The Monash Law Faculty is considering eliminating tutorials, a vital practical learning mechanism for many students. This decision seems to lack substantial premise and is justified only by the introduction of seminars as a sort of replacement mechanism. However, we know that seminars differ significantly from tutorials both in their format and effectiveness. While tutorials involve smaller groups and interactive, example-based teaching methods, seminars typically host over 70 students, making the same level of interaction and personalized learning nearly impossible.

As a student, I can attest to the critical role that tutorials play in reinforcing the knowledge obtained during lectures. They allow for the application of theory through practice, provide opportunities for one-on-one interactions with instructors, and cater specifically to those who learn best through examples and discussions. I have heard many students say that their preferred form of learning is through tutorials. 

The discontinuing of tutorials does not mean seminars can therefore replace the mechanisms behind tutorials through 'interactiveness' as has been proposed, especially when seminars are already meant to be "interactive"; so what change is really being made, besides a downgrade of our education? 

Monash's proposal to replace tutorials with large seminars jeopardizes the quality of education in the law faculty. Law is inherently a complex subject that benefits greatly from detailed discussions and practical applications, which the current tutorial model supports. Removing this model in favor of seminars will likely compromise the depth of understanding and quality of education that Monash has long upheld. T

The decision to remove tutorials appears to have been made without adequate consultation with those most affected — the students. Seminars, with their large group settings, cannot replicate the highly valued aspects of tutorials: personalized feedback, tailored guidance, and an environment conducive to deep question-and-answer sessions.

We urge the Monash Law Faculty to reconsider this decision. By keeping tutorials, Monash will continue to foster a conducive learning environment where students can thrive, engage truly with the content, and develop the skills necessary for their future legal careers.

Sign this petition to support the retention of tutorials and uphold the educational standards Monash is known for. Together, we can advocate for a learning structure that benefits all students and continues to promote academic excellence within the Monash Law Faculty.