Topic

Sexual Assault

244 petitions

Update posted 4 hours ago

Petition to Dr. Geert ten Dam, Dr. Jet Bussemaker, Mr. Ard van der Steur, Mr. Mark Rutte

Justice for Emily: Help rape survivor fight university’s institutional abuse and cover-ups

Highlights:   A rape survivor encounters abuse and discrimination by a professor at the University of Amsterdam The university dismisses all of her complaints based on untruthful and slanderous testimonies Soon afterward, the same professor impersonates the dean and sends a letter to the student forbidding her from conducting her graduation fieldwork project While she is appealing against the decision, the university invalidates all of her earned academic credits, stating she has made no progress in her graduation project Without her academic credits, she will lose her student visa and has to leave the Netherlands. Therefore, the university can circumvent the accusations altogether. Imagine you send your daughter to study abroad. One year later, she comes back with rape trauma without a Master’s degree. After spending three years overcoming her ordeal, she goes back to school to complete her studies. However, her past is held against her, and she is abused and discriminated against relentlessly by her professor. When she plucks up all her courage to speak up, she is confronted with lies, cover-ups and retaliation by university staff. This is what has been happening to Emily (pseudonym). She is a Master’s student at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Five years ago, Emily had to give up her studies and leave the country due to rape trauma. In September 2014, she went back to Amsterdam to complete her degree. She decided not to let rape define her or dictate her future. She started the semester just like other students and did not ask for any special consideration. She did not share her past with her classmates in order to have a normal student life. Emily was happy to be back and continued working hard to successfully complete her studies. However, in October 2014, the director of her program (the only person who knew her from the previous time and who belittled and tormented her five years ago), approached her in class and made impudent and condescending comments about Emily’s private matters and health in front of her classmates. A few days later, Emily’s thesis supervisor informed her that the director had excluded her from a project because of “a concern for her wellbeing,” and she had to choose another one from other available projects. Emily felt utterly violated; she was not expecting a stranger to bring up her private matters, let alone tell her what she was allowed to do or not allowed to do based on her personal painful past that she had never consented to sharing. Her supervisor stated “I fully sympathise [with] you feeling you’re not treated like other students and feeling offended by that. At the same time, however, I also understand that what has happened has not only shaped you, but also UvA staff and that they do give [sic, recte take] previous times into account.” Emily was never informed of any conditionalities when she was re-accepted into the Master’s program. The following week, the director of the program informed Emily that she was now allowed to participate in the project she was initially excluded from since budgetary issues were resolved. Now there was an additional position available. Realizing that her private information was not only inappropriately used, but also was exploited as a pretext for budgetary issues, she emailed her supervisor. She confirmed that the issue was indeed an administrative matter, stating “'using your rape experience against you for the sake of money' is not an accurate description of the decisions initially taken. Monetary issues played their part, but only b/c, in principle, the project had space for only two students. I.e. a decision had to be taken considering three students were interested.” After the series of events: 1. being publicly humiliated, 2. having her trauma exploited, and 3. being completely stripped of dignity and personal autonomy, Emily felt as though she was raped all over again. She filed complaints for harassment, privacy violations and discrimination. She specifically stated that she had never consented to disclosing her confidential information, let alone having it assessed or used for arbitrary and unilateral decisions by faculty members who had no medical qualifications. She requested that the university rectify the issues and ensure her that it would never happen again. In response to Emily’s complaints, the director relentlessly brought up Emily’s untruthful “mental problems” and undermined her credibility. The director claimed that Emily’s professors and classmates had reported that she had been “easily emotionally agitated” and expressed their concerns about her mental well-being at the beginning of the semester. The director used this story to justify her action in class. She claimed that she was not aware of the details of Emily’s private information, and therefore, was not capable of violating her privacy. She also claimed that there had never been a decision to exclude Emily from the project. Emily’s supervisor likewise testified that she had never told Emily that she had been excluded, and denied there had ever been such a decision. The University of Amsterdam officially supported all of the director’s claims and dismissed all of Emily’s complaints. Emily did not know what to believe after being told that her professors and classmates, behind her back, had reported her “mental problems”, which she herself had absolutely not been aware of. Moreover, Emily’s another professor, who had nothing to do with the complaints, showed up at the hearing in support of the director, thereby taking a stance against Emily, despite repeated pleas from Emily that the university handle the complaints confidentially and with sensitivity. Emily was also very puzzled by her supervisor’s testimony, especially since she had always shown sympathy for Emily’s trouble with the director. Furthermore, when Emily expressed her concern about her complaints putting her supervisor in a difficult position at the university, she responded “I would have