Demand for justice regarding a Violation of Public Trust and Denial of Due Process

Demand for justice regarding a Violation of Public Trust and Denial of Due Process

Recent signers:
Diamond Treadwell and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

I am a 37-year-old, God-fearing American Man, Husband to an amazing wife and father of 5 beautiful kids, who has found himself entangled in a terrifying quagmire of justice. On October 22nd, 2021, between the hours of 8-9 pm My fully limousine window tinted Automobile except for the windshield, was stopped by Sgt Karl Knowles of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Sgt Knowles made a claim that he stopped me because my license plate Violated Nevada Revised Statute 482.275(4) although the standard set forth by this Statute clearly states “Every license plate must at all times be securely fastened to the vehicle to which it is assigned so as to prevent the plate from swinging and at a height not less than 12 inches from the ground, measuring from the bottom of such plate, in a place and position to be clearly visible, and must be maintained free from foreign materials and in a condition to be clearly legible.” Although my license plate was clearly not in violation of the traffic law, and I had already exited my vehicle, and it was locked as I attempted to enter store located on private property Sgt Knowles then turned on his sirens and chose to unlawfully initiate traffic stop on my vehicle without cause. Upon initiating stop Sgt Knowles then arrested me for an alleged warrant, although I did not have a warrant. After being arrested without cause and although my automobile was locked and located on the private property of the 711 Convenient store, officer Micheal Garrett then asked me for permission to search my vehicle when I denied consent officer Garrett then became furious and more determined to  search my Automobile stating that I must have something illegal in my vehicle because I had chosen to exercise my Constitutionally Guaranteed Fourth Amendment right, I was then held on the scene handcuffed in the back of a police car for additional 45 minutes while police officers gathered and plotted to establish  any valid reason to search my vehicle to no avail, until officer Garrett was exiting 711 convenient store in less than a seconds time while walking pass the windshield made a miraculous claim that through the automobiles windshield he saw a black case with a Springfield armory insignia on the black carpeted floor located in the third row of the completely black decorated interior of my automobile at approximately 10:00pm at night which is a highly impossible claim because when officer Garrett first arrived on the scene he along with his partner did a thorough search of the outside of my vehicle which lasted a couple of minutes and neither officer ever made claim of seeing anything in Plainview that would give probable cause to search my automobile.

 

After officer’s fabricated evidence to get a warrant to search my automobile, police officer’s then obtained an illegitimate warrant to search my automobile at which point a Springfield armory firearm was found, which I was then arrested for and held in jail for 72hours until I went to the initial arraignment in the Las Vegas Justice Court, Where I was then released on my own recognizance because the State said that they did not know how to charge me, and by law they could not hold for longer than 72hours without charging with a crime. After being released I went to court every month for a year, every time being informed that the state had still not charged me. Finally after learning that case was fraudulent and that a false power of attorney was used to make me a surety and liable for the charges I reached a point of frustration, I then filed a motion to Dismiss on the basis of jurisdiction, and by use of an Executors letter, I demanded that the state provide to me a copy of all bonding, power of attorney’s , and any and all other financial documents relating to case 21cr049100 as well as a demand for the oaths of office, insurances and bonding of all public officials involved in the case. Instead of providing me with the request of my demand, the District Attorney Steven, Wolfson along with Deputy District Attorney Madilyn Cole then dismissed the case in the Justice Court and in violation of my Constitutionally guaranteed Fifth and Fourteenth amendments right to due process, convened a Grand jury indictment without giving me notice and the opportunity to testify on my own behalf before that Grand jury.   

 

