గౌరవనీయులైన భారత రాష్ట్రపతి మరియు గౌరవనీయులైన భారత ప్రధాన న్యాయమూర్తి గారికి,

దేశ ప్రజలందరి తరుపున మీకు విన్నవించుకుంటున్నది ఏమనగా…

చంద్రబాబు నాయుడికి సంబంధించిన, గత ౩౦ సంవత్సరాలలో విచారణ జరపకుండా కొట్టివేయబడిన, భయపెట్టటం లేదా లబ్ది చేకూర్చటం ద్వారా ఉపసంహరించుకోబడ్డ కేసులను తిరిగి CBI ద్వారా విచారణ జరిపించాలి.

Her Excellency, the President of India,

His Excellency, the Chief Justice of India,

Namaste,

I can proudly say that I am the only person in this country who has stopped financial fraud companies from looting thousand crores of money from the poor every month.

On behalf of all the people of the country, my request is…

The cases related to Chandrababu Naidu, Opposition leader of A.P., which were dismissed without trial and withdrawn by intimidation or benefit, in the last 30 years should be re-investigated by the CBI.
 

Getting stay orders on the cases of financially strong politicians and then not even allowing the central and state government investigation agencies to investigate those cases, creates impatience and mistrust of the people in the judicial system. How justified is it for the courts to reject the cases filed by various people, without examining the facts and investigating the financial issues worth hundreds of crores raised by them.
 
If the investigation proves that it is a false case, appropriate action can be taken. If the public can also watch directly during the investigation of such matters, people will have an understanding of the performance of lawyers and judges. The main reason for this is that the lawyers on behalf of the accused who are facing such corruption charges are arguing in favor of them in the courts saying yes in one case and no in another case.
 
An example of this is former Member of Parliament and High Court Advocate Undavalli Arun Kumar verses Cherukuri Ramoji Rao case. In the case where thousands of crores of illegalities related to Margadarshi chit funds were unearthed, it was declared in the courts that the company was not belong to Ramaji Rao, and in another case, it’s belong to him.
 
The case has been ongoing for nearly 20 years. Can high courts deal same manner with a common man also?
 
People feel that courts are protecting the criminals from impunity by serving time till their last breath. A situation has arisen in these Telugu states where people do not dare to come forward to file cases against any political leader or illegal earner. Even after the information given by the public is brought to the attention of the central and state investigation agencies by some prominent people, they file basket without minimum investigation and they will not bring that information into light. Similar thing happened in my case too. 

By spending the money from my pocket when tried to investigate these corrupt people, with the help of the courts, they were easily made dismissed the cases without even accepting the investigation of their corruption matters due to their financial strength.
 
For the courts to prevent prosecution of allegations of corruption, whether it is minor or major issue, is to welcome corruption. If it is proved that the petitioner is not honest in the investigation by the central, state investigation agencies, the reputation of that accused will increase and not decrease. In such circumstances the cost of salaries of investigating officers may be recovered from the petitioner.
 
If a person does not have faith in the state investigation agencies, unless the courts direct the investigation by the central investigation agencies, the dismissal of cases on some petty political or technical ground will encourage corruption in this country. For those who have worked for the political parties and those who are in the political parties are given positions in the High Court and the Supreme Court, it is like opening the doors for corruption. Even when there are huge corruption allegations against such judges, even if someone comes forward with primary information, the Supreme Court does not allow them to be investigated. An example of this is the former Supreme Court Chief Justice N.V.Ramana case.
 
Today all these things are going down to the lower level people saying that social media is a virtue.
 
When the investigation agency arrests Chandrababu Naidu with the evidence in the skill development case, the judges of the present Supreme Court must have observed  that the lawyers from the lower level court to the High Court and the Supreme Court act in such a way that judges become panic. Tens of counter filings in just one case, creating a situation where the judge cannot announce the judgment immediately and creating a restrictive environment, and showing that people are looking at the accused person as a God. All these things happened regularly in the media.
 
Even now, if you re-investigate the cases related to the financial exploitation of thousands of crores of politicians in Telugu states from the last 30 years, which were previously dismissed without trial, withdrawn by intimidation or benefit, you will understand the performance of that time judges and many huge irregularities.
 
