuchar, Claire McCaskill, Jeanne Shaheen, Kirsten Gillibrand, Mazie Hirono, Elizabeth Warren
Support Al Franken to stay in the Senate
Al Franken has been a leader with a strong voice in the senate for issues that are important to women. He should be allowed to go through the ethics review that he called for regarding these women's accusations against him. As Democratic female leaders in the senate, I expect you to use critical thinking and weigh the facts before coming to a conclusion. The majority of Al Franken's accusers have remained anonymous, and what they are accusing Senator Franken of, is not morally equivalent to Roy Moore or others who have had much more serious accusations. We need Al Franken's leadership in the senate. If after the ethics review, or if there are more serious allegations, only then should you be calling for him to resign.
Petition to Comcast
Comcast: Stop Funding Accused Child Molester Roy Moore
Tell Comcast to stop funding the RNC so long as it supports accused child molester Roy Moore. Comcast has given at least $100,000 this year to the Republican National Committee -- which is now funding Roy Moore's Senate campaign. This means that Comcast's money is being used to help elect an accused child sex abuser. Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore has been accused of child sex assault by multiple credible sources. On Wednesday, December 6, news surfaced that the RNC had just poured an additional $170,000 into Moore's campaign. Join me in calling on Comcast and its subsidiary, NBCUniversal, to stop funding the RNC unless it permanently withdraws its support from Roy Moore's campaign. So long as the leaders of Comcast / NBCUniversal continue to fund the RNC, they are complicit in trying to elect Roy Moore to the United States Senate. If Comcast stops funding the RNC, other companies will follow suit. Join the call for Comcast / NBC Universal to stop funneling money through the RNC to elect a person accused of child sex assault. (Here's a source documenting Comcast's contributions.)
Petition to U.S. House of Representatives, Donald Trump, U.S. Senate
Protect Our Internet Privacy From Being Sold Out
UPDATE: https://www.change.org/p/u-s-house-of-representatives-protect-our-internet-privacy-from-being-sold-out/u/19925177 The Problem - S.J.Res.34 BillOn April 3rd, 2017 President Trump signed a bill to kill the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) privacy framework, which was created to protect the usage of broadband consumers' sensitive data: Requiring internet service providers (ISPs) to ask for permission before collecting sensitive information such as content of communications, precise geo-location, financial information, etc. Allowing users to opt out of giving sensitive information to ISPs Only allow ISPs to collect basic service information Notify customers within 30 days that their data has been stolen in a data breach ISPs (Verizon, Comcast, AT&T, Cox, etc) have lobbied $1,726,288 against these regulations and have passed the bill through Senate 50 to 48 and the House 215 to 205. These votes were made along party lines but whether you are on the Democrat or Republican side, this issue affects the privacy of all Americans sets precedent for future privacy-killing laws being passed. The elimination of of these rules allows ISPs to: Monitor and sell all of your location data, search history, app usage, and browsing habits without your permission Hijack your search results and redirect your traffic to paying third parties Insert ads into web pages that would not have otherwise had them Why Does This Matter The issue directly affects your privacy in the United States, and will indirectly affect it outside of North America. The passing of this bill allows the government and corporations to take away your rights for the sake of profit, and it will begin to pave the way for them to take away more rights in the future. Whether your privacy and the passing of this law is a concern to you or not, everyone has a fundamental right to their privacy just as they have a right to free speech, a decent standard of living, and/or any other basic human right. Allowing corporations into your digital life is no different than allowing strangers into your home and personal belongings, and with the passing of this bill, you are letting them sell who you are to anyone willing to pay. "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say" - Edward SnowdenWhat You Can Do To Protect Yourself Although this bill has already been signed into law, a new law can be passed to reinstate the FCC's "Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Communication Services" rules. Start by signing and sharing this petition and the petition on the official White House website which is linked below. Contact your representatives and ask them to introduce and vote for a new bill to reinstate the rules. White House Website Petition: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/reinstating-protecting-privacy-customers-broadband-and-other-telecommunications-services Contact Your House Representative: http://www.house.gov/htbin/findrep Contact Your Senator: https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Petition to Gary Peters, David Perdue, Debbie Stabenow, Ted Cruz, John Cornyn, Dianne Feinstein, Kamala Harris, Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Karen Handel, Johnny Isakson, Ajit Pai
