Petition to Devendra Fadnavis, Devendra Fadnavis
Direct State Police to Arrest Men Who Sexually Exploit Children #AntiChildPredatorSquad
Children are being preyed upon by men who sometimes pay as little as Rs.100 to have sex with a minor. Rati (name changed), was only 14-years-old when she was given hormone injections so that she looks older. She was sometimes forced to have sex with 30 men in a day. These men came from different walks of life, from rickshaw pullers to office managers. When the police raided the brothels, they arrested her and the brothel managers. But these horrible men, the customers, were left off with just a warning. Next day they were back in the brothels seeking young girls again. The Maharashtra government has made Anti-Human Trafficking Units (AHTUs) which are proactively looking at rescue and rehabilitation of girls like Rati. But hardly any men who are paying for sex with children have been arrested. In some cases, they are even made witnesses against the brothel owners. These men are happily living their lives without any fear of prosecution and they continue to exploit children as young as 10-years-old. That’s why I have started this petition asking the Maharashtra CM to direct the state police, specially the AHTUs to make it their mandate to arrest these child predators. Most of these men are living in residential colonies, amongst us, with their families and go completely unnoticed. And these are the men, the customers, who sustain the organised crime of pushing children into prostitution. From red light areas to online portals and even private guest houses and apartments, the places where this exploitation takes place keep changing but what has remains constant is the demand. As long as there is demands from the customers, this horrific illegal trade will continue. I want these men to be arrested so that the society knows their true face and we can safeguard our children against these predators. My state Maharashtra has been leading the efforts against Human Trafficking and I want to applaud all the good work done by our government. The Maharashtra Anti Human Trafficking Unit police shut 78 brothels in 2011 where children were forced into the flesh trade. That number gives an idea about how big this problem is. But just arresting the brothel owners and traffickers is not going to solve this problem. This is an organised crime. We have to curb the demand by arresting these customers under the strictest of laws, like MCOCA (Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act) so that they can’t get bail and it acts as a deterrent for child predators. Join me in this fight and let’s go after these child sex offenders in full force.
Petition to State Duma of Russian Federation
State Duma, adopt the domestic violence law in Russia
По-русски Russia's presidential election will take place on March 18, 2018. We would like to use this opportunity and address our petition to all the presidential candidates. There are more women than men in Russia, we are the majority. You, the candidates, want to represent the interests of Russian citizens. This means you must take into account the interests of the majority. But you keep silent. Why don't you say anything about the pressing issue of domestic violence? In the Russian Federation 40% of all grave violent crimes are committed in a family. Most commonly weak and unprotected family members – women, children, disabled and seniors suffer from domestic violence. Only for 2013 9100 women died from criminal offences, 11300 received grievous bodily harm. Based on the official statistics in 2013 46 thou. of under ages became victims of violent offences. Around 2 thou. died, 3.6 thou. sustained bodily injuries. Half of these crimes were committed at home. According to the official data of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the RF as of December, 2008 212.7 thou. of family troublemakers are registered in police. Number of the registered crimes committed in family has been growing: only for 2002-2006 total number of “family” crimes increased by half. However, one should note that Russia doesn’t have single data collection system for family violence cases; there is no official statistics. Besides, this problem is of latent character. The world practice in the sphere of fighting family violence proved that special law on domestic violence prevention is more effective that separate articles of criminal, civil and administrative legislation. Similar laws already for several years have been effective in the territory of many countries of the Western and Eastern Europe, as well as CIS. Experience of Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Moldova, Kyrgyzstan, the Czech Republic, Lithuania and also other countries showed that cases of domestic violence reduce from 20 to 40% after adoption of similar laws. The existing administrative, criminal and criminal procedural legislation is inefficient. Such cases are initiated only on the basis of statement of the injured party to court submitted in the prescribed form according to the procedure of private prosecution. Herewith, neither police, nor prosecutor’s office participates in such cases. The injured party shall investigate this case itself, collect evidence itself and present it to the court, that is almost impossible for victim in the cases of domestic violence. In most cases family violence happens “behind closed doors” and without third person parties. Commonly victim and abuser live together and submission of a statement on violence case and moreover evidence collection is dangerous for the victim. Besides, evidence collection for the injured person is connected with serious procedural difficulties as all evidence shall be received in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code of the RF; that is difficult enough for a person without legal education. Compared to the accused person, attorney for the defence is not provided for free of charge for