Petitioning HE Governor of Haryana and 12 others

Soha Ali Khan be booked in Nawab Pataudi hunting case - Naresh Kadian


Kindly refer to the FIR No. 191 dated 5-6-2005 lodged with the Jhajjar Sadar Police Station for the violation of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 read with the Indian Arms Act against Mansur Ali Khan urf Nawab Pataudi and his team. The District Magistrate, Gurgaon vide his order dated May 8, 2008 canceled the Soha Ali Khan arms license, where as Soha Ali Khan Rifle 91501 was a weapon used in crime, seized by the Jhajjar Police on the same day but Soha Ali Khan concealed this facts, never intimated to the Gurgaon District administration. In fact she was not entitled for arms license at initial stage but she misrepresent her case and got arms license after cheating / misrepresenting local administration with criminal conspiracy, her arms license was regularly renewed by the concerned authorities. As per information Rifle No. 91501 was belongs to Soha Ali Khan aunt Saleha Sultan then illegally transferred to Saif Ali Khan and at last Soha Ali Khan, who was bearing illegal arms license which was canceled by the District Magistrate, Gurgaon.
Kindly refer to the said FIR along with the reply of the Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon under Right to Information Act, 2005 vide letter No. 58 dated 26-2-2008 about the details of Arms license No. 1/DM/G/November/1996 issued on 5-11-1996.
1. I here by confirmed that NPB Rifle No. 91501 of .22 bore taken by the Jhajjar Police in FIR No. 191 dated 5-6-2005.
2. The said arms license was issued on 5-11-1996 where as the date of birth of Ms. Soha Ali Khan is 4-10-1978 & she applied for arms license as minor.
3. When a crime was committed with the said rifle before then how it was renewed up to 4-11-2008 on 24-10-2005, facts concealed by the Ms. Soha Ali Khan while giving application for renewal on dated 7-9-2005 & the same facts was concealed by the Police in their reports along with the witnesses & this is the offense under the law of the land.
4. Ms. Soha Ali Khan sold her illegal gun & the same was deleted from the illegal arms license then how purchase period allowed up to 10-3-2006 ?. It would be pertinent to mention here that as per DM order dated 7-1-2000 Sh. M.M.A Khan was appointed as Retainer & the gun was sold on 2-4-2003 vide DM order No. 4655 dated 10 / 3 then how Nawab Pataudi was carrying the said Rifle No.91501 which belongs to Soha Ali Khan & there was no DM order as retainer after 2000 in favour of Nawab Pataudi - it means illegal possession of other arms & mishandling of the arms & negligence by the said illegal arms license holder Soha Ali Khan, which is canceled by the administration.
5. The Jhajjar Police recovered the arms license of Nawab Pataudi No. 113 /BPL/ 70 dated 3-11-70, valid up to 31-12-2007 but no arms recovered belongs to Nawab Pataudi, this license might be issued & renewed after 31-12-2007 by the District Administration.
6. Ms. Soha Ali Khan was the main accused being an weapon - Rifle so called owner in FIR No. 191 dated 5-6-2005 lodged with Jhajjar Sadar Police Station but how she was spared and no action has been taken against her u/s 420, 120-B of Indian Panel Code read with the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and Indian Arms Act.
7. Rifle No. 91501 was routed through Saif Ali Khan, where as this weapon was belonged to her Aunt Ms. Sultan and this transaction from Bhopal to Soha Ali Khan be inquired.
I demands the independent inquiry about the transfer of the Rifle 91501 which is case property in Nawab Pataudi hunting case. I can smell the conspiracy along with the violations of the law of the land in the transfer of the arms from Saleha Sultan of Bhopal to Soha Ali Khan via Saif Ali Khan. There may be a chance for double standard applied at the level of the District administration, hence FIR may kindly be lodged against all offenders including Soha Ali Khan for the violations of the relevant laws of the land.

