Remove flock surveillance cameras from Greensboro

Remove flock surveillance cameras from Greensboro

Recent signers:
Scott and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Flock is a private third-party company contracted by cities and counties like Greensboro to surveil local communities and utilize AI technology to profile and monitor behavior. This technology gravely impedes basic human rights and our right to privacy. As a resident of Greensboro, I find this deeply concerning. The right to privacy is a cornerstone of our freedom and autonomy, yet these surveillance systems are undermining this fundamental right.

The implementation of Flock surveillance cameras in our community raises a plethora of critical questions. What exactly are these cameras monitoring? Who has access to this information, and for how long? There is an alarming lack of transparency about what data is being collected and how it might be used in the future. The potential for misuse is vast, and it cultivates a sense of being constantly watched by an entity whose accountability to the public remains unclear.

Research shows that increased surveillance does not necessarily correlate with a decrease in crime rates, casting further doubt on the efficacy of such measures. An article from The New York Times highlighted how cities with heavy surveillance equipment still struggle with crime, proving that this invasive measure may not yield the intended results. Instead, it sows distrust between citizens and local authorities and encroaches on our personal freedoms.

Moreover, the use of AI technology to profile and monitor behavior can lead to unintentional biases and discrimination, as has been demonstrated in numerous studies on AI ethics. Systems that are built without transparency are prone to perpetuating stereotypes and could result in incorrect profiling based on skewed data interpretations.

In place of these invasive systems, there are more effective and respectful ways of ensuring the security and well-being of Greensboro residents. Funding community-based programs, fostering partnerships between community members and law enforcement, and investing in educational outreach have all been found to improve public safety without sacrificing privacy.

We urge the city of Greensboro and its constituents to reconsider their alliance with Flock Surveillance and take steps towards a solution that prioritizes the privacy and trust of its citizens. Privacy is not a privilege, but a right, and it is imperative that we defend it against unnecessary and invasive technologies.

Please join me in calling for the removal of Flock surveillance cameras from Greensboro by signing this petition. Together, we can demand accountability and advocate for our community's right to privacy. Our autonomy and freedom depend on it.

79

Let’s get to 100 signatures!
Petitions with 1,000+ supporters are 5x more likely to win!
Recent signers:
Scott and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Flock is a private third-party company contracted by cities and counties like Greensboro to surveil local communities and utilize AI technology to profile and monitor behavior. This technology gravely impedes basic human rights and our right to privacy. As a resident of Greensboro, I find this deeply concerning. The right to privacy is a cornerstone of our freedom and autonomy, yet these surveillance systems are undermining this fundamental right.

The implementation of Flock surveillance cameras in our community raises a plethora of critical questions. What exactly are these cameras monitoring? Who has access to this information, and for how long? There is an alarming lack of transparency about what data is being collected and how it might be used in the future. The potential for misuse is vast, and it cultivates a sense of being constantly watched by an entity whose accountability to the public remains unclear.

Research shows that increased surveillance does not necessarily correlate with a decrease in crime rates, casting further doubt on the efficacy of such measures. An article from The New York Times highlighted how cities with heavy surveillance equipment still struggle with crime, proving that this invasive measure may not yield the intended results. Instead, it sows distrust between citizens and local authorities and encroaches on our personal freedoms.

Moreover, the use of AI technology to profile and monitor behavior can lead to unintentional biases and discrimination, as has been demonstrated in numerous studies on AI ethics. Systems that are built without transparency are prone to perpetuating stereotypes and could result in incorrect profiling based on skewed data interpretations.

In place of these invasive systems, there are more effective and respectful ways of ensuring the security and well-being of Greensboro residents. Funding community-based programs, fostering partnerships between community members and law enforcement, and investing in educational outreach have all been found to improve public safety without sacrificing privacy.

We urge the city of Greensboro and its constituents to reconsider their alliance with Flock Surveillance and take steps towards a solution that prioritizes the privacy and trust of its citizens. Privacy is not a privilege, but a right, and it is imperative that we defend it against unnecessary and invasive technologies.

Please join me in calling for the removal of Flock surveillance cameras from Greensboro by signing this petition. Together, we can demand accountability and advocate for our community's right to privacy. Our autonomy and freedom depend on it.

The Decision Makers

Greensboro City Council
8 Members
Tammi Thurm
Greensboro City Council - District 5
Crystal Black
Greensboro City Council - District 1
Cecile Crawford
Greensboro City Council - District 2
Marikay Abuzuaiter
Greensboro City Mayor

Petition Updates