the abuse of children must not be allowed to continue!!

The Issue

Note. 9 months after this photo was taken this little girl was evidenced to be "unsteady on her feet"

The agenda of this petition is to ensure that children are protected and to reduce the extent of child abuse that occurs in the UK. There is a legal loophole that is being exploited and has resulted in the undesirable consequence of 1,000's children that are being abused whilst residing in the UK every day. In civial cases the fact that Legal teams are only required to submit evidence that supports their case is the very same justification that legally allows the social services to conceal evidence of positive of parenting, evidence that the care that the parent provided was of a higher standard than that of the social services and most devastatingly evidence of children being abused in care from the family court. I'm not going to lie of course I would like to see my child again but that is not the reason for this petition. if this petition is successful it will ensure that it is accepted and results in the fact that my child gets the required help and therapy to allow her to fully recover, which the social services currently depriving her of, in addition, she will get the justice that she deserves for the inhumane treatment my daughter had to endure whilst she was a ward of the state which is unforgivable. if this petition is successful it will help eliminate child abuse in the UK because it will ensure that courts are supplied with all the relevant significant evidence to allow the court to adequately decipher as to how to guarantee that the welfare of the child who is subject to proceedings is, in fact, the main priority.

In my case NOTE there was no procedural irregularity that took place.

My child was happily thriving mentally, emotionally, and physically whilst in the care of her biological family happily surpassing many of her developmental milestones. my child was removed from my care because of future risk.

It was legal for the social services to omit several reports of my child being physically attacked in care because it did not support their case for adoption. initially, they omitted 5 of 10 reports in a two month period, 4 months of evidence was absent of which the 5 five missing reports of my child being attacked in care were included.  it was legal for the social services to omit 11 of 11 months of evidence from the adoption hearing of which factually evidenced that I had a wonderful relationship with my child, evidence that the care i provided was "good enough" even evidence that the care I provided my child was of a higher standard than what she received whilst she was a ward of the state and 10 reports of my child being physically attacked in care because it threatened the social services case for adoption. this should no longer be legal.

in addition i have now been told by the social services that of this 11 months of evidence that there is only 4 months that is still in existance, further of this existing evidence, every piece still factually evidence that the care i provided was of a higher standard than the socail services.

why it is still normal and regular proceedure for the social services to "lose" 7 months of evidence???

The grounds for separation was because “I was highly critical” or rather that I objected to an older autistic child who through no fault of her own continuously randomly physically attacked my 16-month-old beautiful happy cleaver sweet little girl whilst in the mother and baby foster placement that the social services had placed us in. (note i do not hold the 5-year-old autistic child responsible) this resulted in my child being left in that particular placement for 9 months where she was attacked so frequently that after this 9 month period my child was considered to be a deeply a psychology scared child. (MY CHILD SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN LEFT IN THAT PLACEMENT.!!!! IF THE SS HAD BEEN LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO SUBMIT THE 10 REPORTS OF MY CHILD BEING PHYSICALLY ATTACKED IN CARE TO THE COURT MY CHILD WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABUSED....FACT!!). If the case of the social services is to prioritize the welfare of my child in the short, long, and medium-term how is any of this legal? if the child who is subject to proceedings welfare is indeed the main concern then why is there no system in place that allows reports of children being abused in care to be adequately logged

the children that are involved with the social services by definition are the most vulnerable members of society, and they must be protected, all I am asking is for it to be accepted that there is a pressing need for a law to be created that makes it illegal to conceal any evidence of children being abused or neglected from the family court, regardless of mitigating circumstances, regardless of the implications and regardless of the status of who the perpetrators of the abuse/neglect are.

social services had a duty of care to my child, they intentionally subjected my daughter to physical abuse when they concealed the evidence of my child being physically attacked in care from the court, condemning my child to 9 months of pain, isolation, and fear because it supported their case to forcably adopt my beautiful sweet clever little girl, the social services had full parental responsibility for my child throughout that 9-month time frame. I believe they should be charged with gross negligence/criminal negligence at the very least

it needs to be a criminal offence for the social services to conceal any evidence of children being abused or neglected in care from the court

there needs to be a system that allows evidence of children being abused/neglected in care to be accurately logged.