private prosecutor and not everyone is able to pay for attorney’s assistance. Besides, private prosecution proceedings are closed due to reconciliation of the parties and there is a threat of pressure to the victim from the abuser’s part. Due to this many injured prefer either not to apply to court at all or after applying they refuse from further fight in connection with long-term case consideration and necessity of continuous participation in it, or in connection with received threats and persecutions from the offenders’ part, or in connection with change of conditions (reconciled, fear of father’s conviction to influence further child’s career etc.). Thus, high latency (concealment) of this kind of crime is observed, when the offender manages to avoid punishment several times. Actually crimes in the family sphere are legalized now. In the meantime, cases of public prosecution are deprived of such defects, as authorized bodies conduct investigation and accusation in the court is supported by a prosecutor. At the same time in the case of family violence, even if criminal case of public prosecution is initiated, the law doesn’t stipulate any remedy for person affected by offender for the period of preliminary inquiry and court hearing. It also seems certain that beatings or bodily injury committed by family member or relative are of more danger to public than the same crimes committed by a stranger. As it has been mentioned, the most frequently, the abuser and the person affected live in the same dwelling house, in connection herewith the injured has to be constantly afraid for his/her safety. Besides, crimes committed towards family members endeavor, including, also family relations and lead to more serious consequences (divorce, disputes regarding children, and in tragic cases – orphancy), then the same crimes committed by strangers. Besides, in order to solve this problem of family violence it is not enough only to change criminal legislation. The existing rules don’t cover suppression, prevention and work with potential offenders and may be applied already after offence or crime commitment. There are no remedies for injured people(protective inscriptions, psychological and legal aid, network of protective shelters, rehabilitation centers etc.). There are no rehabilitation programmes for both victims and criminals. In the meantime, exactly these measures are the most effective to overcome this situation as they are aimed at family violence prophylaxis and prevention. Hereby we demand: - From the presidential candidates - to include the law on domestic violence in their election agenda and promise to pass this law if elected; - From the Government of the RF - to introduce a draft law on domestic violence; - From the State Duma - to introduce the law for reading and adopt; - From the Ministry of Internal Affairs - to create a special domestic violence subdivision, to implement mechanism of protective inscription. This petition will be delivered to: • The Government of the Russian Federation• The State Duma of the RF• The Main Administration of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the RF
Petition to Damien Hinds MP, Theresa May MP
Free Menstrual Products For All Children On Free School Meals #FreePeriods
Millions of children around the world are denied an education. In the UK, every child has the right to go to school but a growing number of them face missing school every month for the simple reason that they can’t afford menstrual products. As a schoolgirl myself, I know we must change this. Period Poverty must go. That's why we are calling on the Government to provide free menstrual products to all children on free school meals. Back in March 2017, UK charity Freedom4Girls, which provides menstrual products to women and girls in Kenya, was approached for donations by a school in Leeds, which had become increasingly concerned about the number of girls recurrently absent from school. Children as young as 11 suffer the shame of using socks, or taping tissue to underwear. It is not only unacceptable, but can seriously jeopardise their health. Tina Leslie, founder of Freedom4Girls, stated, ‘Nobody thinks it’s happening here, but it is happening here.’ Period poverty has always existed and, up until recently, nothing has been done to tackle the issue head-on. Period taboo meant these children don’t feel comfortable to speak freely and openly about their struggles. It means we may never know the full extent of this problem. We need to escort period shame out of the door and mobilise the government so that children from the lowest income backgrounds are not marginalised. No child should be held back because they bleed. Yes, ideally, we would strive to convince the Government to provide free menstrual products to ALL children in the UK. This is the first step towards that. What is encouraging is that, earlier this year, for the first time in history, the House of Lords debated menstrual product provision - a bold and momentous step towards eradicating Period Poverty forever. And Baroness Burt of Solihull, incredibly, went one step further saying: ‘Could we not give sanitary towels to girls who qualify for free school meals? We already know who they are, and the cost of setting up the system would, I am sure, be very small. It would mean that all girls in school could confidently attend school all month round without having to worry about the embarrassment of their period letting them down.’ The conversation has continued. 13 MPs have signed an Early Day Motion ‘Free Provision of Sanitary Products for Girls from Low-Income Families’ proposed by MP Greg Mulholland. Real change doesn’t seem so far away. But we need to take advantage of this momentum and campaign the Government to ensure that action is taken so children on free school meals are given free menstrual provision. Soon. Please sign and share.
Petition to Philip Hammond, Chancellor of the Exchequer
Axe #TamponTax before 2022!
