Fix The Lack of 64-bit Firmware on Early Intel Atom Bay Trail Tablets

The Issue

Millions of 64-bit tablets using Intel Atom "Bay Trail" processors cannot run in 64-bit mode. This was due to a bug in Windows that has since been fixed. We are asking the tablet vendors to offer a firmware update that corrects this.

When Intel launched "Bay Trail" Atom tablets, Microsoft supported them with a new feature called InstaGo. At launch, it was a bit buggy. Microsoft couldn't support it in 64-bit mode. So, initially, tablets with Bay Trail processors shipped with 32-bit firmware.

That means that, even though you have a 64-bit tablet, it cannot run 64-bit apps. It's stuck in 32-bit firmware and thus acts as a 32-bit device.

Why is this bad? First, you can't run most Linux operating systems. Even in 32-bit mode, thanks to most Linux platforms not supporting UEFI32-only devices. Second, future Windows versions may require a 64-bit environment. But most importantly, you lose the benefits of 64-bit, including its performance increases.

Microsoft has since offered Windows 8.1 Update, which fixes InstaGo on 64-bit. There's no reason for these vendors to not do the right thing and update their tablets with a UEFI64 firmware update.

Most PC makers seem poised to offer new/identical tablets with 64-bit firmware. Dell and ASUS have already started this. We are asking that our devies not be hindered by a firmware limitation that could easily, and quickly, be fixed with a simple update.

avatar of the starter
B SPetition Starter
This petition had 752 supporters

The Issue

Millions of 64-bit tablets using Intel Atom "Bay Trail" processors cannot run in 64-bit mode. This was due to a bug in Windows that has since been fixed. We are asking the tablet vendors to offer a firmware update that corrects this.

When Intel launched "Bay Trail" Atom tablets, Microsoft supported them with a new feature called InstaGo. At launch, it was a bit buggy. Microsoft couldn't support it in 64-bit mode. So, initially, tablets with Bay Trail processors shipped with 32-bit firmware.

That means that, even though you have a 64-bit tablet, it cannot run 64-bit apps. It's stuck in 32-bit firmware and thus acts as a 32-bit device.

Why is this bad? First, you can't run most Linux operating systems. Even in 32-bit mode, thanks to most Linux platforms not supporting UEFI32-only devices. Second, future Windows versions may require a 64-bit environment. But most importantly, you lose the benefits of 64-bit, including its performance increases.

Microsoft has since offered Windows 8.1 Update, which fixes InstaGo on 64-bit. There's no reason for these vendors to not do the right thing and update their tablets with a UEFI64 firmware update.

Most PC makers seem poised to offer new/identical tablets with 64-bit firmware. Dell and ASUS have already started this. We are asking that our devies not be hindered by a firmware limitation that could easily, and quickly, be fixed with a simple update.

avatar of the starter
B SPetition Starter

Petition Closed

This petition had 752 supporters

Share this petition

The Decision Makers

Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and Toshiba
Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP, Lenovo, and Toshiba
Petition updates