SIGN IN TO REQUEST CANADA TO RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM APPLICANTS, WHERE CANADA HAS FAILED ON THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS AND ABANDONED THEIR SIGNATORY TO THE 1951 GENEVA CONVENTION AND HAS CONSISTENTLY DESIGNED THE TEMPLE OF JUSTICE AS THE CASE MAY BE.

Hello folks, We at Ekens Foundation International, a think tank civil and political rights campaigner, are helping rejected refugees, asylum seekers, and less-privileged detainees globally. accredited member of the United Nations Consultative Status of Economic and Social Affairs Council, Promoting Universal Periodic Reviews on Human Rights and the Mechanisms and Sustainable Development Goal

Our services include compiling a comprehensive report on a human rights situation that requires United Nations Council attention while engaging in various research and publication activities, including Travesty of Justice, Mistrial of Justice, Reprisal Action, and Systematic Oppression.

Please help us sign this petition. We want Canada to stop working with countries of persecution against refugees and asylum claimants; our goal is to reach as many signatures as we can. 

By signing in, you are helping the rejected refugees and asylum seekers in various detentions awaiting deportation, while we are asking Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to stop the deportation of refugees. 

In particular, you are demanding natural justice, especially from the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, to reinstate the applicant refugee convention status, which Canada vacated in violation of the 1951 convention, to the applicant client file number ID 5921-1644 of November 3, 2007. 

Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world,

Recognizing that those rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person, In this regard, the applicant has waited patiently for 14 to 15 years for Canada to respect their obligation in all ramifications of international norms and practices regarding the universal decoration of fundamental human rights, yet Canada continues to fail to fulfill their constitutional obligation.

Considering that Canada has failed on its international obligation as a state under the Charter, in particular Article 55, to promote universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

WHAT IS THE 1951 GENEVA CONVENTION?

The 1951 Refugee Convention is the key legal document that forms the basis of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Ratified by 145 state parties, including Canada, it defines the term refugee' and outlines the rights of the displaced, as well as the legal obligations of states to protect them, which Canada has failed to comply with on the client ID File# 5921-1644, as the case may be.

Article 25 of the Convention, which concerns administrative assistance,
reflects the fact that a refugee cannot rely on the national protection of his or her
country of origin. It is also intended to prevent a refugee from being exposed to persecution through contact with the authorities of his or her country of origin and
to prevent family members and/or associates who still remain in the country of
origin being placed at risk, which Canada has ignored in this particular matter, as the case may be. 

The Act for Protection of Personal Data held by Administrative Organs, which derives from the Personal Data Protection Act, was promulgated in 2003.

The 1985 United Nations Declaration on the Human Rights of Individuals Who Are Not Nationals of the Country in Which They Live, Article 5 (1), Aliens shall enjoy, in accordance with domestic law and subject to the international obligation of the state in which they are present,

In particular, there are the following rights: (b) the right to protection against arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, family, home, or correspondence.

The convention is to secure in the territory of each party for every individual, whatever his nationality or residence, respect for his rights and fundamental freedoms, and in particular his right to privacy, with regard to the automatic processing of personal data relating to him. 

Confidentiality in asylum procedures is particularly important because of the
vulnerable situation in which refugees and asylum-seekers find themselves, as discussed during the Global Consultations on International Protection.

The United Nations Articles affirmed that asylum procedures should at all stages respect the confidentiality of all aspects of an asylum claim, including the fact that the asylum-seeker has made such a request, and highlighted that “no information on the asylum application should be shared with the country of origin. In this particular case, Canada failed to fulfill its convention obligation and showed a lack of respect for the international norms and practices regarding the determination of refugees.

Canada failed to maintain the core principles: The core principle is non-refoulement, which asserts that a refugee should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom. This is now considered a rule of customary international law, which Canada signed and ratified. 

CANADA FAILED TO MAINTAIN THE UNHCR RULES: The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) serves as the ‘guardian’ of the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol. According to the legislation, states are expected to cooperate with us in ensuring that the rights of refugees are respected and protected.

