In 2008, Massachusetts passed the Green Communities Act, an energy reform bill, which promotes communities for building greener buildings and energy use with access to grants.  

There's just a few unanswered questions....

1.  How can the materials of building or lot construction which step foot on a wetland be considered green?

2.  How can a building or lot, replacing pristine woods with a green building be considered green?

3.  How can a building location, which creates a large amount of traffic to a poor access area be considered green in the efforts of reducing pollution and energy waste by transportation?

4.  How can a building be green, if the products for consumption or items within it are toxic?

How can all this help reduce Global Warming, the main energy concern by which this Act has been created?

Please ask the State Elected Officials to amend the following definitions into the Act, to make it a better Green Community.

These questions came about from opposition of this project:  http://www.change.org/petitions/view/save_woods_of_salem