no problems whatsoever.” Because Emily fully trusted her honesty, she believed this must have been some kind of mistake, and decided to ask her about the testimony. Her supervisor refused to explain and dismissed Emily from her supervision. After that series of events, Emily felt as though everyone was against her, and nobody would believe anything she would say. She felt completely isolated, powerless, worthless and hopeless. When she finally talked with her classmates in June 2015, they were completely shocked and assured her that they had never reported anything about her to the director. They had not noticed anything unusual about Emily, and besides, they would not have bothered to report anything to the director even if a new classmate had come off as different. They were never informed of or consented to their “testimony” which they had never provided. They also agreed that it would have been impossible for professors to pay attention to and observe one particular student among more than 30 students and determine her emotional state during the first few lectures. They signed to confirm that they had never reported anything about Emily, and also wrote supporting letters describing her with words such as: conscientious, hardworking, friendly, passionate, responsible and kind, and called her someone with integrity, diligence, respect, intelligence and empathy, and strongly asserted that the university’s claims had inconsistencies.   In July 2015, Emily received a letter from the dean of graduate school, informing her that she was not allowed to conduct any fieldwork project out of “a concern for her well-being”. Once again, she was denied her right to education based on her private matters that she had never confirmed, never consented to sharing or having assessed or used by faculty members. She lodged an appeal against this decision. In response, the dean apologized for her feelings and misunderstandings, but denied any wrongful acts or discrimination. When she inquired about the letter, he informally admitted that the letter had actually been written by the director while he was on vacation, and therefore, he had not even read or approved the letter. When Emily asked him why he would not formally state so and why the director was not held accountable, he explained that it would affect his secretary because she helped the director send the letter. Emily has been contending that the dean’s explanations and excuses for “his decision” are pointless and nonsense especially since he is merely a scapegoat who has been cluelessly held responsible for the director’s actions. He is not capable of explaining “his decision” because he never made the decision to begin with. Emily is continuing to demand the issues be rectified based on the whole truth, with integrity, accountability and transparency. In September 2016, the university invalidated all of Emily’s earned academic credits stating that she made no academic progress in the past year. Emily could not make academic progress because the director forbade her from progressing. Furthermore, she was in the process of appealing against the decision, which has been taking significant amount of time and is still ongoing because the dean has been talking nonsense and refusing to provide the whole truth. Without her academic credits, she will lose her student visa, and will have to leave the country. In my opinion, this is whistleblower retaliation, which enables the university to remove her from the country and get rid of the accusations altogether. During the whole ordeal, Emily has been obliged to continue paying her tuition fees (14700 euros per year) even though she has been denied the education that she has been paying for. On the other hand, the university staff has been continuing with their lives and work without consequences, as if Emily does not exist. As Emily’s friend, I find the whole situation outrageous beyond what words can describe. Instead of reflecting on and rectifying their actions, this “educational” institution has been doing what it takes to cover up their misconduct and circumvent responsibility. Their actions make a mockery of not only Emily’s courage but also of the whole Dutch education system, whose members work hard to maintain a high standard of institutional diligence and integrity. Moreover, Emily went back to study and focus on topics such as human rights and education. The inhumane attitude and behavior of her professors, whose specializations include education rights, children’s rights and gender equality has been the ultimate betrayal to Emily’s hopes and desires to learn anything from these “experts”. After brutal rape, abuse, discrimination, injustices and retaliation, Emily has been through enough. She overcame horrific trauma she had never wished for. She decided to get her life back by finishing her Master’s degree. She stood up for herself only to ask to be treated like a normal human being. She continues to fight for justice, truth and integrity because that is what she believes in and stands for. She has done nothing to be ashamed of. She deserves justice and the completion of her Master's degree in an environment where her fundamental rights are not violated by university staff. Therefore, with this petition, I formally request the following.   Requests The Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and the Government of the Netherlands: Conduct an independent, thorough inquiry into Emily’s original complaints, the university’s subsequent cover-ups and retaliation, and hold individuals accountable for their misconduct Immigration and Naturalisation Service, Ministry of Security and Justice of the Netherlands: Ensure that Emily will not lose her student visa until her graduation The University of Amsterdam: Retract the invalidation of Emily’s academic credits and exempt her from paying tuition until the ongoing situation is resolved   When I saw Emily just before she left for the Netherlands, she was very vibrant and thrilled to finally complete her Master’s degree. I want to see her return with her same happy face with her diploma. Please imagine Emily is you or your loved one. If you are willing to support Emily, please sign this petition. Thank you.  #enoughbsUvA

Rachel Weston
1,404 supporters
Update posted 4 days ago

Petition to United States Supreme Court

Justice for heinous crimes against the Constitution of the United States of America.

-The goal of this petition is to seek justice, arrest and place on trial until convicted or proven innocent in a Supreme Court of Law after extensive in depth investigations by an approved team of classified intelligence agents as well as sex trafficking agents in regards to Hillary Clinton's files, The Department of Justice and other persons unmentioned. 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy18USC§201 - Bribery 18USC§208 - Acts Effecting A Personal Financial Interest (Includes Recommendations) 18USC§371 - Conspiracy 18USC§1001 - False Statements 18USC§1341 - Frauds And Swindles (Mail Fraud) 18USC§1343 - Fraud By Wire 18USC§1349 - Attempt And Conspiracy (To Commit Fraud) 18USC§1505 - Obstruction Of Justice 18USC§1519 - Destruction (Alteration Or Falsification) Of Records In Federal Investigation 18USC§1621 - Perjury (Including Documents Signed Under Penalties Of Perjury) 18USC§1905 - Disclosure Of Confidential Information 18USC§1924 - Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material 18USC§2071 - Concealment (Removal Or Mutilation) Of Government Records 18USC§7201 - Attempt To Evade Or Defeat A Tax (Use Of Clinton Foundation Funds For Personal Or Political Purposes) 18USC§7212 - Attempts To Interfere With Administration Of Internal Revenue Laws (Call To IRS On Behalf Of UBS Not Turning Over Accounts To IRS)     MAIN FOCUS Source for Investigation - 650,000+ emails from Anthony Weiner's Laptop confiscated by the NYPD Special Victims Unit (SVU) in connection with the largest nationwide raid of a pedophilia ring leading to the arrest of 239 Adults and the rescue of 89 or so Children (Operation Cross Country X, October 13, 2016 - October 16,2016).18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion18 U.S. Code § 2251 - Sexual exploitation of children10 U.S. Code § 920 - Art. 120. Rape and sexual assault generally18 U.S. Code § 1111 - Murder18 U.S. Code § 1113 - Attempt to commit murder or manslaughterRegardless of who is speculated and who is named, EVERYONE needs to be vetted by a jury of their peers in this scenario. Connection between her Spouse (Bill Clinton) and Jeffery Epstein, Huma Abedin, Barack Obama, Anthony Weiner, George Soros, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Tony Podesta, John Podesta, Laura Silsby, Marina Abramovic, James Achilles Alefantis, and anyone linked to Alefantis via instragram to solicit children. David Brock, Biljana Djurdjevic, Tamera Luzzatto, Allisen Larsen, Cassie May Windham-wills, Christopher boutlier, Johanan Merino, Ghislaine Maxwell, Amanda Kleinman, Joe Wills, Izette Maccoby Folger, to name a few. Also including Members of the Bush Administration, Obama Administration and the Clinton Campaign and the Clinton Foundation. Big Chesse LLC, HRC speechwrite, Terasol Bistro. (The Beyond Borders Charity, Comets Ping Pong, Besta Pizza, Bucks Fishing company). Also the supposed links with Celebrities, Politicians and  other Wealthy business Owners that are sure to be linked by a Full Detailed Legal Investigation. Links to the Occult and Satanic Ritual Abuse needs to be investigated to the fullest. (sex slave island and a farm in Lovettsville).

Dylan Muschong
25 supporters
Started 5 days ago

Petition to THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Child Exploitation Investigations Unit (ICE), The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), National Office on Violence Against Women, Christopher Poole

SHUT DOWN ANON-IB AND 4CHAN FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND ENDANGERMENT OF WOMEN

ANON-IB and 4CHAN are two of the many websites that encourage the posting of UNSOLICITED photos of "local girls" along with their names, phone numbers, addresses, facebook accounts, and any other available information that the viewers can use to contact them. The creator of each post then challenges the viewers to obtain nude photos of these girls by ANY MEANS NECESSARY. This means...   AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT... Constantly calling, texting, messaging these girls on every social media platform  SEXTORTION AND BLACKMAIL... Threatening to spread false sexual stories or send stolen photos to their friends, family, school or job if they don't send nude photos or perform sexual acts PHYSICAL THREATS... Threatening to show up at their house, their school or their job STALKING... Actually showing up at their house, their school or their job These people do NOT stop. These girls are terrorized for weeks, months, years. Even changing their contact information does not remove the threat because now, these random people who are ALLOWED BY THESE WEBSITES to remain COMPLETELY ANONYMOUS know where they live, where they go to school, where they work, who their family and friends are.  These girls can be your neighbors, your friends, your girlfriend, your sister, your daughter, your mother, you. They are normal people all around you who do not deserve the humiliation and torture that is perpetuated by allowing such EASY access to websites like these that KNOWINGLY let this happen to HUNDREDS, IF NOT THOUSANDS, OF GIRLS EVERY SINGLE DAY. SOME OF THESE VICTIMS ARE CHILDREN. These websites are allowing the distribution of child pornography and facilitating sexual exploitation of children. SOME OF THESE GIRLS ARE RAPE VICTIMS. There is graphic and irrefutable evidence of sexual assault, molestation and rape being posted, shared, traded and used for blackmail. ... AND ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IS BEING DONE ABOUT IT. These websites are not being used to catch criminals, they are being used to encourage and facilitate MORE criminal activity. Nothing is being reported, nothing is being removed, everyone is allowed to remain anonymous, no one is being banned from posting..... except people like me. I was reported and banned from posting on these websites for telling a young girl to go to the police and press charges. How is this allowed to happen? Why are we not holding these websites accountable? I realize that just shutting these two websites down will not solve the problem, but it's a start. By removing ANON-IB and 4CHAN, we will be eliminating thousands of names and photos, freeing at least some of these girls from their perpetrators and making it more difficult for the hundreds, if not thousands of criminals that have become comfortable using these two particular websites because of the security and anonymity it provides for them. We will be making a statement that this is only the first step, and that we will continue to fight every single one of them until all of our girls are safe.  Please help me by signing and sharing this petition. Help me convince our government to eliminate ANON-IB and 4CHAN.  Thank you, Tamara Passeggio

Tamara Passeggio
116 supporters