482 firmas
Planning
- 25.489 personas que apoyan esta causa están tomando medidas sobre este tema.
- 2 peticiones comenzaron en esta comunidad.
Inicia una petición
Explora 2 peticiones en Planning
Temas relacionados con Planning
Historias y actualizaciones de los creadores de peticiones
Victorias en Planning
5 firmantes están hablando sobre peticiones relacionadas con Planning
I feel it is immoral that big business gets an inroad to approvals and whilst area is of significance and no doubt potential for tourist $$$$. Do we want to be another Gold Coast ?!?! We are all guardians of this planet and should not expose such a sensitive area to the impacts upon the very environment they want to promote. Governments should not be winding back legislation set in perpetuity for short term gains. The Northern Inter Urban Break should be jealously guarded for perpetuity, ie hands off development - when it’s gone it’s gone. Protect the natural environment please.
Dianne ha apoyado: Protect Pumicestone Passage and the Greenbelt – Assessment under environment laws criticalI wish to address the subject of the greenbelt between Brisband and the Sunshine Coast, particularly the applications for large-scale intensive and impactful developments at 1807 and 1641 Roys Road, Coochin Creek, Sunshine Coast, Queensland.
These sites are located next to the ecologically significant Pumicestone Passage, a Ramsar-listed wetland of international importance.
Neither development has been referred for review by the Federal Government (as required by law) and neither development is transparent to the community.
We, the people, are concerned that the Sunshine Coast Council and SARA’s serious and valid concerns regarding the significant change to the proposed areas, (being that of environmental impacts etc) are being overlooked and the Community concerns sidelined. I wholeheartedly agree with the petition which calls on the Minister to please~
not proceed with the proposed Ministerial Call-Ins
respect the authority of Sunshine Coast Council and SARA
protect Pumicestone Passage, its wildlife, and community’s voice.
alison ha apoyado: Protect Pumicestone Passage and the Greenbelt – Assessment under environment laws criticalLife is stressful and the added stress of getting a parking daily in either Redland Bay or on the SMB Island is highly stressful, impacting detrimentally to health of Impacted SMBI Residents in addition to life’s daily stresses. We should have the same rights for a designated parking for each household that live on the SMBI the same as the people have on the “Mainland” our Redland Bay rates & taxes and Government taxes are the same as any other Australian however the access to park with safety should be guaranteed the same way as access for teachers and students are guaranteed to travel on public transport and park at home with full vehicular access between home and mainland. Why must these residents be subject to being the exception. “New Legislation” Refland Bay residents may not park their vehicle at home but 600m away and their are only 1/10th parking spaces available let’s see our elected council members and associated department heads be subject to these same experiences for the rest of their careers. Then observe the changes to legislative rules and available access becomes the norm. Not the exception then observe the availability of parking and access changes.
Gerry ha apoyado: Redland Bay Islanders NEED parking and council plans to make it WORSE!Bay Islands residents are struggling to find parking any time of the day. I'll be leaving the islands this November and I'm signing this petition in hopes that the Island residents get the parking that is required through to at least 2030 as more are relocating to the Jupiter island giants Russell and Macleay Island as well as Karragarra and Lamb Island. More residents = More parking needed. The island residents shouldn't have to suffer this problem for over seven years with no action taken.
Sam ha apoyado: Redland Bay Islanders NEED parking and council plans to make it WORSE!31 years of Redland Council deliberately ignoring the needs of the islands regarding parking. When collecting $2.7 million one year in car parking fines Redland Council has made it plainly obvious that they would prefer to collect Revenue rather than giving adequate parking to the growing islands population.
Redlands are very quick to promote and help the islands grow without any plan for the increased parking needs.
When will Redlands stop using our Mainland car park for Revenue hunting?
Tanya ha apoyado: Redland Bay Islanders NEED parking and council plans to make it WORSE!No estás solo: hay una comunidad de firmantes lista para apoyarte.
Inicia una petición