Save Net Neutrality
Net neutrality preserves the right to communicate freely on the internet. Net neutrality requires internet service providers (ISPs) to give everyone equal access to everything you use on the internet-- email, watching videos, reading news articles, and listening to music. It prohibits ISPs from slowing down, speeding up, or blocking content on the internet. It is how the internet has always worked. Unfortunately, this is being threatened by the FCC- the Federal Communications Commission. If the FCC ends net neutrality, then how we’ve used the internet changes completely. ISPs will be able to block content, slow down internet access, and favor websites over others. It will also end the Title II of the Communications Act, which charges ISPs for blocking content or slowing down internet and creating “fast lanes.” “Fast lanes” would allow certain internet service providers to give internet access faster than any other service providers. Ending net neutrality could have global impacts and change the way the world shares information and changes how information is processed. As high school seniors about to enter into the real world, we cannot imagine what life would be like if we did not have net neutrality. Net neutrality allows us to use our freedom of speech on a platform that is like no other. I can go on the internet and research something without the fear that an ISP has favored a certain website that is completely biased one way or blocked certain websites. If you believe we should have free access to the internet, sign this petition to show your support. This issue is time sensitive and must be addressed. Support free and open internet! Thank you for your support, Katie Lemon and Virginia Rowlett
Petition to Ajit Pai, Donald Trump, Cheryl King
Internet Privacy and Net Neutrality
While many of you may think that you are secure on the internet, none of you are. How many of you have a Gmail? How about a Google plus or a twitter account? YouTube? These programs are tracking you. Public law 115-22, passed on April 3, takes privacy protection to a whole new level. On December 16, 2016, the Obama administration and The FCC (Federal Communications Commission), passed a law relating to “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services”, or FCC 16-148. While you can feel free to Google that, it’s a 72-page document, so I’ll just give you the gist of it. This new law protected Net Neutrality and customer privacy. Internet Service providers such as Verizon now had to protect their subscribers from cyberattacks, report any cyberattacks, protect their subscriber’s privacy, and could not sell user data. Consider this: you pay for Internet. You don’t pay for Google or Twitter. Google and twitter’s services are free. Google only makes $32 dollars off you. If you had been willing to pay just $32, you could get Google without trackers! But in the early 2000’s, the consumers decided that they didn’t want to pay for internet services. So, websites like Tripod (The precursor of Myspace, which was the precursor of Facebook, etc.), started placing ads on their pages. This worked great for a while, up until some executive decided that they could make more money if they targeted specific users. (Ad Networks pay-per-click, which means the more clicks on an ad, the more the website makes.) And so tracking was born! But back to Public law 115-22. No only does this law remove online privacy protections, but it also means that ISPs no longer have to report cyberattacks, so your passwords, Social Security Number, and more could be compromised, and Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, Bell, or whatever ISP you use, wouldn’t even have to tell you! And guess what? That data that ISPs now have access to means that they are making even more money by selling your data that you pay them to acquire. Not to mention, Net Neutrality is down the toilet as well, which means that the internet could be more like a TV service, where you pay for individual sites, or websites like Netflix would have to pay to deliver their content to customers on that ISP. So what can you do? You can sign my petition, or talk to your local congressman. And to protect your data, you can sign up for a VPN like Tunnel Bear, or use TOR, i2p, or freenet. You can also look for a green lock on the upper left hand corner of your browser to ensure that the site that you are browsing is secure. But most importantly, you need to stay aware of what you are sharing online, and who you are sharing it with. And remember, your data isn’t yours anymore when it’s on the Internet.
