Mandate Gender Dysphoria Diagnosis for Cross-Sex Hormones and Surgeries
The Issue
From personal experience as a transsexual, I have witnessed the evolution of transition procedures over the last five to six years. With the advent of Self ID, it has become significantly easier to transition, to the point of trivializing the authentic struggles of individuals living with gender dysphoria. With this ease has come an increase in individuals identifying as Non-Binary or other genders that don't even mean anything, which further dilutes the severe reality of gender dysphoria, making it appear mundane by comparison. Their transition just involved growing their hair out and removing their breasts, rather pointlessly, and lumped in as 'trans' when it doesn't mean anything in relation to it, not even close. The detrimental impacts stemming from less stringent criterias involved in hormonal and surgerical transitions have been known to cause a surge in cases of detransition, most of which occur after surgical procedures, leaving individuals physically and emotionally marred.
Prior to the advent of Self ID, stringent diagnostic criteria existed for gender dysphoria. It required a careful evaluation by trained professionals who deeply understood the psychological and physical reality of those genuinely struggling with their identity. This practice ensured that those opting for hormone therapies or surgeries had a clearer understanding and fuller commitment to transition, significantly reducing subsequent health repercussions and detransitions.
By mandating a gender dysphoria diagnosis for cross-sex hormones and surgeries, we can protect individuals from hasty decisions that may later result in regret or health issues. We can also preserve the integrity and respect of those wrestling with genuine gender dysphoria, without trivializing their journey with easier transition procedures. It is not about restricting rights but about ensuring the careful, dutiful, and informed decision-making process.
Please sign this petition to urge the medical community to return to the stringent diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria and ensure that the process of gender transition reveres and respects the severity of this condition. Together, let’s reinforce informed decision-making and protect the authenticity of genuine gender struggles.
It's just not right to make such risks and also be a factor in futhering the struggles of people who do genuinely suffer from the rare disorder that makes them feel like they were genuinely born in the wrong body, and also makes them feel why this is the way they can deal with it. We also do not want children going through all this, as it has fed the idea that we groom children into making hasty decisions at such a young age. Let it be soley an adult thing as well.
The old critera worked fine, and also had a safer and more fulfilling results and doctors also knew when to turn a patient away, and if they should desist, this is the criteria made by Dr John Randall:
1. Persistent Cross-Gender Identification: Patients had to demonstrate a consistent and insistent identification with the opposite gender over a prolonged period. This was not a transient or recent desire but a deeply ingrained aspect of their identity.
2. Significant Distress: The distress caused by the mismatch between assigned gender and gender identity had to be significant, impacting social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. This distress was known as gender dysphoria.
3. Psychological Evaluation: Extensive psychological evaluations were conducted to rule out other mental health conditions that could explain the desire for gender transition. This involved long-term therapy and assessments by multiple professionals.
4. Real-Life Experience: Before any medical intervention, patients were required to live as their identified gender for a substantial period, often one to two years. This "real-life test" was intended to ensure that the desire for transition was genuine and sustainable.
5. Medical Criteria: Physical interventions, such as hormone therapy and surgery, were considered only after psychological evaluations and real-life experience. These treatments were seen as a last resort after all other options had been exhausted.
Bring back both common sense, and safer transition.
22
The Issue
From personal experience as a transsexual, I have witnessed the evolution of transition procedures over the last five to six years. With the advent of Self ID, it has become significantly easier to transition, to the point of trivializing the authentic struggles of individuals living with gender dysphoria. With this ease has come an increase in individuals identifying as Non-Binary or other genders that don't even mean anything, which further dilutes the severe reality of gender dysphoria, making it appear mundane by comparison. Their transition just involved growing their hair out and removing their breasts, rather pointlessly, and lumped in as 'trans' when it doesn't mean anything in relation to it, not even close. The detrimental impacts stemming from less stringent criterias involved in hormonal and surgerical transitions have been known to cause a surge in cases of detransition, most of which occur after surgical procedures, leaving individuals physically and emotionally marred.
Prior to the advent of Self ID, stringent diagnostic criteria existed for gender dysphoria. It required a careful evaluation by trained professionals who deeply understood the psychological and physical reality of those genuinely struggling with their identity. This practice ensured that those opting for hormone therapies or surgeries had a clearer understanding and fuller commitment to transition, significantly reducing subsequent health repercussions and detransitions.
By mandating a gender dysphoria diagnosis for cross-sex hormones and surgeries, we can protect individuals from hasty decisions that may later result in regret or health issues. We can also preserve the integrity and respect of those wrestling with genuine gender dysphoria, without trivializing their journey with easier transition procedures. It is not about restricting rights but about ensuring the careful, dutiful, and informed decision-making process.
Please sign this petition to urge the medical community to return to the stringent diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria and ensure that the process of gender transition reveres and respects the severity of this condition. Together, let’s reinforce informed decision-making and protect the authenticity of genuine gender struggles.
It's just not right to make such risks and also be a factor in futhering the struggles of people who do genuinely suffer from the rare disorder that makes them feel like they were genuinely born in the wrong body, and also makes them feel why this is the way they can deal with it. We also do not want children going through all this, as it has fed the idea that we groom children into making hasty decisions at such a young age. Let it be soley an adult thing as well.
The old critera worked fine, and also had a safer and more fulfilling results and doctors also knew when to turn a patient away, and if they should desist, this is the criteria made by Dr John Randall:
1. Persistent Cross-Gender Identification: Patients had to demonstrate a consistent and insistent identification with the opposite gender over a prolonged period. This was not a transient or recent desire but a deeply ingrained aspect of their identity.
2. Significant Distress: The distress caused by the mismatch between assigned gender and gender identity had to be significant, impacting social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. This distress was known as gender dysphoria.
3. Psychological Evaluation: Extensive psychological evaluations were conducted to rule out other mental health conditions that could explain the desire for gender transition. This involved long-term therapy and assessments by multiple professionals.
4. Real-Life Experience: Before any medical intervention, patients were required to live as their identified gender for a substantial period, often one to two years. This "real-life test" was intended to ensure that the desire for transition was genuine and sustainable.
5. Medical Criteria: Physical interventions, such as hormone therapy and surgery, were considered only after psychological evaluations and real-life experience. These treatments were seen as a last resort after all other options had been exhausted.
Bring back both common sense, and safer transition.
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 30 June 2024