Letter to
HE Governor of Haryana
Chief Secretary
Deputy Commissioner of Gurgaon
and 10 others
CWLW of Haryana
Speaker of Haryana Assembly
SHO, Jhajjar
Inspector General, MoEF
Wildlife Crime Control Bureau
Cabinet Secretary to Govt. of India
HE Vice President of India
HE President of India
Director General of Haryana Police
Commissioner of Police
DRGPO/E/2011/00105 On 15-09-2011 for DGP, Haryana and DCGRG/E/2011/00072 On 15-09-2011 for DC, Gurgaon, where as complaint bearing No. 167 dated March 19, 2008 already lodged with the SHO, Pataudi.
People for Animals (PFA) chairperson Maneka Gandhi has expressed concern over the negligent attitude of Gurgaon police after they gave a clean chit to the Pataudi family in the 2006 Black Buck shooting case. The animal welfare group is also planning to move court against the city police in the case. "They are accused and should be behind bars for killing a rare species protected under the Wildlife Act. They also procured a gun licence for a person under the age of 21," said Gandhi after she was apprised about Gurgaon police's refusal to book Soha Ali Khan, the daughter of Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi.
"First, the gun belonged to a girl who was only 18 years old then while the legal age for procuring a gun licence is 21. Second, the gun was used by her father to kill a Black Buck, not by her," Gandhi said.
She expressed concern over the fact that though these acts invite criminal proceedings, Gurgaon police have taken no action.
The PFA chairperson severely criticised the city police for shifting responsibility to the Jhajjar police. "The police do not want to take action against high-profile people who committed a crime in broad daylight. The Gurgaon police claimed to have cancelled Soha Ali Khan's gun licence but it refused to comment on why no criminal case was lodged against them. They said the matter concerns Jhajjar police where the incident had taken place," the animal rights activist added.
Kindly refer to the FIR No. 191 dated 5-6-2005 lodged with the Jhajjar Sadar Police Station for the violation of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 read with the Indian Arms Act against Mansur Ali Khan urf Nawab Pataudi and his team. The District Magistrate, Gurgaon vide his order dated May 8, 2008 canceled the Soha Ali Khan arms license, where as Soha Ali Khan Rifle 91501 was a weapon used in crime, seized by the Jhajjar Police on the same day but Soha Ali Khan concealed this facts, never intimated to the Gurgaon District administration. In fact she was not entitled for arms license at initial stage but she misrepresent her case and got arms license after cheating / misrepresenting local administration with criminal conspiracy, her arms license was regularly renewed by the concerned authorities. As per information Rifle No. 91501 was belongs to Soha Ali Khan aunt Saleha Sultan then illegally transferred to Saif Ali Khan and at last Soha Ali Khan, who was bearing illegal arms license which was canceled by the District Magistrate, Gurgaon.
Kindly refer to the said FIR along with the reply of the Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon under Right to Information Act, 2005 vide letter No. 58 dated 26-2-2008 about the details of Arms license No. 1/DM/G/November/1996 issued on 5-11-1996.
I here by confirmed that NPB Rifle No. 91501 of .22 bore taken by the Jhajjar Police in FIR No. 191 dated 5-6-2005.
The said arms license was issued on 5-11-1996 where as the date of birth of Ms. Soha Ali Khan is 4-10-1978 & she applied for arms license as minor.
When a crime was committed with the said rifle before then how it was renewed up to 4-11-2008 on 24-10-2005, facts concealed by the Ms. Soha Ali Khan while giving application for renewal on dated 7-9-2005 & the same facts was concealed by the Police in their reports along with the witnesses & this is the offense under the law of the land.
Ms. Soha Ali Khan sold her illegal gun & the same was deleted from the illegal arms license then how purchase period allowed up to 10-3-2006 ?. It would be pertinent to mention here that as per DM order dated 7-1-2000 Sh. M.M.A Khan was appointed as Retainer & the gun was sold on 2-4-2003 vide DM order No. 4655 dated 10 / 3 then how Nawab Pataudi was carrying the said Rifle No.91501 which belongs to Soha Ali Khan & there was no DM order as retainer after 2000 in favour of Nawab Pataudi - it means illegal possession of other arms & mishandling of the arms & negligence by the said illegal arms license holder Soha Ali Khan, which is canceled by the administration.
The Jhajjar Police recovered the arms license of Nawab Pataudi No. 113 /BPL/ 70 dated 3-11-70, valid up to 31-12-2007 but no arms recovered belongs to Nawab Pataudi, this license might be issued & renewed after 31-12-2007 by the District Administration.
Ms. Soha Ali Khan was the main accused being an weapon - Rifle so called owner in FIR No. 191 dated 5-6-2005 lodged with Jhajjar Sadar Police Station but how she was spared and no action has been taken against her u/s 420, 120-B of Indian Panel Code read with the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and Indian Arms Act.
Rifle No. 91501 was routed through Saif Ali Khan, where as this weapon was belonged to her Aunt Ms. Sultan and this transaction from Bhopal to Soha Ali Khan be inquired.
I demands the independent inquiry about the transfer of the Rifle 91501 which is case property in Nawab Pataudi hunting case. I can smell the conspiracy along with the violations of the law of the land in the transfer of the arms from Saleha Sultan of Bhopal to Soha Ali Khan via Saif Ali Khan. There may be a chance for double standard applied at the level of the District administration, hence FIR may kindly be lodged against all offenders including Soha and Saif Ali Khan for the violations of the relevant laws of the land, where as Nawab Pataudi's Padam Shri award, which was given in 1967 be recalled.
We support and endorsed all above points raised by Naresh Kadyan.
The concerned District Magistrate has the authority to renew the licence. Therefore, the petition has been forwarded to Secretary, Home Department, GNCT of Delhi vide this Ministry's letter No.V-11026/47/2013-Arms dated 24.07.2013 for appropriate action..