UNDER HUMAN RIGHTS,

A child has desires that should not be suppressed but encouraged by the authorities.

A child named "LADY ELLE OPHELIA MELITA" was mistakenly abducted 5 years ago. 

This young adult no longer falls under the Children Act 1989, there is no court order yet held in unlawful detention for improper placement (false imprisonment) 

She is to returned and reunited

            with her maternal family IMMEDIATELY ! 

 Since Brexit came into effect in 2016, many families have suffered not only from refugees, but also from families in the UK whose homes have been ransacked, loved ones lost and subjected to extreme violence and persecution.

Yes, the mother was wrongly arrested, imprisoned, assaulted, attacked (beaten),  Mother was discriminated against for knowing the law and had studied the law (human rights) When it came to self-representation as no one was helping, the judge gagged her openly in the courtroom ,with a prison threat for 6 years, should she speak to anyone in the world about it,

this racist Judge deprived her of all positions making another comment " That it is a shame and a damage to the child that she has an accent " 

  With every attempt to dismiss the case, numerous courts jumped, with name changes (under aliases) and court hearings under new case numbers that previously gave 9 case numbers for the same case for dismissal

  In the end there is nothing in the system as everything was under a false identity with a Polish extradition suspect.

(The Family are not polish, neither  
            speak, write nor understand the language.

The suspect is a Polish politician named

                       "MARIA IRENA BIEŃKOWSKA"

there is no connection to her Ladyship )

This young adult must return with immediate effect

The mother's ID was illegally captured by ransacking (without warrant) the family's home, stealing the child from the relative, threatening the relative, and bullying her for remaining silent ever since
The mother's DNA was collected after the 3rd day of arrest and was not brought to justice by the police (police denied to had taken the DNA) because the suspect looked different from her.

 Police covered up their mistake by providing evidence in the form of a black and white photo of the suspect, which means that a color photo would show that the color of the eyes was different from the mothers The suspect is also much taller than the mother

A translator was called in to prevent the mother from being seen or heard as her German / Swiss accent would reveal the truth

This was a malicious act in order to steal the child.
The child should return soon once the ink has dried. when the case was resolved, only everything under an assigned ID was deleted and the child became invisible.  

The biological data are NOT corrected to this day.

The family suffered isolated for 5 years due to injustice 
Never received an apology, nor was anything corrected ,

Social services never communicated with the mother.due fasly enforced a 94(14) order ,stopping her for any communication to court ,the latest excuse as the gagging order ceased last year a new restriction of contact is in place ,not allowed for contacts 

After a government decision, it is necessary to maintain contacts

 Paragraph § 34 Regular contact should take place at least five times a year. However, the social services seem to have their own rules of even denying mom to contact the authority for communication via email, phone, etc.

Any request from the mother was canceled. No records were made or exchanged. The mother and the child were simply not heard, when the child had expressed as much as possible in drawings, speeches, etc. that it wanted to go home, unfortunately the orchestra is all over their heads

The child has diplomatic immunity, 2 amending orders issued by the mother who is a Junior Judge of the International Human Rights who request the rectification to errors done which reviewed by the Queen's Secretary at the FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office

 also verified as acknowledge by a certified UK Solicitor within ruling of the Law society (government)

The international human rights regulation and the European Court of Justice published the release, all of which were simply ignored.

This is a criminal offense that must be prosecuted as the child is being emotionally manipulated every minute which is a violation  

Enforcing isolation and alienation from the maternal family, as a result of which the young adult is held in improper detention in inappropriate accommodation for no reason or order

(LEGAL TERM FALSE IMPRISONMENT)

Social Services MUST respond as this is an illegal crime and requires criminal prosecution to keep the young adult hostage under emotional manipulation ,

to keep her incarcerated every day by false subsidize placement 

Let's start voting on reunification.

The government must correct the mistake and return the child to where it belongs to its mother