Williams Elementary School – Key Facts & Community Case for Keeping the School Open

Recent signers:
Yuliya Anisimava and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Williams Elementary School – Key Facts & Community Case for Keeping the School Open

Prepared by Williams Elementary Neighborhood Parents
(Based on San José Unified “Schools of Tomorrow” Implementation Committee Materials)

 
Why This Matters:

San José Unified School District is evaluating potential school consolidations due to declining enrollment. While we support thoughtful, data-driven planning, Williams Elementary does not meet the criteria of a school that should be considered for closure.

 
Williams Elementary: At a Glance

  • Projected Enrollment (2025–26): 529 students
  • Underserved Pupil Percentage (UPP): 15%
  • School Type: Neighborhood elementary school
  • Specialized Programs: None (standard elementary curriculum)
  • Community Access: Walkable for many families

 Key Data-Driven Reasons to Keep Williams Open

1. Williams Is Not Under-Enrolled

With 529 students, Williams is larger than many other elementary schools in the district. Several schools under review have enrollments of 200–350 students. Closing Williams would displace more students than nearly any other option.

Conclusion: Williams does not align with the district’s stated goal of consolidating under-utilized campuses.

 

2.  Williams Is a Proven High-Performing School

  • Williams has been ranked #1 in San José Unified for multiple years.
  • The school has built a long-standing reputation for academic excellence, strong teaching, and family engagement
  • This success is the result of:
    • Stable staff
    • Deep community involvement
    • Years of continuous improvement

 
3. Closure Would Cause Significant Student & Family Disruption

  • Over 500 students would need reassignment
  • Increased transportation time and traffic
  • Reduced walk-to-school access
  • Larger class sizes at receiving schools
  • Conclusion: By the district’s own “student disruption” metric, closing Williams creates outsized harm.

 
4. Equity Impacts Would Be Negative

Williams has a low UPP (15%). Nearby schools already serve much higher UPP populations. Redistributing Williams students would:

  • Increase class sizes
  • Strain support services (SPED, counseling, intervention)
  • Reduce resources for students with the highest needs
  • Conclusion: Closing Williams does not advance equity goals and may unintentionally weaken them.

 
5. Williams Strengthens Neighborhood Stability

Williams functions as a true neighborhood school. Neighborhood schools are associated with better attendance, higher parent involvement, and stronger community cohesion. School closures are often permanent, even if enrollment rebounds.

Conclusion: The long-term community cost outweighs short-term financial savings.

 
6. Cost Savings Are Limited Compared to Impact

Large schools like Williams already benefit from economies of scale. Closing smaller, severely under-enrolled campuses yield greater cost efficiency. No specialized program costs exist at Williams to eliminate.

Conclusion: Closing Williams delivers minimal financial benefit relative to the disruption caused.

 
Our Ask:

We respectfully request that the district:

  • Remove Williams Elementary from closure consideration
  • Prioritize consolidation of significantly under-enrolled campuses
  • Preserve high-performing, well-functioning neighborhood schools that meet enrollment, equity, and sustainability metrics
  • Protect academic models that are already succeeding within SJUSD.
  •  Closing Statement:We believe fiscal responsibility and community stability can coexist. By the district’s own data and criteria, Williams Elementary should remain open

Website: https://savewilliams.com/

Follow us on insta: williamsstrongsj

Subscribe for newsletter: https://forms.gle/nfUPNR5NG6dqusN17

Join Whatsapp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/BVpEQRRzumB3uMou96a5p5

 

4,828

Recent signers:
Yuliya Anisimava and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Williams Elementary School – Key Facts & Community Case for Keeping the School Open

Prepared by Williams Elementary Neighborhood Parents
(Based on San José Unified “Schools of Tomorrow” Implementation Committee Materials)

 
Why This Matters:

San José Unified School District is evaluating potential school consolidations due to declining enrollment. While we support thoughtful, data-driven planning, Williams Elementary does not meet the criteria of a school that should be considered for closure.