Our Tampon Tax petition succeeded in 2016 when the UK Government agreed to end the sexist 5% 'luxury' tax placed on period products (including tampons and sanitary pads) by 2019. It was a victory to have the government commit to action. But now it's been reported that "EU law would let Britain put a 0 per cent rate on tampons but will not come into force until January 2022 at the earliest."  This is not okay. And means we’ll be stuck with tampon tax until then. Hammond can argue, that as both the UK Parliament pushed for the end of tampon tax and the EU agrees in it’s it’s member states to decide eventually, we should be able to axe tampon tax sooner than the date provided. Philip Hammond, PLEASE fight to reduce this date - and abolish tampon tax as was promised by David Cameron and George Osborne. Brexit is unprecedented which means that we can help to shape it with enough support. PLEASE DO SO to secure the end of tampon tax ASAP. Period!  The Telegraph
Petition to email@example.com , firstname.lastname@example.org
Solve the gender pay gap in universities by redistributing excessive VC/dean salaries
◦Factual salary data show that male academics earn £3,000 to £8,000 or more per year than female academics. The gender pay gap is caused by universities awarding male academics, on average, higher starting salaries and more promotions than women. Close the gender pay gap in universities by redistributing money from the obscene salaries paid to university deans, vice-chancellors and other senior managers, many of whom earn £300,000+ per year from the public purse. Not even our Prime Minister, who leads a country with 66 million people, is paid that. ◦ Women academics are now asking the government to enforce equal pay for equal work or work of equal value in universities because losing £3,000 to £8,000 a year is not small change to us. That is a lot of money to many women struggling against exorbitant house prices, childcare and transport costs. Following the lead of our comrades in other industries, women academics are hereby launching collective action against inequality in our pay. ◦ We welcome the steps taken by Rt Hon Prime Minister Theresa May and Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt (Minister for Women and Equalities) in forcing universities to declare gender pay gaps for the first time in 2018 but we want them to now force universities to actually abolish the gender pay gap. [A] Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt: (1) Please write to universities to instruct them that affected women have the right to make equal pay claims. (2) Introduce a new fine system administered by your Ministry in which universities and other organisations that fail to process equal pay claims in accordance with equal pay law have to pay a fine. (3) Set up a free government helpline with trained advisors to advise women about equal pay claims free of charge. [B] Rt Hon Prime Minister Theresa May: (1) Please introduce a new government policy of fining universities and any organisations that lose equal pay claims to recoup the wasted legal cost to the public (i.e. the cost of employment tribunals). (2) Introduce a new policy that will require any university or organisation that loses an equal pay claim (or any matter of employment law) to pay the employee’s legal costs. (3) Compel universities to close the gender pay gap by redistributing the exorbitant salaries of vice-chancellors, deans and others senior university managers. Please express your support for equal pay for equal work (or work of equal value) for women who work in universities by signing this petition.
Petition to Clare Bettison, Daphne Caine, Alex Allinson, Alfred Cannan MHK;, Ann Corlett, Julie Edge, Juan Watterson, Bill Malarkey, Kate Lord Brennan, Tanya August Hanson
Change the law to make sentencing for domestic violence fit the crime
1:3 women and 1: 6 men will be victims of domestic abuse and violence in their lifetime. On International Women's Day 2018 on the Isle of Man, a man who committed a very violent and sustained assault on his partner in front of her children was given just a suspended sentence for ABH and a fine. Character references and the fact that he is in a managerial position were allowed as "mitigating" factors. Alcohol was listed as an excuse for this behaviour. The Manx public is rightly outraged, and it is time for change. Rulings like this discourage victims from coming forward and going through the Court process. They send the message to victims that they will not be heard, it makes them feel re-victimised. If a fine is given this makes the victim feel, "is that all I am worth? " Rulings like this send out the wrong message to abusers - that doing this is somehow "ok" - many Manx commentators have noted that possession of cannabis would produce a heavier punishment. And using managerial status as a reason for leniency sends out the totally wrong message that men in respected positions are permitted to act in this way. The ruling of the Court displayed a totally inadequate understanding of abuse: The fact that strangulation was involved should have been a major red flag. It is widely recognised that strangulation indicates high risk of domestic homicide. The victim's own level of fear is also an important indicator. She and her children believed this was attempted murder, yet this is not reflected in the sentence. (see the DASH checklist https://www.dashriskchecklist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/DASH-2009-2016-with-quick-reference-guidance.pdf Cruelty to animals or children are other red flags - also present in this case and not understood or acknowledged by this sentence. The status, educational level or occupation of the perpetrator of the assault should be irrelevant to the sentence. It is also irrelevant that this is a "first offence" - that does not make it any less serious, or death any less likely as the outcome. It is entirely inappropriate that character references are admitted to court in mitigation - an abusive person is usually very charming - of course he can get any number of friends to write that he is a lovely man really and this is "out of character". The abuser may well may be a "lovely" and well-respected person in their public life, but in the home, behind closed doors, they are violent, coercive and frightening. The