After being only informed that case C-23-376146-1 had been initiated, until August 10th, 2023, when state appointed Public Defender Jason Makris, called and informed me that there was a an initial arraignment hearing scheduled on August 11th, 2023 at which I filed a motion to show cause, counter claim, countersign, and countermand as well as a motion to claim ineffective counsel. All of these documents were vacated by judge Ronald Israel and called fugitive documents. After being forced to in to court under duress and the threat of warrant, another initial arraignment hearing was scheduled on August 30th, 2023 entered a plea of not guilty on my  behalf  where Public Defender Jason Makris withdrew as counsel at which point I informed the Judge that I would be Representing myself throughout the case he then scheduled a Farretta Canvas (which is a mental evaluation to determine if a person is competent and capable of self-representation) upon successfully completing Farretta Canvas  the judge agreed that I was Competent and Capable enough to represent myself  Which lasted Until October 30th, 2024, when judge Ronald Israel revoked my right to self-representation  because District Attorney-Steven Wolfson and Deputy District Attorney-Madilyn Cole  made claim through Motion to Revoke Defendants Right to Self-Representation and Appoint Counsel. because I was hindering the District attorney and the Eighth Judicial District Court’s ability to prosecute due to me filing the following documents into court: (Request for an Evidentiary Hearing, Notice of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, Demand for Abatement, Notice and Demand for a Bill of particulars, Request for Original Unaltered Transcripts, Motion to Show Cause, Counterclaim, Countermand, and Countersign, Motion to Request Oaths of Office, Motion for Discovery, Conditional Acceptance, and Motion to Dismiss, as well as Bonding for all Public Officials Involved.) Although all of these Documents were ignored by Madilyn Cole and Steven Wolfson or denied by Ronald Israel The Motion to Revoke my Self Representation and Appoint Counsel was granted. After being Stripped of my Constitutional right to self-representation, In an attempt to have unjust evidence suppressed Appointed counsel Rachael Stewart filed a Motion to Reconsider Suppression of Evidence  on December 23rd, 2024  which showed proof by way of officer worn body Camera that police conspired against me to illegally obtain warrant, and that my license plate was not in violation of N.R.S 482.275 which, frustratingly, was denied by Ronald Israel on the basis of Eighth Judicial District Court Rule making claim that no substantial Circumstance had occurred in the case that would warrant a reconsideration of his prior ruling his decision to was a violation of 42 U.S.C 1983 (which is Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law) after the judges Ruling, based on the standard of the Nevada Supreme Court Madilyn Cole and Steven Wolfson had a 30day timeframe to submit an order supporting Ronald Israel ruling. Today is February 22nd, 2025. It has been 60 days since hearing and no order has been submitted, and furthermore when I demanded that Appointed-Counsel Racheal Stewart to Compel State to enter order which is a necessity to appeal the judge’s ruling, she refused and instead filed a motion to withdraw as counsel which is scheduled for February 26th,2025.  Amid all this, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution Madilyn Cole, Steven Wolfson, and Ronald Israel have refused me the right to inspect the evidence used to obtain probable cause stating that they don’t have it in their possession. Despite this glaring omission, they insist on proceeding with the case. 

 

The criminal complaint in question case# C-23-376146-1 in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada is in clear violation of the United States Constitution on the basis that the Court and all actors involved are operating under a statutory Jurisdiction when the Constitution only allows for a Common Law which would require living man or woman acting as a complaining witness or Admiralty Jurisdiction and furthermore there are no published rules of Criminal Procedure for a statutory Jurisdiction in the United States Constitution. This case reeks of constitutional violations and begs for a thorough review for deprivation of rights under color of law, Public Corruption, Treason and fraud.

A rigorous judicial review can bring the truth to light. It can reveal whether our rights and liberties have been trampled upon and if corruption is corroding the fabric of our judicial systems. This isn't just about a single case; this is about the integrity of justice. The constitution is the very scaffold that supports justice, and any cracks in it must not be ignored. 

Let us invoke the power of public appeal to seek truth and justice. Let us demand a judicial review of case C-23-376146-1 by the Nevada Supreme Court, United States Attorney General or the Office of Inspector General or the Department of Justice for the perceived constitutional violations, fraud, and treason to the American people. It's an appeal for transparency, an appeal for justice, and an appeal not just for me, but for any individual who may stand in my place in the future.

If the Eighth Judicial District Court and Clark County District Attorney’s office are allowed to continue with this case without a higher authority intervening to ensure justice, they are seeking to give me a minimum of 5years in jail, this would cause a tremendous pain and suffering to my wife and 5 kids who would be left to fend for themselves without me. a trial date is currently set for April 7th, 2025, Please Sign this petition to help demand an injunction pending a Judicial Review for my case and ensure that justice is served impartially and correctly. Together, we can turn the tide and demand judicial transparency and integrity right here in Nevada.

