Decision Maker

Virginia State Senate

Start a petition

The Virginia State Senate is the upper chamber of the Virginia General Assembly, the legislative body for the Commonwealth of Virginia. It consists of 40 members who are elected every four years from single-member districts across the state. Each senator represents an average of around 200,000 residents. The State Senate is responsible for crafting and voting on legislation, which often includes issues like education, healthcare, transportation, and public safety. The body holds a considerable influence over state policy, budget, taxation, and other significant decisions. The Lieutenant Governor of Virginia serves as the presiding officer of the State Senate.


Petitions directed towards Virginia State Senate


Responses from Virginia State Senate

5
  • Virginia State Senate’s response to: All Virginians deserve healthcare

    Thank you for your support of Medicaid expansion! I have voted to keep our tax dollars in Virginia to support giving more people access to Heath Care. I will continue to be a strong supporter and will stand with Governor McAuliffe in this fight. Thank you for contacting me and for lending your voice to this cause! Together we can make a difference! Lionell Spruill, Sr Delegate
    Read more
  • Virginia State Senate’s response to: Allow Virginians to Keep Their Health Insurance!

    Thank you for your recent correspondence expressing your concern regarding the 250,000 Virginians who will lose their current health insurance policies because their insurance plans are not compliant with the provisions within the Affordable Care Act (ACA). I appreciate you taking time to share your opinion with me about this important issue. I have shared your frustration over the last year with the mandates from the federal government regarding our health care and the broken promise that under the ACA "if you like your policy you can keep it." In order to combat this problem I have introduced Senate Bill 5014. This legislation allows health insurance companies the abilities to offer to renew any health insurance plan that would have been discontinued for not meeting requirements set forth in the ACA. There is an emergency clause in this legislation so that if it is passed it would take effect immediately. Senate Bill 5014 was passed out of the Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor and is awaiting a vote on the Senate Floor. This legislation has been before the General Assembly before however,and it was rejected. It is my hope that now, because Republicans are again in the majority in the Senate of Virginia, we will be able to pass Senate Bill 5014 and prevent the disastrous - and costly - effects of the ACA from being immediately implemented. As your representative in the Virginia State Senate, I realize the importance of your input. Please continue to keep me aware of issues that are of significance to you. Additionally, please feel free to contact my office if there is any other matter with which I may assist you. With kindest regards, I remain Very Truly Yours, Thomas K. Norment, Jr.
    Read more
  • Virginia State Senate’s response to: National Park Service: Save Jack's Boathouse from Closure!

    Jack's Boathouse is a D.C. institution! Keep it open!
    Read more
  • Virginia State Senate’s response to: The Virginia General Assembly: Block the Confirmation of Helen Dragas

    One of the responsibilities of the legislature is to confirm appointments by the Governor. As the ranking member of the Privileges and Elections Committee, I have a heightened responsibility. My usual approach is to support any governor's selections unless the appointee has a conflict of interest or refuses to fill out required paperwork. This year we face confirmation of Helen Dragas for a second term on the University of Virginia Board of Visitors. She does not have any conflict of interest and she is willing to fill out the paperwork. Nonetheless, I will be actively opposing her reappointment for the following reasons: • The University of Virginia has a culture of self governance and democratic process. The Rector's actions were not in the spirit of that culture. The decision to remove President Sullivan was made without any transparency or full debate and, thus, was out of line with the principles established by Mr. Jefferson when he founded this flagship university. The decision to remove President Sullivan was made without an in person meeting and vote by the full Board of Visitors. Rather, Rector Dragas solicited support in individual phone calls with Board members. To this day, information has not been forthcoming that would meet the standards for removal of the President. • President Sullivan had been hired with much acclaim only eighteen months earlier. Dissatisfaction with her leadership had never been discussed in official Board meetings or with her, with the result that the President was blindsided when Rector Dragas told her she had sufficient votes of Board members for her removal. • One of the core responsibilities of the Board of Visitors, led by the Rector, is to hire or remove the university president. When the Board acts on that responsibility, its role becomes critically important. It appears that the Rector and the Board did not discharge their responsibility in this situation with an appropriate level of seriousness or professionalism. The person who led the process should accept the consequences. • Ms. Dragas' actions as Rector created turmoil for the University that was unnecessary and unhelpful in pursuing the University's academic mission. The action caused distraction, confusion and disbelief for students, faculty, alumni and donors who had no indication there were questions about the leadership of President Sullivan. The universal and overwhelming response from these groups in opposition to the decision suggests that Rector Dragas and Board members had limited understanding of the University culture. The process of their decision making was, thus, a failure of professional leadership. • The distraction, confusion and disbelief of the summer's events continues with the recent warning issued by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges. Although the public position of the University is that all parties are now working together effectively, I do not believe the various entities can truly move forward with Ms. Dragas remaining on the Board of Visitors. • On December 3, I met personally with Ms. Dragas. We had a frank conversation. It is my conclusion that she does not comprehend the damage done to the University of Virginia, nor does she accept responsibility beyond having poorly managed the President's removal. As a result of these factors, it is my intention to vote against Helen Dragas' confirmation to the Board of Visitors and to move for a recorded vote by the Privileges and Elections Committee and the entire Senate. Janet Howell Senator 32nd District
    Read more
  • Virginia State Senate’s response to: The Virginia General Assembly: Block the Confirmation of Helen Dragas

    Thank you all for contacting me regarding this issue. I have written the Governor a letter asking that he not re-appoint Helen Dragas in the weeks after this became public. Regardless of her intent, it is now very clear that procedurally this was handled very badly in a conspiratorial fashion. The lack of transparency and the lack of fundamental fairness to Doctor Sullivan cannot be remedied unless Rector Dragas steps down or is not approved for re-appointment in the General Assembly. It is my hope that like Mr. Kington, she will do the right thing and resign. However it is my intent to vote against her re-appointment in the legislature. Best Regards, Senator Dave Marsden District 37 Senate of Virginia
    Read more