SMART is doing a new round of public outreach about changing the train station location from the Depot on Hudson to Vine Street. However, SMART only analyzed the Depot station in both the 2006 FEIR and in the December 2025 Addendum.  It did not analyze the later-proposed Vine Street station location.

If SMART now proposes moving the station to Vine Street, CEQA requires SMART to determine whether that change would create new significant environmental effects or substantially increase previously identified effects.

Put simply, the legal question would be whether the change creates new significant environmental effects or substantially worsens effects previously analyzed. A §15162 inquiry would include whether that relocation causes materially different effects involving things such as 

• traffic patterns and intersections
• parking capacity or spillover parking
• pedestrian/bicycle circulation and safety
• station access, noise or vibration receptors
• construction effects
• other environmental effects that were not analyzed—or are substantially more severe than those previously analyzed.

The most effective way to demand a new CEQA study is to show public support for it. The more voices, the more likely it will succeed.

So if you want to demand that SMART honors the decision to build the station at the Depot location, especially since it was already chosen by the City Council in 2024 as the preferred location sign this petition to support a new  supplemental CEQA study for the areas that SMART didn't analyze including

• changing the station location from the Depot to Vine Street
• preventing the seasonal dam from being installed
• excessive construction noise 7 days a week and potentially at night at decibels up to 135
• river recreation users

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SMART’s own Board discussion confirms the problem. 

At its March 18, 2026 meeting, a Board member acknowledged that the Healdsburg Extension required new environmental analysis because rail operations today differ from what was assumed in the 2006 Environmental Impact Report—and then asked whether, if SMART relies on a new CEQA exemption (Senate Bill 71), that would prevent the public from challenging those differences.

General Counsel replied that “the intent is there…given if it’s in our right of way.”

This exchange shows that SMART knows the 2006 environmental report does not reflect current conditions, knows its newer analysis could be challenged, and is considering using exemptions to avoid that scrutiny rather than fix the gaps.

Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), that is backwards: agencies must fully study and disclose impacts before approval—not rely on outdated analysis and then seek to shield it from review.

The Background

On December 17, 2025, SMART’s Board approved its final environmental review despite two critical flaws:

1. It repeatedly relied on conclusions from the 2006 EIR—even though that study never analyzed the Healdsburg extension.
2. It failed to meaningfully analyze a known and obvious reality: people use the river under the bridge. 

River use here is not hypothetical. River’s Edge Kayak and Canoe alone launches about 4,000 people each summer, all of whom pass beneath the bridge. Sonoma County Regional Parks reports roughly 65,000 visitors to Veterans Memorial Beach during peak season. Together, that’s nearly 69,000 people using this stretch of river every year. 

The Core Problem

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires agencies to study real-world conditions before approving a project. That includes how people actually use the environment.

But SMART never meaningfully analyzed the kayakers, swimmers, paddleboarders, anglers, and families who rely on this stretch of the Russian River.

That omission matters. It means:

1. Decision-makers were not given a full picture
2. The public could not meaningfully participate
3. Claims of “no new or more severe impacts” are unsupported

Courts have made clear that this kind of informational gap violates CEQA’s core purpose: to inform decision-makers and the public, reduce harm, and prevent avoidable damage before it happens.

SMART Knows That The River Is Not In Its Right-Of-Way

SMART’s right-of-way is limited to the tracks and bridge structure. The Russian River itself—including the heavily used stretch between the bridge and Veterans Memorial Beach—is a public waterway.

The bridge may be SMART’s—but the river is public, and that’s where the impacts happen.

Impacts to this area must be analyzed as impacts to public use—not minimized as impacts confined to railroad property.

 
SMART is relying on a study that never looked at this location

SMART claims impacts are “less than significant” based on the 2006 EIR.

But that study:

Did not include the Healdsburg extension 
Did not analyze river use at this bridge 
Did not evaluate construction impacts in this location 
You can’t claim impacts are insignificant in Healdsburg based on a study that never looked at Healdsburg.

 
Bottom Line

SMART’s own Board discussion confirms what the record already shows:
conditions today are different, impacts are being newly analyzed, and those impacts could be challenged.

Instead of addressing those differences with a full and honest environmental review, SMART is attempting to rely on outdated analysis and pursue exemptions to avoid scrutiny.

If the people using the river were not studied, then the impacts to the river were not studied—and CEQA requires a complete review before this project can move forward.

We’re not opposed to the train—we’re opposed to cutting corners.If this project moves forward, it must follow the California Environmental Quality Act and fully study its real impacts.

Take action now:
Step 1: Sign this petition to demand a full CEQA review that actually studies impacts to river users before construction begins.

Step 2: Show up and speak at the May 20, 2026 SMART Board meeting—the last meeting before the June 2 vote. Your voice matters.