there needs to be a system that allows reports written by those commissioned by the social services (every date of every foster carers/contact supervisors/social workers visits/mother, baby placement reports ect... ie all the factual evidence produced for the purposes of the social services and the family court) as well as any medical NHS reports and police reports that the social services have access to justified because the case is to prioritize the child's welfare, regardless as to whether or not it is included in the court bundle, to be safely logged in a method that they can be retrieved and supplied to the parent directly in a timely manner and in addition his or her legal team prior to the final hearing. also that the case bundle is delivered the parents directly on the day before the first day of the final hearing. if the social services are unable to do this then the final hearing must be adjourned until these tasks can be accomplished.

Also within the duration of this case, the social services have ignored the directions, orders, judgments, and subsequent letters from the court which is a normal and regular procedure, which is confusing to me.

if the social services are allowed the privilege to utalise the police to enforce court orders then the parents should be given that same privilage?

Please keep signing and please keep sharing, please do not remove any signatures, however, something has come to my attention and I am honest. and irritatingly I always do the right thing.  ok so there are definitely things with this company that I am not happy about, however, I have realized that they do provide a service that is needed, they allow everybody's story to be heard and to gain support from around the world in a manner that is easily reproducible for anybody that needs evidence of that support. 

please understand that if donated, I will not receive a penny therefore that is not my business, personally I would rather you sign and share anyway. If you want to subscribe then that's your business, also, if you want to start a petition be my guest, if you want to donate to any petition on change.org, that's your business, although, make sure you CALL YOUR BANK to ensure that your donation only comes out of your bank once and doesn't come out of your bank next month and thereafter etc....bless

P.S. I am only saying this because I do not want supporters to find out  at some point in the future that they have been paying monthly donations ever since they signed my petition

 

 

avatar of the starter
kazzie dePetition Starter

4,256

The Issue

Note. 9 months after this photo was taken this little girl was evidenced to be "unsteady on her feet"

The agenda of this petition is to ensure that children are protected and to reduce the extent of child abuse that occurs in the UK. There is a legal loophole that is being exploited and has resulted in the undesirable consequence of 1,000's children that are being abused whilst residing in the UK every day. In civial cases the fact that Legal teams are only required to submit evidence that supports their case is the very same justification that legally allows the social services to conceal evidence of positive of parenting, evidence that the care that the parent provided was of a higher standard than that of the social services and most devastatingly evidence of children being abused in care from the family court. I'm not going to lie of course I would like to see my child again but that is not the reason for this petition. if this petition is successful it will ensure that it is accepted and results in the fact that my child gets the required help and therapy to allow her to fully recover, which the social services currently depriving her of, in addition, she will get the justice that she deserves for the inhumane treatment my daughter had to endure whilst she was a ward of the state which is unforgivable. if this petition is successful it will help eliminate child abuse in the UK because it will ensure that courts are supplied with all the relevant significant evidence to allow the court to adequately decipher as to how to guarantee that the welfare of the child who is subject to proceedings is, in fact, the main priority.

In my case NOTE there was no procedural irregularity that took place.

My child was happily thriving mentally, emotionally, and physically whilst in the care of her biological family happily surpassing many of her developmental milestones. my child was removed from my care because of future risk.

It was legal for the social services to omit several reports of my child being physically attacked in care because it did not support their case for adoption. initially, they omitted 5 of 10 reports in a two month period, 4 months of evidence was absent of which the 5 five missing reports of my child being attacked in care were included.  it was legal for the social services to omit 11 of 11 months of evidence from the adoption hearing of which factually evidenced that I had a wonderful relationship with my child, evidence that the care i provided was "good enough" even evidence that the care I provided my child was of a higher standard than what she received whilst she was a ward of the state and 10 reports of my child being physically attacked in care because it threatened the social services case for adoption. this should no longer be legal.

in addition i have now been told by the social services that of this 11 months of evidence that there is only 4 months that is still in existance, further of this existing evidence, every piece still factually evidence that the care i provided was of a higher standard than the socail services.

why it is still normal and regular proceedure for the social services to "lose" 7 months of evidence???

