Petition Closed
Petitioning U.S. Congress and 1 other

CREATE LEGISLATION -REMOVE IMMUNITY FROM FAMILY COURT JUDGES

ATTENTION FAMILIES WHO HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE WITH THE FAMILY COURTS/CPS.
WE URGE THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO CONTACT THEIR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND THE FAMILY RESOLUTION CENTER WILL HELP DIRECT CLIENTS TO FIND OUT WHO TO DIRECT COMPLAINTS TO AND TO WRITE CORRECTLY STATED COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE FAMILY COURTS IN ORDER TO CREATE LEGISLATION TO REMOVE IMMUNITY FROM FAMILY COURT JUDGES AND THEIR ACCESS TO OFFICIALS WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC INTEREST WITH TAX PAYER MONEY.

THE FACT THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE LEGALLY REPRESENTS CPS/JUDGES/LAWYERS FOR THE JUDGE AND PROSECUTORS IN FAMILY COURTS IS A DIRECT CONFLICT OF INTEREST. (THE FOX GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PETITION  AGAINST JUDICIAL IMMUNITY IN FAMILY COURTS

The general public is under the impression that all courts and all judges operate under the rule of law as framed by the U.S. Constitution. This is a fact that is not understood as it does not apply to Judicial Discretion as applied in Family Courts and Family Law in Courts across the country.

 

The repeal of Judicial Immunity on behalf of judges and all state actors in Family courts that participate in making decisions dealing with  cases which involve criminal components should be exempt from any form of immunity. Given that "discretion" should not be a factor of  actions which requires strict adherence to the rule of law, focus on factual, often medical, scientific, forensic, high level mental health  services which are beyond the scope of judicial training, expertise or experience. Such frequent acts of over reaching that occur in monumental numbers subject children and families to  a course of action which if  a private person prescribed such action beyond  their realm of competence, would compel an action of practice outside of licensing competence and therefore  constitute a danger to the public welfare.  

 

Judges in family courts suppress as much critical evidence required to understand complexity of cases as those cases on which they rule in ignorance, on "president" or on reliance of  court appointed expert witnesses who are themselves subject to immunity. Issues of child sexual abuse, so often written off casually as - "children lie, children are brain washed, or - "the parent simply would not do that" allows criminal acts to continue with impunity. Holding judges and court actors culpable for their actions and decisions would level the playing fields in which retribution could in fact be exacted by the victim of a judicial or prosecutorial incorrect legal venue subjecting the victim  and those related to the primary vicitm to incalculable suffering.

 

Criminal actions involving domestic violence, sexual abuse and the application of malicious, vexatious vilification of a former spouse in custody proceedings through the use of toxic diagnoses which seek to destroy the reputation of that spouse and change of custody of minor children are recommended to be removed to criminal court, where rule of law prevails.

 

Judicial immunity means that a judge is exempt from any form of punishment for an incorrect ruling based on the judges discretion in the course of official conduct no matter how inept, illiterate, biased, incompetent, negligent, ignorant and in violation of the statutes. Even if a decision is made with corrupt, malicious intent .

 

Immunity in all forms allows those subject by immunity to lie, cheat, steal and benefit by their criminal acts, while destroying the lives of those effected. Family court moves cases via a nexus of staff which profit massively whether through power, wealth, influence.

 

Letter to
U.S. Congress
International Family Courts
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Congress.

PETITION AGAINST JUDICIAL IMMUNITY IN FAMILY COURTS

The general public is under the impression that all courts and all judges operate under the rule of law as framed by the U.S. Constitution. This is a fact that is not understood as it does not apply to Judicial Discretion as applied in Family Courts and Family Law in Courts across the country.

The repeal of Judicial Immunity on behalf of judges and all state actors in Family courts that participate in making decisions dealing with cases which involve criminal components should be exempt from any form of immunity. Given that "discretion" should not be a factor of actions which requires strict adherence to the rule of law, focus on factual, often medical, scientific, forensic, high level mental health services which are beyond the scope of judicial training, expertise or experience. Such frequent acts of over reaching that occur in monumental numbers subject children and families to a course of action which if a private person prescribed such action beyond their realm of competence, would compel an action of practice outside of licensing competence and therefore constitute a danger to the public welfare.

Judges in family courts suppress as much critical evidence required to understand complexity of cases as those cases on which they rule in ignorance, on "precedent" or on reliance of court appointed expert witnesses who are themselves subject to immunity. Issues of child sexual abuse, so often written off casually as - "children lie, children are brain washed, or - "the parent simply would not do that" allows criminal acts to continue with impunity. Holding judges and court actors culpable for their actions and decisions would level the playing fields in which retribution could in fact be exacted by the victim of a judicial or prosecutorial incorrect legal venue subjecting the victim and those related to the primary vicitm to incalculable suffering.

Criminal actions involving domestic violence, sexual abuse and the application of malicious, vexatious vilification of a former spouse in custody proceedings through the use of toxic diagnoses which seek to destroy the reputation of that spouse and change of custody of minor children are recommended to be removed to criminal court, where rule of law prevails.

Judicial immunity means that a judge is exempt from any form of punishment for an incorrect ruling based on the judges discretion in the course of official conduct no matter how inept, illiterate, biased, incompetent, negligent, ignorant and in violation of the statutes. Even if a decision is made with corrupt, malicious intent .

Immunity in all forms allows those subject by immunity to lie, cheat, steal and benefit by their criminal acts, while destroying the lives of those effected. Family court moves cases via a nexus of staff which profit massively whether through power, wealth, influence.

Sincerely,