CANADA IS PERSECUTING A REFUGEE APPLICANT CONTRARY TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENT:

In determining the meaning of persecution, it is useful to remember that Section 3(3)(f) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act states that the Act is to be construed and applied in a manner that complies with international human rights instruments to which Canada is a signatory.

(a) Who is the agent of protection in this case? Answer: Canada, (b) Who are the agents of persecution in this case? The answer is the applicant's country of origin and her security agencies. (c) Does Canada have any legal right under the 1951 Geneva Convention to directly communicate with the agents of persecution against refugee claimants? The answer is no.

CANADA FAILED TO PERFECTLY EVALUATE THE 5 GROUNDS OF PERSECUTION FOR ASYLUM APPLICANTS.

In the 5 grounds of refugee and asylum eligibility, the definition of a Convention refugee states that a claimant's fear of persecution must be "by reason of" one of the five enumerated grounds: race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.

WHO IS THE APPLICANT? 

The applicant whose identity is withheld for security reasons is a humanitarian person, philanthropist, volunteer, and social worker who has dedicated his or her life to helping the less privileged and has become the voice of the voiceless and the power of the powerless, deportees and detainees of rejected refugees and asylum seekers.

PETITION NARRATIVE: This petition is about the Canadian authority's treatment of a refugee claimant who arrived in Canada in November 2007, 14 years ago, and sought international protection under the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. The application was made eligible against the applicant's agents of persecution, namely the country of origin, and the refugee application against the persecutory state, namely the applicant's country of origin, that is directly involved in the applicant's refugee plight.

In 2009, after a complete two-day hearing, the Refugee Board of Canada conferred on the applicant convention refugee status, and in the same year, the applicant applied for permanent residency. Canadian authorities have not given the applicant permanent residence to date, after 14 years.

The applicant's refugee status was confirmed in 2009 on the grounds of race, nationality, membership in a particular social group, and political opinion under the Canada Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, ss. 107(1), and Refugee Protection Division Rules, Rule 61.

The applicant has been punished by way of reprisal action and systematic oppression, including dehumanization, by the Canadian authorities for petitioning Canada to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in Geneva. Communication reference with UNHRC G/SO 215/15 CAN (214)-CE/GT/ys 2653/2015 for verification supposes 

Canada applies discrimination, reprisal action, and systematic oppression against the applicant by declaring the applicant inadmissible in Canada for belonging to a particular social and ethnic group, and Canada lost the case.
Canada, in turn, forms an alliance with the applicant as agents of persecution against the applicant.

The Canadian government used the same agents of persecution, namely the persecutory state, as a source of information in the determination of international protection in violation of the International Covenant on Torture, including the 1951 Geneva Conventions, which Canada signed and ratified.

Canada used reprisal action and systematic oppression against the applicant and collaborated with the agents of persecution to strip the applicant of international protection refugee status and leave the applicant without status for 14 years to date.

APPLICANTS HAVE CRIMINAL RECORD:

Applicants have no criminal record, no violation of any kind, but the Canadian government incarcerated the applicant at Quebec provincial jail for a lengthy period of time, showing a lack of the appropriate balance between the law’s and the willingness to observe the natural justice that should have been observed, thereby allowing prejudgment execution practices against the applicant. 

The applicant has petitioned Canada to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in Geneva under the Optional Protocols for Civil and Political Rights.

The United Nations Human Rights Committee in Geneva, under the Optional Protocols for Civil and Political Rights, issued an interim measure against Canada, informing Canada to stay every action under Committee Rules 97. 

The Canadian government violated the Interim Measures Order under Rules 97 of the UNHCR dated October 7, 2019.

The Canadian government has until today challenged the special rapporteur of the United Nations Human Rights Committee in Geneva on the case. 

Canada violated the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, advisory opinions on the rules of confidentiality regarding asylum information. 
Canada violated the United Nations Principles governing the sharing of data on asylum claimants.

UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES, ADVISORY OPINIONS ON THE RULES OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGARDING ASYLUM INFORMATION: International human rights law guarantees everyone the right to privacy and protects individuals from arbitrary or unlawful interference.