one does not cancel out or excuse the other. This sort of "mitigation" should simply not be allowed in our courts. Alcohol is not a cause of domestic violence - it is often, as in this ruling - used as an excuse. This is entirely inappropriate. The effect on children of witnessing this assault was also not reflected in the sentence. The emotional and psychological effect on the victim is also not reflected in the sentence. Sadly this is only the latest case of many to receive similar treatment. Too many charges are reduced to ABH and dealt with by Magistrates - this in itself sends out a wrong message that these cases are unimportant and low level. We need to consider that the victim was a woman - if this same assault had occurred on a male in a public place, would the charges have been the same? Would the sentence have been the same? Why in 2018 is it somehow considered unimportant that a woman can be violently assaulted in her own home? Why do we still have such inequality under the Law? It is a tragic irony that on the Isle of Man, International Women's Day should be marked by the handing down of a sentence like this. And on an Island that was first to give women the vote! In the year of "Me Too" and other similar campaigns worldwide, why is the Isle of Man still handing out sentences that show it to be lagging years behind the times? An assault that takes place in the home (which should be your safe place) and is perpetrated by someone you have loved and trusted should be seen as more serious than an assault in a public situation, not less. It is domestic terrorism. The Court acknowledged the betrayal of trust, yet did not reflect that in the sentence. It is an imbalance that under the Manx system the perpetrator (or his/her advocate) is permitted to speak in mitigation at the end of the proceedings. Yet the victim is not given the same opportunity to give a victim impact statement. This imbalance adds to the sense of unfairness and not being heard. All too often the comments in mitigation and the character references add to the pain and re-victimisation of the victim. Too often the Manx Courts allow comments belittling the victim or minimising their injuries and suffering. Those who understand abuse know that mimimalisation, denial and blame are the tools of the abuser. Rarely (if ever) do we see any genuine remorse - what we see and hear are excuses. As in this case, comments are allowed about how much the perpetrator has already "suffered" from the ordeal of being arrested and charged - yet while the aggressor gets a Judicial "slap on the wrist" the victim and her children will be living with this for the rest of their lives. In the UK Legislation is imminently going to address these inequalities and these outdated, ignorant attitudes. Please ensure that the Isle of Man does the same: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43145406 For too long victims have been badly let down by a society that does not talk about this and a legal system that does not tackle it appropriately. We need laws that make domestic violence an offence. we need laws that cover coercive control. We need Law that has teeth so that cases can go to criminal court not civil, and so be open to more appropriate sentences. If cases are to be tried before magistrates, then magistrates need powers to give sentences that are no longer insulting, painful and entirely inappropriate to the offence. The use of fines in place of custodial sentences for domestic violence should be abolished. They are no deterrent and they hurt and insult victims. We need victim impact statements in all Court proceedings, whether Civil or Criminal. Training in abuse for the Judiciary and Magistrates should be made compulsory so that cases are no longer tried before people who have inadequate understanding of the dynamics of abuse, and so that outdated, stereotyped thinking no longer directs our sentencing. Please help the voice of the victims - 1:3 of us - to be heard on this Island. Please listen to the voice of the Manx public - male and female - who are appalled by this sentence and by all sentences like it; by the wrong messages that are being sent by these sentences, and by the revictimisation of victims by the current system. Let this case be the one that finally results in change. Families need justice. Thank you.
Petition to Theresa May MP, Amber Rudd MP, Boris Johnson MP
Help end violence against women by ratifying the Istanbul Convention
On the 8th June 2012 the UK Government promised to get serious about ending violence against women. They promised a law - the 'IC' - that would dramatically change the lives of all women in the UK. Through the law they promised to: Prevent violence against women Protect women who are experiencing violence Prosecute perpetrators of violence We are demanding the UK Government keeps this promise. We don’t have time to wait. Every week an average of 2 women are killed by a partner or ex-partner in the UK. In England and Wales at least 233 women are raped every day and 31% have experienced domestic abuse since the age of 16. Support services are overwhelmed and underfunded. 112 women and their 84 children were turned away from refuge on just one day this year. We need to change this. And this law - the Istanbul Convention (IC) on Violence Against Women - is about making changes that have impact. It will make violence against women and domestic violence the priorities they should be. Some of the many groundbreaking changes in the IC law are: Preventing further cuts to domestic violence refuges and specialist support services Providing sufficient shelters and sexual violence referral centres, psychological support, a free 24/7 helpline and legal aid Providing education on topics such as domestic violence, personal integrity and healthy relationships Criminalising issues such as FGM, forced marriage and psychological abuse Ensuring all women have access to support– regardless of race, religion, disability or any other identity And the IC offers much more. With the IC, the UK Government have promised real change. Women deserve this change. Change is within reach: I see change – do you? #ICchange
Petition to Theresa May, Jeremy Corbyn, Vince Cable, all party leaders and Parliament
50:50 Parliament want a more gender balanced, representative Parliament. Join us!