Petition to Barack Obama, President Donald Trump
GRANT FELIX WALLS an EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY
Oct 30, 2015 — Petition For Commutation of Sentence/Clemency TO : The President of the United States The undersigned petitioner, Felix Walls, Reg. No. 02414112, date of birth January 19, 1942, a United States citizen, who has no prior filing of said petition, being a federal prisoner; convicted for a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841 and 846 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan sentenced to life imprisonment on February 3, 2003, on a plea of not guilty. Having sought review by the Supreme Court prays for commutation of sentence and/or clemency and in support of my petition I ask that you please take into consideration the fact that this petition also falls under the “Compassionate Release’ as I am a senior citizen with deteriorating health, I can barely move around and barely see at times. I have done over 20 years of imprisonment and such time has been served for a non violent offense. Further, I have a biological daughter who is in desperate need of a kidney donor. I, as her biological father may very well a potential donor for her. I ask that it is taken into consideration that I may very well be her only chance for being a match for her. Further, in support there of the petition I state as follows; All Subsequent Indictments are in clear violation of the Speedy Trial Act. The delay between the arrest and each superseding trial is in clear violation of the Speedy Trial Act. Had the supeserseding indictments been timely made (though they were not ) they are defective as a superseding indictment may narrow, but not broaden, the charges made in the original indictment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3288-3289; United States v. Miller, 471 U.S. 130 (1985) The complaint that resulted in the petitioner’s arrest contains a charge not contained in the original indictment but added in a superseding indictment, which is not filed within thirty days of the original complaint; the charge is subject to dismissal. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 3161(b),3162(a)(1) The original criminal indictment is a fatal, defect, the original indictment does not pass constitutional muster, an indictment “must allege lucidly and accurately all the essential elements of the [crime] . . . charged.” The original indictment failed to meet this requirement, it suffers from a fatal defect and cannot support a conviction. Fatal defects in indictments are jurisdictional, and may be raised at any time. Further the indictment failed to allege drug amounts or penalty statutes, in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey ,530 U.S. 466 (2000). See also FRCP Rule 7©(1). See Also U.S. v Landham, 251 F.3d 1072, 1082 (2001) Any factor other than conviction that increases the Defendant sentence must be determined by a jury. See Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)* this includes the constitutionality of any prior convictions See Tucker, 404 U.S. 443 The petitioner’s “valued right to have his trial completed by a particular tribunal” is within the protection of the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy, since it is that “right” that lies at the foundation of the federal rule that jeopardy attaches when the jury is empanelled and sworn. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. Also, The Double Jeopardy Clause protects a criminal defendant from multiple successive prosecutions for the same offense that arise from prosecutorial overreaching engaged in with the deliberate intent of depriving him of having his trial completed by a particular tribunal or prejudicing the possibility of an acquittal that the prosecutor believed likely . Double Jeopardy as well as collateral estoppel precluded further institution of charges as well as successive punishment. An accused may not be sentenced on the basis of materially false assumptions or misinformation, but must be based upon reliable and accurate information. See Townsend v Burke, 334 U.S. 736, see also Morrisry v Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). CERTIFICATION AND PERSONAL OATH I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, information and belief that the information as provided above and contained herein is true and correct. I understand that any intentional misstatements of material facts contained in the petition may cause an adverse action and may subject me to penalties, criminal and/or civil.
Petition to Rob Portman
Tell Senator Rob Portman: Denounce Roy Moore
"Numerous women have come forward alleging that he approached, dated, or in some cases sexually assaulted them when they were teenagers and he was in his 30s, has played out like a concentrated version of Mr. Moore’s combative history, in which he rose to national prominence as an unyielding spokesman for conservative and religious values" (NYT). Ohio Senator Rob Portman said he believes Roy Moore's accusers but has failed to denounce the man and his candidacy for US Senate. Now that the GOP is fully funding Roy Moore's campaign, we demand that Senator Portman unequivocally denounce Roy Moore and his horrific crimes. #NoMoore