Donald J Trump
Petition to Department of Justice
Request the Department of Justice Obtain an Injunction Against Electoral College
On December 19, 2016, the Electors of the Electoral College will cast their ballots to determine who will become president of the United States. Because there is significant cause (more fully described below*) to suspect this recent presidential election was illegally subverted, either singly or in collusion, by one or more individuals, federal agencies, political parties, candidates, foreign or domestic interests, the petitioners hereby respectfully request an injunction against the Electors of the Electoral College barring them from affirming any presidential candidate until after a full and impartial investigation, conducted in a transparent, non-partisan, professional way, assures the court and the American people that no illegal actions designed to subvert the national election conducted this past November 8th, 2016 succeeded in their intended illegal purpose. Petitioners believe this injunction and subsequent investigation are in the best interests of the nation. They believe such injunction is necessary to preserve the confidence of the American people in the integrity of the American election process, give legitimacy to the next president of the United States (and cast all aspersion or doubt as to that legitimacy), and strengthen the citizens’ faith in the due process of law. Further, petitioners believe this action will demonstrate to our allies and any hostile interests that this nation will not tolerate interference in its democratic processes and will do all in its power to ferret out criminal activity intended to manipulate, intimidate, suborn or in any way fraudulently impact the American electoral process. *Note: This petition is predicated solely on a reasonable examination and belief in the integrity of numerous statements that have been publicly made alleging that it is a very real possibility that the election could have been illegally manipulated by a foreign nation and foreign corporation (Wikileaks) known to be hostile to this nation’s interests. These statements have been publicly reported (after professional, credible internal vetting as to their accuracy) by a significant number of the nation's largest and most credible news sources (in print, online, and on television, cable and radio news), such as, but not limited to: The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Newsweek Magazine, Huffington Post, Forbes, Bloomberg, and employees of MSNBC, CNN, CBS, and NPR. Moreover, the candidates themselves and their closest surrogates, as well as currently elected and serving officials, have told the citizens of this country that there is a strong possibility the election was being tampered with by forces hostile to this country. However, all of the above sources notwithstanding, we offer as additional proof of possible foul play, Mr. Trump’s own statements. The Republican candidate repeatedly stated in unequivocal terms to the American people (and world at large) that this election was either going to “be rigged” or in fact was “was rigged” (evidence to this is in the public domain and easily verified). Therefore, the candidate who now appears to hold the most Electoral votes has repeatedly called into question the integrity of his own election and this certainly gives the American voters serious cause to doubt the legitimacy of the election and, therefore, the legitimacy of his presidency unless otherwise thoroughly proven otherwise. This petition has been drafted in her own words by the Rev. Maureen G. Ausbrook. It has been drafted free of outside influence or any coercion. It represents, within the limits of reasonable possibility, what she has personally witnessed throughout the course of the election campaign. Having drafted this document she will put it online and attempt to obtain a minimum of 10,000 signatures from duly registered voters. She respectfully requests the DOJ and any federal court judge to recognize she is not an attorney and she requests that any errors in the drafting of this document be treated fairly with full understanding that she is not an attorney and she begs the DOJ and court to not find any clerical error or lack of legal wording to be cause for dismissal. She submits this document online November 12, 2016, with herself as petitioner and on behalf of all other people who subsequently sign and make themselves additional petitioners. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Rev Maureen G. AusbrookKennebunk, ME
Petition to The American People
Charge the Democrat Party with Sedition
It is time for all Patriotic Americans to make our stand. We have had enough of the corrupt, treasonous, obstructionist, hypocritical Democrat Party trying to destroy our country and overthrow our lawfully elected President and his Administration. As elected officials the Democrats only job is to work for the American people and for our country. However, it has become apparent that the Democrats no longer intend to WORK at all except to obstruct our government, prevent work from being done, spread lies and propaganda about our elected Administration and incite violence and resistance. This is Sedition.. Treason... and the Democrat Party needs to be held accountable. This is part of a three point plan to go on the attack against the Democrats - Petition to the American People, Take our Movement to the Conservative Media "Fox, the Blaze, Breitbart", and file charges "Legally" through the court system against the Democrats for Sedition/Treason. Americans.. Its time to make our stand. Sign this petition and join me in this fight.
Petition to United Nations, Donald Trump, Barack Obama
Stop the slavery of Africans in Libya
Africans are being sold and beaten in Libya like animals! They’re people too, my people! Treating these people worse than animals shows the direction this world is headed. Us Americans can help them even if it’s just as small as signing this petition.