The grounds for separation was because “I was highly critical” or rather that I objected to an older autistic child who through no fault of her own continuously randomly physically attacked my 16-month-old beautiful happy cleaver sweet little girl whilst in the mother and baby foster placement that the social services had placed us in. (note i do not hold the 5-year-old autistic child responsible) this resulted in my child being left in that particular placement for 9 months where she was attacked so frequently that after this 9 month period my child was considered to be a deeply a psychology scared child. (MY CHILD SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN LEFT IN THAT PLACEMENT.!!!! IF THE SS HAD BEEN LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO SUBMIT THE 10 REPORTS OF MY CHILD BEING PHYSICALLY ATTACKED IN CARE TO THE COURT MY CHILD WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABUSED....FACT!!). If the case of the social services is to prioritize the welfare of my child in the short, long, and medium-term how is any of this legal? if the child who is subject to proceedings welfare is indeed the main concern then why is there no system in place that allows reports of children being abused in care to be adequately logged

the children that are involved with the social services by definition are the most vulnerable members of society, and they must be protected, all I am asking is for it to be accepted that there is a pressing need for a law to be created that makes it illegal to conceal any evidence of children being abused or neglected from the family court, regardless of mitigating circumstances, regardless of the implications and regardless of the status of who the perpetrators of the abuse/neglect are.

social services had a duty of care to my child, they intentionally subjected my daughter to physical abuse when they concealed the evidence of my child being physically attacked in care from the court, condemning my child to 9 months of pain, isolation, and fear because it supported their case to forcably adopt my beautiful sweet clever little girl, the social services had full parental responsibility for my child throughout that 9-month time frame. I believe they should be charged with gross negligence/criminal negligence at the very least

it needs to be a criminal offence for the social services to conceal any evidence of children being abused or neglected in care from the court

there needs to be a system that allows evidence of children being abused/neglected in care to be accurately logged.

there needs to be a system that allows reports written by those commissioned by the social services (every date of every foster carers/contact supervisors/social workers visits/mother, baby placement reports ect... ie all the factual evidence produced for the purposes of the social services and the family court) as well as any medical NHS reports and police reports that the social services have access to justified because the case is to prioritize the child's welfare, regardless as to whether or not it is included in the court bundle, to be safely logged in a method that they can be retrieved and supplied to the parent directly in a timely manner and in addition his or her legal team prior to the final hearing. also that the case bundle is delivered the parents directly on the day before the first day of the final hearing. if the social services are unable to do this then the final hearing must be adjourned until these tasks can be accomplished.

Also within the duration of this case, the social services have ignored the directions, orders, judgments, and subsequent letters from the court which is a normal and regular procedure, which is confusing to me.

if the social services are allowed the privilege to utalise the police to enforce court orders then the parents should be given that same privilage?

Please keep signing and please keep sharing, please do not remove any signatures, however, something has come to my attention and I am honest. and irritatingly I always do the right thing.  ok so there are definitely things with this company that I am not happy about, however, I have realized that they do provide a service that is needed, they allow everybody's story to be heard and to gain support from around the world in a manner that is easily reproducible for anybody that needs evidence of that support. 

please understand that if donated, I will not receive a penny therefore that is not my business, personally I would rather you sign and share anyway. If you want to subscribe then that's your business, also, if you want to start a petition be my guest, if you want to donate to any petition on change.org, that's your business, although, make sure you CALL YOUR BANK to ensure that your donation only comes out of your bank once and doesn't come out of your bank next month and thereafter etc....bless

P.S. I am only saying this because I do not want supporters to find out  at some point in the future that they have been paying monthly donations ever since they signed my petition

 

 

avatar of the starter
kazzie dePetition Starter

The Decision Makers

Prof M.V. Rajeev Gowda
Chairman AICC Research Dept; National Spokesperson AICC; Ex-MP, Rajya Sabha from Karnataka
Theresa May MP
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Leader of the Conservative Party
Matthew Hancock MP
Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General
Esther McVey MP
Minister of State for Employment
Boris Johnson
Prime Minister

Petition Updates