Former Chief Minister YS Rajasekhar Reddy filed 13 petitions between 1999 and 2004 seeking an inquiry into Chandrababu Naidu's assets.
Another petition filed by Rajasekhar Reddy and other Congress leaders was dismissed by the court. Later in the year 2000, YS Rajasekhara Reddy filed a civil appeal in the Supreme Court on the same petition. 
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition on 28 October 2008.
 
It is said that the same YS Rajasekhar Reddy withdrew the petitions filed against Chandrababu Naidu under pressure.
 
In 2005, Lakshmi Parvathi, wife of former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao, has filed a petition on Nara Chandrababu Naidu in the ACB court seeking to order an ACB investigation on the assets acquired by him from the time he won as an MLA for the first time in 1978 till he became the Chief Minister.
 
On March 14, 2005, the ACB court ordered an ACB inquiry into the matter. Chandrababu Naidu approached then Andhra Pradesh High Court seeking a stay on the trial.
 
The High Court issued a stay order on the order issued by the ACB court for investigation. The High Court rejected the petitions filed by Lakshmi Parvathi in April 2005 to quash the stay order.
 
In August 2011, Lakshi Parvathi approached the High Court again seeking to hear her petition. It is pending.
 
In 2018, the Supreme Court felt that stay orders were an obstacle to the progress of trial proceedings in trial courts across the country, especially in cases registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
 
With this, the stay granted by the High Court in the investigation of Chandrababu Naidu's illegal assets case has been cancelled. After 14 years, in November 2019, the trial of this case started again in the ACB court.

However, the lawyer for Lakshmi Parvati said that the final order has to be issued on this case and there are further adjournments and the next adjournment is on 24th November, 2021.
 
In 2004, Kanna Lakshminarayana alleged in her petition that Chandrababu had given 500 acres worth of government land at Madapur in Hyderabad to L&T Company at a very cheap price for his own gain.
He alleged that contracts worth Rs.1400 crore were awarded to L&T without inviting tenders. Instead, L&T company has built NTR Trust Bhawan for free. Out of 158 acres belonging to APIIC, 76 acres were given to the L&T company at a cheap price and then united Andhra Pradesh state received Rs. 125 crores loss was alleged.
 
Chandrababu, who showed his income from agriculture during the period 1989 to 1994, was asked how his income became Rs.19 crore by April 1999. 
 
In response to a petition in June 1988, Chandrababu filed an affidavit stating that he was getting Rs.36 thousand income from agriculture. In October 1994, he disclosed to the Registrar of Companies in Hyderabad that he had no dealings with Heritage Food Company, of which he was the managing director. All these details are included in this petition. Details of these allegations have been provided in the previous petitions.
 
By saying “There is no reason to consider a petition filed before the election”, the High Court dismissed the petition in July 2004 saying, "There is no reason to approach the High Court without consulting the concerned authorities on the allegations made on the transactions."
 
In her petition in 2011, YS Vijayalakshmi alleged that Chandrababu Babu, who was the Chief Minister between 1995 and 2004, had committed abuse of power.
She alleged that state policies were designed according to self-interests and made profits for many businessmen. In that petition, they asked to order a CBI inquiry into this.
 
On November 14 of the same year, the High Court accepted the petition and ordered a CBI investigation. The investigation is scheduled to be completed within six months.
 
However, Chandrababu Naidu approached the Supreme Court to quash the High Court's order for the CBI investigation. On November 23rd, 2011, the Supreme Court rejected his petition and suggested that he can file a petition in the AP High Court seeking a stay on the CBI investigation.
 
The High Court dismissed the case on February 16, 2012, without issuing a stay order on directing a CBI investigation. The High Court dismissed the case which had earlier ordered a trial citing the order passed on November 14, 2011 as violation of fundamental principles.
 
YS Vijayalakshmi approached the Supreme Court questioning the orders of the High Court and the Supreme Court agreed with the High Court's decision and dismissed the petition.
 
If we look at this one issue, we can find for whom the legal system is working in Andhra Pradesh.
 
To vote in favor of the Telugu Desam Party in the Telangana Council elections in May 2015, Elvis Stevenson filed a complaint alleging that he was asked to pay a bribe of 5 crores. On May 30, 2015, an audio tape of a phone conversation between TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu and Stevenson was leaked to the media.
The next day, ACB arrested TDP leader Revanth Reddy for going to give money to Stevenson.
 
