From:
Email; voiceof_americans@yahoo.com

Dear Friends,
I wanted to let you know about a new petition I created on We the People and request for your support. I want your help for the demand of Justice.
As part of a consent order with federal bank regulators, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) (independent bureaus of the U.S. Department of the Treasury), or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Wells Fargo Bank ,N.A. is required for an INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEV under an enforcement actions taken in April 2011 by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve, and Office of Thrift Supervision).This INDEPENDENT FORECLOSURE REVIEV is now underway and is applicable to the underling subject of this Petition.
“Independent Foreclosure Reviewers” are charged with evaluating whether borrowers suffered financial injury through errors, misrepresentations, or other deficiencies in foreclosure practices and determining appropriate remediation. If the review finds that the borrowers suffered financial injury as a result of such practices, this consent orders require remediation to be provided or compensation or other remedy.
I express concern that all of the Federal Regulators and State Authorities including Courts were filed with written complaints and facts thereon of this case raise a potential for several problems, because said agencies failed to provide with “Justice” of their prior investigations, I express concerns and have following few Questions for the said review:
1. Whose figures will they use in determining error or financial loss? Based on the facts of this case, was the completion of foreclosure was justified or is there any Justice? This question alone prompt further FBI investigation.
2. Independent foreclosure review is not being done by the government; the government is only requiring them to be completed. So as to protect the Wells Fargo Bank from jail, who is performing the reviews? An “Independent” reviewer who is hired by Wells Fargo Bank will be reviewing this foreclosure to see if the Wells Fargo Bank who hired them made a mistake? Based on the facts of the struggle for demand of justice for about last two years, this raises red flags and the potential for possible conflicts of interest and bias on the part of the reviewer and Wells Fargo Bank’s response to foreclosure reviewer’s review prompt further FBI investigation.
3. After all, Wells Fargo Bank that made the mistake in the first place and what about those who suffered the greatest loss - the loss of their home? How will they be compensated?
I believe that FBI investigation would be helpful in "bringing some clarity, dignity, and ultimately justice,"
"The circumstances of this foreclosure are so unusual and upsetting that it is difficult to accept the hard facts that Wells Fargo went ahead with such an act of Fraud and prompt further FBI investigation."
You can view and sign the petition here:
http://wh.gov/DAp

Here's some more information about this petition:
ORDER A FBI INVESTIGATION FOR FRAUD. WELLS FARGO BANK ACCEPTED ALL DEFFAULT PAYMENTS & ALSO COMPLETED FORECLOSURE
After a Noticed default of $2,864.20 Dated Nov 17, 2009, Home owner was 2 monthly payments behind as of Nov.17,2009, on Nov.28,2009 Wells Fargo agreed to accept a payment of 3 months pus late fees and asked to pay $5,628.01,but on receipt of $5,628.01 Wells Fargo refused to accept this and returned the payment as un-collected, in the meantime on follow up on Dec.28,2009 Wells Fargo again agreed to accept a payment of $7,493.79; On Dec.31,2009 Wells Fargo collected and accepted entire amounts of default as agreed & confirmed by Wells Fargo Bank amounting to $7,493.79 as due pertaining to Aug-Sep-Oct-Nov-Dec 2009 & Jan 2010 including noticed default plus late fees, and then, there after On Feb. 5,2010 Wells Fargo collected and accepted a following regular scheduled monthly payment $1,478.13 as usual and thereafter On March 11,2010 Wells Fargo returned a regular monthly scheduled payment $1478.13 for March 2010 which was due by March 15,2010 , while keeping all the entire default payments effective Aug 2009 through Feb 2010 ($7493.79+$1478.13) and same time sold the house on March 10.2010 in violation of Cal. Civ. Code §2924c.

INTRODUCTION

This application is made for the demand of Justice and to initiate a criminal investigation because Well Fargo Bank needs to be punished for their crimes.
California Non Judicial Foreclosure laws and regulations provide the opportunities for the homeowners to have their accounts reinstated and the foreclosing process stopped on payment of all amounts of default as due during the mandatory reinstatement period, but this often does not happen to survive the foreclosure, because Banks do not go ahead in compliances with the said California Non-Judicial Foreclosure Procedures instead facts of the this case demonstrates that “Wells Fargo Bank” was fully aware that they are not in compliance with the applicable laws and regulations, even though imposed and completed forced sale.

1. FRAUD:

1.1. I express concerns that this is a matter of fraudulent execution of a Foreclosure which was processed in violation of California Non Judicial Foreclosure Laws and Regulations.
1.2. During the mandatory reinstatement period in the State of California, payment of entire default as due on the day of tender and sufficient to cure default confirming to Cal. Civ. Code 2924c, terminates the right of lender’s to foreclose? This question alone prompt further FBI investigation.

2. DISCRIMINATION:

2.1. I express concerns that this case is a matter of Discrimination. This discrimination is based on differential treatment based on Judicial and Administrative practices and policies that appear neutral but have a disproportionate and unjustifiable impact on our own Citizen’s enjoyment of protected rights (indirect discrimination because of origination and other characteristics)? This question alone prompt further FBI investigation.

3. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION:

3.1. I express concerns that this case is a matter of Human Rights Violation.
3.2. I have “the human right to adequate housing, which is the right of every woman, man, youth and child to gain and sustain a safe and secure home and community in which to live in peace and dignity”.
3.3. All peoples have Right to Self-Determination, for their own ends; freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of economic cooperation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit and the State and federal laws. In no case may a people be deprived of its own means of subsistence? This question alone prompt further FBI investigation.

4. NON-RELATED PARTITIES:

4.1. I concerns that this matters was brought to the Notice of Federal and State Authorities and report of alleged abuse was made. A list of named Authorities; Appears in the appendix.
4.2. I concerns that those Non-Related Parties have the obligations to ensure that there is no direct or indirect discrimination and injustice in the application of State and federal law or practices and that in addition all our own Citizens are protected against discrimination, both in the public and private spheres. Non-Related Parties are accountable for their ineffective enforcement of law and practices that discriminate among our own Citizens? This question alone prompt further FBI investigation.
4.3. I applied to Federal Court at Sacramento and State Court at Stockton for a Court Order for FBI to initiate an investigation of Forced Foreclosure, but both the Courts denied the request based on the Jurisdictions of Court and their other limitations, Honorable Judge of the State Civil Proceedings during hearing made the oral observations, to file the complaint on the criminal part with AG or Demand of Justice from President.
4.4. I concerns that a criminal investigations is essential to prevent identified parties from continuing to engage in unfair and illegal business practices and to protect the California Home Owners of Public Harm from the Criminal Enterprise of Wells Fargo Bank in the future.
4.5. I concerns that Wells Fargo Banks should not be protected at the cost of PUBLIC to let exploit the Citizens of this Country.
4.6. I concerns that Wells Fargo Banks should not be let loose to go-ahead with “CLEAN HANDS”, when this case, that is a proof of evidence that Wells Fargo Bank collected and accepted all the Default payments as due and there after collected and accepted regular monthly payments.“Wells Fargo Bank” broke plenty of Federal and State of California laws, why “Courts and regulators” can not? ; Do anything? Except to do “INJUSTICE”. Is this is matter of complete failure of our Judicial and Administrative System? This question alone prompt further FBI investigation.
4.7. California Foreclosure Laws are made to protect the people of California, not to punish the people of California. Wells Fargo Bank broken the law, there should be criminal penalties for Criminal Violation of State and Federal Laws.
4.8. I express concern that the pattern of the Foreclosure completed by the Wells Fargo Bank that is a demonstration of “the continued existence of practice in either intended to or with the effect of discriminating among own our own Citizens, despite the constitutional provisions to outlaw such discrimination and practices?” This question alone prompt further FBI investigation.
4.9. Thus it is clear, notwithstanding that the practices that discriminate among our own Citizen, such practices persist herein, many of those practices are still in force and continue to be applied, in the State of California of USA and that have an impact on the enjoyment by some of our own human rights and the process of development, thereby preventing Citizens of California from enjoying the full realization of their human rights”.
4.10. I concerns that the refusal of Wells Fargo’s to perform legal mandatory reinstate of the account, and; the discriminatory nature of application of California Non Judicial Foreclosure procedures and practices; and the facts of the Completed Foreclosure that, particularly in the context of property rights, this may reinforce the cause of action for “Human Right’s Violation” and “Discrimination” among our own Citizens.

APPENDIX
1. DEFENDANT PARTIES:
1.1. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A, d/b/a WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC; 1000, BLUE GENTIAN RD STE 300 EAGAN MN-55121 FAX-866-917-1877 `Agent for service of process is Corporation Service Company, which will do business in California as CSC- Lawyers Incorporating Service, and is located at:2730 Gateway Oaks Drive, Ste.100, Sacramento, CA 95833
1.2. CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORP.,525 S MAINM EL CAJON,CA-92022 PH :619-590-9200; and Agent for service of process is National Registered Agents, Inc located at:2875 Michelle Dr. Ste. 100, Irvine, CA 95206
1.3. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B. ; Agent for service of process is CRAIG G BLUNDEN,3756 ,Central Ave, RIVERSIDE CA 95206.
2. NON- PARTIES CO-CONSPIRATORS.
2.1. Mr. Audra Hutton, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, MAC X2302-02J, 1HOME CAMPUS, DES MONIES, IA-50328-0001Mr. Audra Hutton is responsible for false filling( a criminal offence) with Federal Authorities OCC’s Case No-XXXX2539 and ref Wells Fargo’s file No -AH/708/XXXXX4467
3. ATHORITIES HAVING INFORMATION IN THEIR FILES:
3.1. COMTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY,
Agency File:CASE FILE NUMBER XXX22539
Customer Assistance Group, 1301,
McKinney St, Suit # 3450, Houston TX- 77010
1-800-613-6743;
3.2. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISION,
Agency File:CASE RE: FTC REF No. XXX70502
Consumer Response Center, 600, Pennsylvania Ave,
NW Washington, DC -20580
3.3. SENATOR DIANEE FEINSTEIN
File ref- Loan #XXXXX4467 of WELLS FARGO BANK
One Post Street, Suite 2450, San Francisco, CA 94104;
3.4. STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOJ; PIU, PO BOX 944255,
Sacramento CA-94244;
REF-PIU-XXX837; Complaint dated 10/25/2010