In Parliament men outnumber women by more than 2:1, there are 208 women MPs and 442 men. Only 12 extra women were elected to Westminster after the 2017 general election, at this rate it will take 50 years to get a truly equal and representative Parliament. 50:50 aspire to a modern Parliament consisting of around 50% men and 50% women. Our target is clear because what gets measured gets managed. This is a majority issue, women are the majority in life but the minority in Parliament. If Parliament is inaccessible to women many others must and do face hurdles too. One way or another this needs sorting. If you agree then say so and SIGN. Let's build a better and more representative democracy together! This is what our petition letter to the party leaders says: "Theresa May, Jeremy Corbyn, Vince Cable, all party leaders and Parliament, We need a more gender balanced House of Commons, around 50:50 men and women. Please collaborate and do something: debate and take action to make Parliament more gender balanced, like life." Our petition is not prescribing the solutions but asking those with the power to take action. This is a historic democratic deficit and institutional imbalance that needs to be addressed. An inclusive, gender balanced Parliament would lead to more responsive and informed decision making, everyone would benefit. 50:50 Parliament also aim to inspire, support and encourage political participation with our #AskHerToStand campaign. Let's get 117 more women to Westminster at the next election. If you know a woman who would make a good MP then ask her to stand, 50:50 is here to help, see http://www.5050parliament.co.uk/askhertostand/. All political parties agree that a gender balanced Parliament would be better, see this video clip here, so SIGN to ask for action. For more information and to join 50:50 go to www.5050Parliament.co.uk. 50:50 Parliament is an inclusive, cross party, non-partisan campaign. To read more about why this matters and the many solutions see the 50:50 Parliament submission to the Women and Equalities Select Committee Inquiry here. Only 325 women MPs are needed for a 50:50 Parliament which amounts to 1 in every 100,000 women which is great, because clearly politics might not appeal to everyone, but it might suit 1 in 100,000 women and our country needs them. Two comments on the petition say it all: Helen "Apart from the obvious injustice we are in no position to under-utilise so much talent”- Helen, “If the institution of Parliament discourages women to participate, it is the institution that needs to change.” – Malcolm. Add your voice and make a comment on the 50:50 petition. Join us in asking for action concerning this pressing democratic issue. Thank you. Frances, Sadaf, Brian, Tina, Charlie and Nathalie #5050Parliament Team 50:50 Key Links: For more information see www.5050Parliament.co.uk 50:50 submission to Women & Equalities Select Committee Become a 50:50 Ambassador - fill in the form online Stand to become an MP! 50:50 want to support you see #AskHerToStand Like - facebook.com/5050Parliament Follow on Twitter - @5050Parliament See 50:50 Films - 50:50 Parliament on YouTube Buy campaign merch at - 50:50 Parliament Shop 50:50 in the News: Parliament agrees there is a "serious democratic deficit" and #5050Parliament says "There are some great women out there, so let’s start asking them to stand" The Guardian The Guardian reports on launch of #5050Parliament #AskHerToStand campaign "Gender parity among MPs at risk of stalling, say women's groups" Cathy Newman, Channel 4 News supports #5050Parliament in The Telegraph 50:50 Parliament in Marie Claire #IWD2016 50:50 Parliament profiled in The Telegraph, 50:50 Parliament - Huffington Post, Evening Standard The Guardian 50:50 Parliament - Star on Parliamentary TV at Women & Equalities Committee Oral Evidence Session #StripTees 50:50 Key Blogs: Women our Parliament Still Needs You Following in the Footsteps of Fawcett Gender Equality is a Human Right, so Women Need More Seats in Parliament! Family Friendly Parliament Tax on Tampons Is the Tip of the Iceberg Obama says Tampon Tax Is Because ‘Men Were Making the Laws’ Carey Mulligan Demonstrates Support for 50:50Parliament at the Premier of 'Suffragette' 50:50 Films: 50:50 Ambassadors Campaign Video Carey Mulligan supporting 50:50 Parliament at Suffragette Premier & Sisters Uncut Demo Paloma Faith Supporting 50:50 Parliament Gemma Arterton Supporting 50:50 Parliament MPs Supporting #5050Parliament Campaign #5050Parliament at Feminism in London 2015 #5050Parliament at WOW Festival 2015