Family Law Act of 1975 - no fault divorce, they can do anything to you, the truth is completely irrelevant.  Just divide up the assets. 

Legislation, the law NEVER make A Wrong- RIGHT 😡

By modernizing the Family Law Act, we will have a judicial system that is fair, just, consistent, where justice is finally provided.

The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing 

FAMILY LAW ACT REFORMS

New Family Law Act Legislation must include the following details

1. 'Without fault' must be updated to 'irreconcilable differences' from the Family Law Act
2. Legislation must state Mandatory Consistent standard rules for all parties to comply with. Non-compliance by one party is not tolerated
3. Legislation must include Mandatory Financial Disclosure by both parties with all details uploaded onto the Family Court website
4. False Claims - legislation must include contempt of court and reduction of settlement
5. Legislation must cover Embezzlement, this must always be included in the settlement details
6. Criminal violence - attempted murder must be covered by the Family Law Legislation
7. Paperwork must be lodged to Family Court Website.  Reviewed by legally trained staff, no need for endless court appearances for paperwork
8. Legislation ensure Judges read evidence provided, before they agree to exclude the truth
9. What you had before the marriage is yours and is not part of the property settlement
10. Only what you have achieved together is to be considered in the property settlement

Family Estate Law Reform

1. Legislation to protect children/adults of previous/first marriage are entitled to share of estate.  Everything does not go to new spouse and children.
2. Legislation recognises Fulltime Unpaid Carers in Family Estate Law - for all their endless sacrifices taking care of a loved one 24/7/365.   Ensure they receive a fair/ bigger share of the estate, regardless of the will.  Full time unpaid carers are saving Australia $70 billion pa for all our selfless care of loved ones. 

SUPREME COURT ASSESSMENTS LEGISLATION REFORMS

1. Legislation Mandatory another reviews decision to ensure all evidence has been read and considered.  Ensure accountability.
2. Legislation must include consideration to individual circumstances including health and not being a lawyer.   
3. Legislation If appealed, due to Supreme Court Costs Assessments catastrophic error, Appeal must take priority over other assessments to meet court deadlines. Should NOT have to pay for appeal, only to lodge the papers.

ASIC LEGISLATION REFORMS

1. ASIC’s due diligence responsibility for all new business registrations, names of businesses and addresses are not almost identical and with the same address.
2. If ASIC allow registered almost identical business name, must advise original business owner, can dispute their almost identical business name and ensure is corrected immediately.

This case highlights a broader issue within the Family Law Act that is not only outdated but grossly inadequate in handling cases of abuse and protecting victims' rights. Between 2012 and 2016, a man had $750,000 embezzled from his business by his South African wife. He stopped her access to his bank accounts Sept 2016. She demanded access to his bank accounts, when he refused May 13, 2017, she escalated the violence by stabbing him and leaving him to die. He courageously called the police with the knife still inside of him, the subsequent criminal proceedings were fraught with injustice. She claimed he was violent, had no money, living in her car. Shockingly, he was never able to provide a victim statement nor was he informed of his victims' rights. Furthermore, the police prosecutor remained silent during the proceedings, undermining any chance for justice.

She received a Criminal Conviction with 16 months ankle bracelet and community service. Had he stabbed her, he would have gone to prison from day.

Family Court orders forgot to include her AVO. This would never happen to a female DV survivor. She breached her AVO, tried to access his home.  Police were called - did NOTHING.

She should be in prison for the rest of her days for premediated attempted murder. 

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4502032/Male-60-stabbed-suspected-Sydney-s-inner-west.html

I am a domestic violence survivor - my ex tried to kill me 3 times. A domestic violence survivor NEVER seeks revenge. We just never want to see them ever again.  I am not a lawyer. 

When she did not succeed in murdering him, when she stabbed him. Typical evil narcissist playing the victim claiming he was violent, had no money, living in her car.  She was determined to put him in his grave by manipulating both his Sailing Club and Strata Committee. Both became involved with both the Criminal and Family Court proceedings. No one asked for his side of the story. Had I not taken on all his unjust fraudulent battles coming in every direction all at once he would be dead.  He survived cancer twice.

Irrelevant in the Family Court she stabbed him and left him to die. Irrelevant she embezzled $750k in 5 years of marriage.

Irrelevant she manipulated both his Strata Committee and Sailing Club who both did many illegal things against him to put him in his grave causing him horrific misery. Irrelevant she stole most his clients and set up an identical business whilst claiming she had no money. Irrelevant she is both a Tax and Centrelink fraudster with her 4 names.  

His third lawyers, tried to blackmail him.  We were not going to a fourth lawyer. 

Prepared 5 folder of evidence, his third solicitors refused to provide to the Family Court.  Her lawyers met with the judge and objected to it all entirely. Judge never read anything.  I was provided with 5 days to prepare the entire case, only permitted to email 20 pages.  I prepared another 330 pages of all new evidence, hand delivered to the court and her solicitor met the court deadline.  Instead of serving her deserved punishment, the perpetrator benefited from a biased system.  Truth and facts are irrelevant under the Family Law Act of 1975.   Just divide assets 

Family Court ordered he pay her over $500K.  This is NOT JUSTICE - it's JUST US

His third lawyer claimed twice to the Supreme Court Costs Assessments 2020 + 2021 they had not been paid.  I provided the bank statements of payments into his lawyers trust account, which were NEVER read.  He was Court ordered to pay his third lawyer another $104K. The Family Court Judge was retiring July 2021.   I appealed with the truth and all the evidence of their many catastrophic mistakes. The legal fraternity worked together against my appeal with the Supreme Court Costs Assessments and refused to meet the deadline of the Family Court settlement date. 

2023 Her Centrelink fraud was reported since 2016 with her 4 names, bank and credit card statements, typical public servants, experts at doing nothing, she walks freely.

Have contacted the media for years, no one will publicize this horrific story.  Have contacted every State and Federal Australian Attorney General last year, including the Prime Minister with the Federal Law reforms we need, all completely ignored. Unless we speak out nothing changes.

Please Sign the petition now to urge the Australian government to prioritize and enact major reforms to the Family Law Act of 1975,  Supreme Court Costs Assessments and ASIC, securing a fairer and more just legal framework for all Australians. Many thanks