Petition to Donald Trump
Banning preordained arbitration of contracts
Contracts in the United States, particularly terms of service agreements, have begun to with an overwelming frequency regulate any arbitration of the contract. Most concerning is the requirement that any disputes be settled out of court, tho I'd be remiss not to bring up no longer haveing contacts agreed to, taking "use of the service as consent" and "changing the contract at anytime without notice or update to the users without written request" These are not the only points of arbitration that have been curtailed of late but a vast majority of companies include all three of these elements in their terms of service and the consequences are staggering. To be clear about why this is a bad thing for those who don't just magically know things. By having knowledge of this petition you agree to sign it, Your memory there of serves as a legally binding agreement. I will be changing the content of this agreement willy-nilly. Should you request an update it will be post dated as otherwise it would be out of date by the time you receive it. Once received you should have an indeterminate amount of time until it's valid for no more than a nanosecond. If you have any issues with this contract you will begin any arbitration by writing it on a $20 bill and sending it to me. Should you need more space to write use more $20 bills. If you feel your complaints are not being heard try $50s and then $100s until your satisfied I don't read them before spending them. In the event of any court arbitration you agree to conclude in our favor by virtue of your being aware of the contract as it is within the petition it refers to. TL;DR? as it stands with our contract law people are free. Freely acquirable as assets for a song and a dance or less. By signing this petition you're asking our current president Donald Trump to prevent these and future abuses of contract law by banning the inclusion of constraints upon arbitration of contracts within any and all contracts between any number of people. This will not for example damage prenuptial agreements as they are not an agreement regarding the arbitration of a contract. They are an agreement regarding the dissolution of a contract. Specifically what happens when that contract is dissolved. It would however for example prevent prenuptial agreements from requiring therapy before being dissolved. Frankly any way I look at this it is not just a positive but an important change. I hope you all agree, and don't hesitate to voice questions or concerns. I sincerely thank you for your consideration. John C. Bol.
Petition to U.S. Senate, Kamala Harris, John McCain, Dean Heller, Susan Collins, Joni Ernst, Shelley Capito, Rand Paul, Lisa Murkowski
Tell the Senate to vote NO on Graham-Cassidy Healthcare Bill
We call on Senate to vote no on the Graham-Cassidy bill. Passage of this bill would result in millions of Americans across the country losing healthcare coverage. Approval of this bill would also result in massive cuts to the Medicaid program, sharply reducing or eliminating coverage for people who have disabilities, individuals living in poverty, and other vulnerable persons. We call upon Congress to work in an orderly, non-partisan, and meaningful way to find solutions that address problems with the Affordable Care Act that result in improved healthcare for all Americans.
Petition to Pepsi Bottling, NFL, Anheueser-Busch , Barclaycard US, bose, Bridgestone, Campbell Soup Company, Castrol, Courtyard Marriott, Marriott, dairy management inc, Dannon, Extreme Networks, FedEx, Frito-Lay, Gatorade, Hyundai Motor America, Mars Snackfood, Microsoft, Nationwide Insurance, Papa John's, News America, PepsiCo, Procter & Gamble, Quaker, Verizon, Visa, USAA
Force NFL Players to respect the practices of the country that provides their lifestyles
The people of the United States provide NFL Players exorbitant lifestyles to play a game for our entertainment and enjoyment. However, they have decided to use their workplace to wage protest against the very symbols and practices that are at the backbone of the system that allows them such excess simply to play a game. Ordinary citizens that did the same in their workplace would suffer disciplinary actions up to, and including, termination of their employment. These are the people that buy the tickets and merchandise that allow for NFL players to live lives of excess that make the lives of their supporters seem like those of mere peasants. We are calling for a boycott of all companies and their subsidiaries that support the NFL Players Association until the organization institutes and enforces policies to force players to stand for our national anthem and national observances as well as enact disciplinary actions that are strictly enforced for those that continue to violate the trust of the country that provides their lifestyle. The people of this effort recognize and respect the value of our rights to protest for the changes we seek in our world but also recognize that the players of the NFL are no different, or better, than the rest of the society they entertain by playing a game. We simply ask that they do it on their time. We seek an immediate and unrelenting boycott of the following companies that support the NFL Players Association with further action to follow if our demands are not met. The NFLPA sponsors are: Anheuser-Busch Barclaycard US Bose Bridgestone Campbell's Soup Company Castrol Courtyard Marriott Dairy Management, Inc. (Fuel Up to Play 60) Dannon Extreme Networks FedEx Frito-Lay Gatorade Hyundai Motor America Mars Snackfood Microsoft Nationwide News America Papa John's Pepsi Procter & Gamble Quaker Verizon Visa USAA Join us as we refuse to spend our hard earned money on the products and services brought to market by these companies and their vast network of subsidiaries.For more information on our cause or to obtain a complete listing of the network of companies and subsidiaries responsible for supporting the NFL Players Association please visit our Facebook page at The Edge Radio.