On July 28, 2015, the Telangana ACB filed a charge sheet in Hyderabad ACB Court.
Chandrababu Naidu was not mentioned as an accused in it. But ACB mentioned Chandrababu Naidu's name about 22 times in the charge sheet.
 
In 2016, YSRCP leader Alla Ramakrishna Reddy filed a complaint in the ACB court. He accused the Telangana ACB of failing to investigate Chandrababu Naidu's role in the vote note case. As a result, in August 2016, the ACB court ordered the Anti-Corruption Department to investigate Chandrababu Naidu's role.
 
Chandrababu Naidu approached the High Court against the orders of the ACB court. In December 2016, the High Court had issued orders canceling the order for the ACB inquiry, here we need to notice that, the judge who has cancelled the ACB order belongs to Chandrababu Naidu’s community.
 
Alla Ramakrishna Reddy approached the Supreme Court on this in 2017. 
These petitions are pending.
 
It is the opinion of thousands of people that these cases are not devoid of truth if lawyers are being appointed by paying crores of rupees fees to face their corruption charges. If the courts feel that the functioning of the judicial system of this country is linked to the sentiments and sufferings of the people, acknowledge my plea. If we end corruption in Telugu states, it will reduce corruption in this country by 50%. Just like correcting the systems.
 
At one stage the A.P. government made a separate law, during the ruling of Chandrababu Naidu, CBI or any central investigation agencies are not allowed in A.P. without his permission though these people indulge in corruption issues. This Chandrababu Naidu’s law clearly indicates that he was safeguarding all the corrupted people by CBI, ED etc. With this the condition in South, especially in A.P. you people can assess. He made A.P. as if his own kingdom. 
 
In my last 35 years, in Andhra Pradesh, my observation of the functioning of the legal and judicial system has made me lose hope in the Indian judiciary. This is the opinion of lakhs of people in Telugu states, not only mine. Several former IAS officers who have served in key positions in the government sector, the Advocate General directly criticized the corruption of the High Court judges in the press meet itself.
 
Through this letter, I would like to inform you that people of AP and Telangana will have faith in the justice system only when equal justice is done to all the categories people. Necessary measures should be taken to prevent political interference and corruption in the judiciary.
 
I have faced many isses in my life due to the police and legal system. I have seen with my own eyes, the inappropriate lifestyle of some magistrates.
 
At the age of 19 I started my social activities, fighting anti-social elements irrespective of political party involvement by spending my own ethical earnings.
 
At the age of 22, I spent more than 10 lakhs on Krishna Pushkaralu as per the request of the Municipal Commissioner, who worked as the Chief Secretary of AP until a few months ago. I have been continuously fighting against corruption in the police system. 
 
Here is a small example for this. 
 
30 years ago, At the age of 25, I fought for a farmer and got justice.
 
2,500/- delinquency fee was collected from a farmer by a police team for transporting grass from the village to Vijayawada city with overload. When the matter came to my notice at 12 midnight, I reached the spot within 5 minutes and after tough discussions and challenges with the Commissioner of Police, I took the letter issued suspending all the policemen involved in the matter. This is my lifestyle. The incident took place under Vijayawada Police Commissionerate.
 
Generally Vijayawada is accessible through four routes to the city. There are villages around this city and the fodder for the cattle in the city is sold in the city by tractor at night. If a tractor sells fodder (grass) they get only Rs 2500/-. The police take this money completely without any mercy. The reason for this is the targets given to them by the police bosses in the night beat.
 
Depending on the priority given by the Hon'ble President of India and the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India to the above mentioned issues, there will be a chance to know directly from the people at the lower level about the many widespread frauds, malfeasance, money laundering affairs, and the financial deals taking place behind the scenes in foreign countries in the Telugu states.
 
All these things are known to people. But our systems' lack of courage to regulate is a mockery of democracy. Elections have already become a major issue in the South where those who have crores of rupees are eligible. 
 
Only when you focus  on these from the lower level, your highness will be able to know the hidden mafia in the south from the past 30years.
 
Hence I request to give the assurance to this nation “Law is equal to All” and to minimize the corruption courts have to give multiple supports and directions to the investigation departments of State and Central.
 
 Jai Hind

With Warm Regards,
Yours Faithfully,
-Vinaya Sudhakar Medisetty