Give Americans a "No Confidence" Vote - Citizen Triggered Confidence Review

Recent signers:
Dr. Kathryn Taketa-Wong and 13 others have signed recently.

The Issue

What this is: 
A neutral, rules-first way for the public to withdraw trust between elections and force real follow-through on a clock.

The goal:
Give Americans a lawful tool to say trust is broken and to trigger receipts, hearings, and recorded votes that bite. Not a scolding. A mechanism.

The current government shutdown and its effects on American Citizens and their families highlights the dysfunctional, often corrupt actions of our elected public officials. Our so-called "checks and balances" system is failing its fundamental role — to maintain balance and hold public officials accountable. 

This alarming situation highlights an urgent need for a mechanism to enable citizens to express "no confidence" in our elected officials. Such a mechanism would empower the American people to remove incompetent or corrupt individuals from positions of power by popular vote. This is not merely a matter of opinion; it is about preserving the integrity of our democracy. Statistics show that trust in government has plummeted, with only 20% of Americans saying they trust the federal government 'always or most of the time,' according to a Pew Research Center study. This erosion of trust highlights the need for stronger accountability measures.

Implementing a "no confidence" vote system would provide a vital opportunity for Americans to directly hold their leaders accountable between standard election cycles. Countries like the United Kingdom and Canada have similar systems in place, which have been shown to increase governmental accountability and responsiveness.

By signing this petition, we urge the government to create legislation that will allow the American public to vote "no confidence" on elected officials when they demonstrate inadequate governance and ethical violations. It's time to stand up for our rights as citizens and demand greater accountability from those in power. Please join us in advocating for a stronger, more responsible government by signing this petition today.

How it works

Create a verified petition threshold for action(for example 1 to 2 percent within 30 days). A minority of legislators or an Inspector General finding can also trigger it.
Public hearings within 30 to 45 days with subpoena power.
A public report that scores each allegation as substantiated, unsubstantiated, or unresolved.
A binding floor vote to adopt the report and select remedies.
Remedies
Censure plus a corrective plan with deadlines. Loss of leadership posts until compliance is verified. Referrals to prosecutors or ethics bodies. Where state law allows, recall or special leadership elections. For Congress, chamber rules can make oversight votes automatic.

Guardrails
Verified signatures with one person one signature. Cooling-off period before repeats on the same facts. Penalties for fraud. Due process with counsel. Judicial fast-track for disputes.

Sunlight engine
Real-time public calendars and lobbying contacts within 24 hours. Campaign finance updates within 48 hours during active sessions. Open API for all disclosures. Strong whistleblower protections.

Paths to adoption
States with initiatives can pass it by statute. States without initiatives can petition legislatures and require a hearing within 60 days. Congress can adopt it in chamber rules and by statute for oversight. Article V is optional.

Call to build the dam
Power should live with the people between elections too. This mechanism gives every American a clean lever to withdraw confidence and force a remedy on a clock. No flags. No slogans. Just receipts, hearings, and recorded votes.

19

Recent signers:
Dr. Kathryn Taketa-Wong and 13 others have signed recently.

The Issue

What this is: 
A neutral, rules-first way for the public to withdraw trust between elections and force real follow-through on a clock.

The goal:
Give Americans a lawful tool to say trust is broken and to trigger receipts, hearings, and recorded votes that bite. Not a scolding. A mechanism.

The current government shutdown and its effects on American Citizens and their families highlights the dysfunctional, often corrupt actions of our elected public officials. Our so-called "checks and balances" system is failing its fundamental role — to maintain balance and hold public officials accountable. 

This alarming situation highlights an urgent need for a mechanism to enable citizens to express "no confidence" in our elected officials. Such a mechanism would empower the American people to remove incompetent or corrupt individuals from positions of power by popular vote. This is not merely a matter of opinion; it is about preserving the integrity of our democracy. Statistics show that trust in government has plummeted, with only 20% of Americans saying they trust the federal government 'always or most of the time,' according to a Pew Research Center study. This erosion of trust highlights the need for stronger accountability measures.

Implementing a "no confidence" vote system would provide a vital opportunity for Americans to directly hold their leaders accountable between standard election cycles. Countries like the United Kingdom and Canada have similar systems in place, which have been shown to increase governmental accountability and responsiveness.

By signing this petition, we urge the government to create legislation that will allow the American public to vote "no confidence" on elected officials when they demonstrate inadequate governance and ethical violations. It's time to stand up for our rights as citizens and demand greater accountability from those in power. Please join us in advocating for a stronger, more responsible government by signing this petition today.

How it works

Create a verified petition threshold for action(for example 1 to 2 percent within 30 days). A minority of legislators or an Inspector General finding can also trigger it.
Public hearings within 30 to 45 days with subpoena power.
A public report that scores each allegation as substantiated, unsubstantiated, or unresolved.
A binding floor vote to adopt the report and select remedies.
Remedies
Censure plus a corrective plan with deadlines. Loss of leadership posts until compliance is verified. Referrals to prosecutors or ethics bodies. Where state law allows, recall or special leadership elections. For Congress, chamber rules can make oversight votes automatic.

Guardrails
Verified signatures with one person one signature. Cooling-off period before repeats on the same facts. Penalties for fraud. Due process with counsel. Judicial fast-track for disputes.

Sunlight engine
Real-time public calendars and lobbying contacts within 24 hours. Campaign finance updates within 48 hours during active sessions. Open API for all disclosures. Strong whistleblower protections.

Paths to adoption
States with initiatives can pass it by statute. States without initiatives can petition legislatures and require a hearing within 60 days. Congress can adopt it in chamber rules and by statute for oversight. Article V is optional.

Call to build the dam
Power should live with the people between elections too. This mechanism gives every American a clean lever to withdraw confidence and force a remedy on a clock. No flags. No slogans. Just receipts, hearings, and recorded votes.

The Decision Makers

Regina Romero
Tucson City Mayor
Katie Hobbs
Arizona Governor
Adelita Grijalva
Former Pima County Supervisor Board - District 5
Mark Kelly
U.S. Senate - Arizona
Juan Ciscomani
U.S. House of Representatives - Arizona 6th Congressional District

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates