É inadmissível que galinhas continuem a ser exploradas e torturadas. No meu cardápio não entra ovos de galinhas engaioladas. E minha família toda apóia essa causa.
OS ANIMAIS SÃO SERES SENCIENTES E MERECEM AMOR E RESPEITO; SENTEM DOR E FRIO. TUDO O QUE OS HUMANOS SENTAM
SOU VEGETARIANA POR AMOR AOS ANIMAIS E SÓ COMO OVOS DE GALINHAS CRIADAS LIVRES
Não há evolução, não há mundo melhor, sem inclusão, acolhimento, amor e respeito aos animais! O mínimo, para empresas, que lucram muito às custas de muitos animais, é respeitá-los como eles merecem! Ovos, somente de galinhas soltas!
As someone who is lactose-free and gluten-free, has several other food sensitivities, (almond and soy), I was extremely disappointed to hear Starbucks is no longer carying lactose-free milk. Your Oat milk is not certified gluten-free, making it unsafe. Of all the alternative dairy options, getting rid of the lactose-free milk makes the LEAST amount of sense. All of the non-dairy options drastically changes the taste of drinks. For me, and countless others, due to allergies or sensitivities coconut milk is the only other "option" we can safely consume – who the heck wants to drink a Chai latte with coconut milk?! It's not uncommon to have multiple food sensitivities and this decision is alienating a very large portion of your customer base. I'd rather see a dairy-free alternative that I can't consume removed from the menu. My family and I won't be back so long as LF milk isn't on the menu.
As a person with Celiac Disease and nut-allergies, lactose-free milk is the only safe option for me at Starbucks. Oat milk is great, but not all brands are gluten-free. If LF milk isn't going to be offered, then commit to only serving certified-GF oat milk.
As someone who’s lactose intolerant and doesn’t like the taste of milk alternatives, it’s extremely disappointing Starbucks removed lactose free milk! I would go there for coffee because they were the only chain that carried it. Not going to Starbucks anymore now that they don’t have it.