 

Thankyou for taking your time and consideration regarding my petition.

 

249

Recent signers:
Diamond Treadwell and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

I am a 37-year-old, God-fearing American Man, Husband to an amazing wife and father of 5 beautiful kids, who has found himself entangled in a terrifying quagmire of justice. On October 22nd, 2021, between the hours of 8-9 pm My fully limousine window tinted Automobile except for the windshield, was stopped by Sgt Karl Knowles of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Sgt Knowles made a claim that he stopped me because my license plate Violated Nevada Revised Statute 482.275(4) although the standard set forth by this Statute clearly states “Every license plate must at all times be securely fastened to the vehicle to which it is assigned so as to prevent the plate from swinging and at a height not less than 12 inches from the ground, measuring from the bottom of such plate, in a place and position to be clearly visible, and must be maintained free from foreign materials and in a condition to be clearly legible.” Although my license plate was clearly not in violation of the traffic law, and I had already exited my vehicle, and it was locked as I attempted to enter store located on private property Sgt Knowles then turned on his sirens and chose to unlawfully initiate traffic stop on my vehicle without cause. Upon initiating stop Sgt Knowles then arrested me for an alleged warrant, although I did not have a warrant. After being arrested without cause and although my automobile was locked and located on the private property of the 711 Convenient store, officer Micheal Garrett then asked me for permission to search my vehicle when I denied consent officer Garrett then became furious and more determined to  search my Automobile stating that I must have something illegal in my vehicle because I had chosen to exercise my Constitutionally Guaranteed Fourth Amendment right, I was then held on the scene handcuffed in the back of a police car for additional 45 minutes while police officers gathered and plotted to establish  any valid reason to search my vehicle to no avail, until officer Garrett was exiting 711 convenient store in less than a seconds time while walking pass the windshield made a miraculous claim that through the automobiles windshield he saw a black case with a Springfield armory insignia on the black carpeted floor located in the third row of the completely black decorated interior of my automobile at approximately 10:00pm at night which is a highly impossible claim because when officer Garrett first arrived on the scene he along with his partner did a thorough search of the outside of my vehicle which lasted a couple of minutes and neither officer ever made claim of seeing anything in Plainview that would give probable cause to search my automobile.

 

After officer’s fabricated evidence to get a warrant to search my automobile, police officer’s then obtained an illegitimate warrant to search my automobile at which point a Springfield armory firearm was found, which I was then arrested for and held in jail for 72hours until I went to the initial arraignment in the Las Vegas Justice Court, Where I was then released on my own recognizance because the State said that they did not know how to charge me, and by law they could not hold for longer than 72hours without charging with a crime. After being released I went to court every month for a year, every time being informed that the state had still not charged me. Finally after learning that case was fraudulent and that a false power of attorney was used to make me a surety and liable for the charges I reached a point of frustration, I then filed a motion to Dismiss on the basis of jurisdiction, and by use of an Executors letter, I demanded that the state provide to me a copy of all bonding, power of attorney’s , and any and all other financial documents relating to case 21cr049100 as well as a demand for the oaths of office, insurances and bonding of all public officials involved in the case. Instead of providing me with the request of my demand, the District Attorney Steven, Wolfson along with Deputy District Attorney Madilyn Cole then dismissed the case in the Justice Court and in violation of my Constitutionally guaranteed Fifth and Fourteenth amendments right to due process, convened a Grand jury indictment without giving me notice and the opportunity to testify on my own behalf before that Grand jury.   

 