 
Williams Elementary: At a Glance

  • Projected Enrollment (2025–26): 529 students
  • Underserved Pupil Percentage (UPP): 15%
  • School Type: Neighborhood elementary school
  • Specialized Programs: None (standard elementary curriculum)
  • Community Access: Walkable for many families

 Key Data-Driven Reasons to Keep Williams Open

1. Williams Is Not Under-Enrolled

With 529 students, Williams is larger than many other elementary schools in the district. Several schools under review have enrollments of 200–350 students. Closing Williams would displace more students than nearly any other option.

Conclusion: Williams does not align with the district’s stated goal of consolidating under-utilized campuses.

 

2.  Williams Is a Proven High-Performing School

  • Williams has been ranked #1 in San José Unified for multiple years.
  • The school has built a long-standing reputation for academic excellence, strong teaching, and family engagement
  • This success is the result of:
    • Stable staff
    • Deep community involvement
    • Years of continuous improvement

 
3. Closure Would Cause Significant Student & Family Disruption

  • Over 500 students would need reassignment
  • Increased transportation time and traffic
  • Reduced walk-to-school access
  • Larger class sizes at receiving schools
  • Conclusion: By the district’s own “student disruption” metric, closing Williams creates outsized harm.

 
4. Equity Impacts Would Be Negative

Williams has a low UPP (15%). Nearby schools already serve much higher UPP populations. Redistributing Williams students would:

  • Increase class sizes
  • Strain support services (SPED, counseling, intervention)
  • Reduce resources for students with the highest needs
  • Conclusion: Closing Williams does not advance equity goals and may unintentionally weaken them.

 
5. Williams Strengthens Neighborhood Stability

Williams functions as a true neighborhood school. Neighborhood schools are associated with better attendance, higher parent involvement, and stronger community cohesion. School closures are often permanent, even if enrollment rebounds.

Conclusion: The long-term community cost outweighs short-term financial savings.

 
6. Cost Savings Are Limited Compared to Impact

Large schools like Williams already benefit from economies of scale. Closing smaller, severely under-enrolled campuses yield greater cost efficiency. No specialized program costs exist at Williams to eliminate.

Conclusion: Closing Williams delivers minimal financial benefit relative to the disruption caused.

 
Our Ask:

We respectfully request that the district:

  • Remove Williams Elementary from closure consideration
  • Prioritize consolidation of significantly under-enrolled campuses
  • Preserve high-performing, well-functioning neighborhood schools that meet enrollment, equity, and sustainability metrics
  • Protect academic models that are already succeeding within SJUSD.
  •  Closing Statement:We believe fiscal responsibility and community stability can coexist. By the district’s own data and criteria, Williams Elementary should remain open

Website: https://savewilliams.com/

Follow us on insta: williamsstrongsj

Subscribe for newsletter: https://forms.gle/nfUPNR5NG6dqusN17

Join Whatsapp group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/BVpEQRRzumB3uMou96a5p5

 

The Decision Makers

San Jose Unified School Board
4 Members
1 Responded
Nicole Gribstad
San Jose Unified School Board - Area 5
The most impactful thing to do is for you to send a message like this to the recommended list of recipients acknowledging, who in the district so far, have acknowledged your concerns to bring transparency, accountability and to demand a response from the board president, Jose Magaña, other board members, superintendent and Seth Reddy, Chief Business Officer. Will you personalize and do this now to bring the change you’re asking for? ���� Please share and invite other stakeholders: I invite you to join my ongoing real-time Town Hall on WhatsApp to get some of your questions answered. The list of recipients is shared here: https://chat.whatsapp.com/FVFhetSw2Zd2DkubNxtTWZ?mode=gi_t Share and invite other tax payers, stakeholders and supporters to join my ongoing Town Hall discussion. � Blessings, Trustee Gribstad 408-761-7476
Teresa Castellanos
San Jose Unified School Board - Area 1
Brian Wheatley
San Jose Unified School Board - Area 4
San Jose City Council
3 Members
George Casey
San Jose City Council - District 10
Michael Mulcahy
San Jose City Council - District 6
Anthony Tordillos
San Jose City Council - District 3
José Magaña
José Magaña
Board President, SJUSD
Matt Mahan
Matt Mahan
Mayor, San Jose

Supporter Voices

Petition updates