Parental alienation is hard enough for children and their parents as it is. Why then would anyone also refuse to share photographs of the children in their care, with the other parent?

It is cruel psychological abuse of that parent, nothing more. It is a form of withholding communication. It leaves blanks in the mind of the other parent only vivid imagination can replace. Is the child suffering?, injured? being abused? neglected? Or worse??!

What is the basis of the denial of photographs?

Isnt this denial also an insinuation the other parent intends to use the photographs for some kind of evil perhaps? Is it an insinuation the other parent is unworthy to look upon their children?? Or it will provoke violence or some other unpredictable unwanted behaviours? Also an insinuation about the character and behaviour of the other parent.

Has the child been moved without the other parents knowledge and providing photographs will be a way to locate them?

Refusing to communicate is a hostile response in anyone's language. Denying an interested alienated parent, photographs, is then a further layer of that insult.

Let's grow as a community and find ways to take action against abusive indirect defamation like refusal to communicate with the other parent of children in your care and refusal to provide photographs to the alienated other parent.

Human rights ARE everyone's rights.