After being only informed that case C-23-376146-1 had been initiated, until August 10th, 2023, when state appointed Public Defender Jason Makris, called and informed me that there was a an initial arraignment hearing scheduled on August 11th, 2023 at which I filed a motion to show cause, counter claim, countersign, and countermand as well as a motion to claim ineffective counsel. All of these documents were vacated by judge Ronald Israel and called fugitive documents. After being forced to in to court under duress and the threat of warrant, another initial arraignment hearing was scheduled on August 30th, 2023 entered a plea of not guilty on my  behalf  where Public Defender Jason Makris withdrew as counsel at which point I informed the Judge that I would be Representing myself throughout the case he then scheduled a Farretta Canvas (which is a mental evaluation to determine if a person is competent and capable of self-representation) upon successfully completing Farretta Canvas  the judge agreed that I was Competent and Capable enough to represent myself  Which lasted Until October 30th, 2024, when judge Ronald Israel revoked my right to self-representation  because District Attorney-Steven Wolfson and Deputy District Attorney-Madilyn Cole  made claim through Motion to Revoke Defendants Right to Self-Representation and Appoint Counsel. because I was hindering the District attorney and the Eighth Judicial District Court’s ability to prosecute due to me filing the following documents into court: (Request for an Evidentiary Hearing, Notice of Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, Demand for Abatement, Notice and Demand for a Bill of particulars, Request for Original Unaltered Transcripts, Motion to Show Cause, Counterclaim, Countermand, and Countersign, Motion to Request Oaths of Office, Motion for Discovery, Conditional Acceptance, and Motion to Dismiss, as well as Bonding for all Public Officials Involved.) Although all of these Documents were ignored by Madilyn Cole and Steven Wolfson or denied by Ronald Israel The Motion to Revoke my Self Representation and Appoint Counsel was granted. After being Stripped of my Constitutional right to self-representation, In an attempt to have unjust evidence suppressed Appointed counsel Rachael Stewart filed a Motion to Reconsider Suppression of Evidence  on December 23rd, 2024  which showed proof by way of officer worn body Camera that police conspired against me to illegally obtain warrant, and that my license plate was not in violation of N.R.S 482.275 which, frustratingly, was denied by Ronald Israel on the basis of Eighth Judicial District Court Rule making claim that no substantial Circumstance had occurred in the case that would warrant a reconsideration of his prior ruling his decision to was a violation of 42 U.S.C 1983 (which is Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law) after the judges Ruling, based on the standard of the Nevada Supreme Court Madilyn Cole and Steven Wolfson had a 30day timeframe to submit an order supporting Ronald Israel ruling. Today is February 22nd, 2025. It has been 60 days since hearing and no order has been submitted, and furthermore when I demanded that Appointed-Counsel Racheal Stewart to Compel State to enter order which is a necessity to appeal the judge’s ruling, she refused and instead filed a motion to withdraw as counsel which is scheduled for February 26th,2025.  Amid all this, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution Madilyn Cole, Steven Wolfson, and Ronald Israel have refused me the right to inspect the evidence used to obtain probable cause stating that they don’t have it in their possession. Despite this glaring omission, they insist on proceeding with the case. 

 

The criminal complaint in question case# C-23-376146-1 in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada is in clear violation of the United States Constitution on the basis that the Court and all actors involved are operating under a statutory Jurisdiction when the Constitution only allows for a Common Law which would require living man or woman acting as a complaining witness or Admiralty Jurisdiction and furthermore there are no published rules of Criminal Procedure for a statutory Jurisdiction in the United States Constitution. This case reeks of constitutional violations and begs for a thorough review for deprivation of rights under color of law, Public Corruption, Treason and fraud.

A rigorous judicial review can bring the truth to light. It can reveal whether our rights and liberties have been trampled upon and if corruption is corroding the fabric of our judicial systems. This isn't just about a single case; this is about the integrity of justice. The constitution is the very scaffold that supports justice, and any cracks in it must not be ignored. 

Let us invoke the power of public appeal to seek truth and justice. Let us demand a judicial review of case C-23-376146-1 by the Nevada Supreme Court, United States Attorney General or the Office of Inspector General or the Department of Justice for the perceived constitutional violations, fraud, and treason to the American people. It's an appeal for transparency, an appeal for justice, and an appeal not just for me, but for any individual who may stand in my place in the future.

If the Eighth Judicial District Court and Clark County District Attorney’s office are allowed to continue with this case without a higher authority intervening to ensure justice, they are seeking to give me a minimum of 5years in jail, this would cause a tremendous pain and suffering to my wife and 5 kids who would be left to fend for themselves without me. a trial date is currently set for April 7th, 2025, Please Sign this petition to help demand an injunction pending a Judicial Review for my case and ensure that justice is served impartially and correctly. Together, we can turn the tide and demand judicial transparency and integrity right here in Nevada.

 

Thankyou for taking your time and consideration regarding my petition.

 

Petition Updates