In international law, the right to privacy is generally defined as everyone’s right to know whether information concerning him or her is being processed, to obtain it in an intelligible form without undue delay or expense, and to have appropriate rectifications or erasures made in case of unlawful, unnecessary, or inaccurate entries.

Effective measures need to be taken to ensure that information concerning a person’s private life does not reach the hands of third parties that might use such
information for purposes incompatible with international human rights law, Canada violated this international law.

General principles governing confidentiality require that the sharing of
Information from an external party should not jeopardize the safety of the
individual concerned or led to the violation of his or her human rights.

Art. 17 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Canada is a party, states that “no one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful
interference with his privacy, family, home, or correspondence, nor to unlawful
attacks on his honor and reputation.

Canadian legislation, which strictly regulates confidentiality requirements imposed
on administrative institutions.

These principles governing the right to privacy are equally applicable to refugees.
and asylum-seekers, and other aliens, as they are to the nationals.

The right to privacy and its confidentiality requirements are especially important for an asylum-seeker, whose claim inherently implies a fear of persecution by the
authorities of the country of origin and whose situation can be jeopardized if
protection of information is not ensured.

It would be against the spirit of the 1951 Convention to share personal data or any other information relating to asylum seekers with the authorities of the country of origin until a final rejection of the asylum claim.

In this case, Canada was in constant communication with the applicant country of origin and her agents of persecution, thus allowing the country of persecution to participate in a procedural process of international protection in violation of the 1951 Geneva Convention. 

Bearing these concerns in mind, the state that receives and assesses an asylum
request must refrain from sharing any information with the authorities of the
country of origin, and indeed, from informing the authorities in the country of
origin that a national has presented an asylum claim. This applies regardless of
whether the country of origin is considered by the authorities of asylum as a “safe
country of origin”, or whether the asylum claim is considered to be based on
economic motives.  Likewise, the authorities of the country of asylum may not
weigh the risks involved in the sharing of confidential information with the country of
origin, and conclude that it will not result in human rights violations.

Canada violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, including Section 24(1) and Subsection 24(2) of the Charter.

Canada violated Section 8(1) of the Canadian Privacy Act.

Canada is threatening to deport the applicant to face torture at the hands of Canada's allies, who are the agents of persecution that are directly implicated in the applicant's refugee plight.

Canada does not want to respect human rights in this matter, as may be the case. 
Support this petition by signing in to inform Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to restore the applicant refugee status in Canada in the interest of natural justice that should have been observed.

Canada has collaborated and is still collaborating with refugees applicant aggressors against refugee claimants.

Canada government subjecting the applicant to difficulties in life, including using agents of persecution against refugee claimants, and respecting the International Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the United Nations General Assembly resolution 39/46 dated December 10, 1984, that enters into force on June 26, 1987, following Article 27 (1)

Again, tell Justin Trudeau to restore the applicant's refugee status and stop deportation threats against the applicant.

Canada till today, subjecting the applicant to particular difficulties in life after 14 years

SUPPORT THIS PETITION TO STOP DISCRIMINATION, REPRISAL ACTION, AND SYSTEMATIC OPPRESSION AGAINST REFUGEE CLAIMANT: Supporting this petition is not only to support the applicant but also to support thousands of refugees in Canada who have been discriminated against and systematically oppressed, separated from their beloved families, detained, and deported. 

Tell the Prime Minister, Hon. Justin Trudeau, to reinstate the applicant's convention refugee status attached to client ID 5921-1644.

It may surprise you to know that the Canadian Immigration Board Member who committed these atrocities is Paul Robitaille, now the member of the Quebec National Assembly (MNA) at the Quebec Liberal Party, representing the constituency of Bourassa.

We, the petitioner, Ekens Foundation International, known as Ekens Foundation Canada, a think tank civil and political rights campaigner, are helping rejected refugees, asylum seekers, and the oppressed globally. Details at https://ekensfoundation.org/ You may use this link to support us by way of a voluntary financial donation if you wish to.

Kindly share with friends, family, and communities around you to sign the petition: https://www.change.org/ekensfoundationinternational