Play Video "Economic Impacts to Rent Control"​

Play Video "A Case Against Rent Control"

A CASE AGAINST RENT CONTROL IN SAN JOSE

To someone ignorant of economic reasoning, rent control seems like a great policy. It deceivingly appears to instantly provide “affordable housing” to poor tenants, while the only apparent downside is a reduction in the income flowing to landlords. Who could object to such a policy? Consider the following:

Effects of rent control in the short run:  

•  Rent control immediately leads to a shortage of apartments, meaning that there are potential tenants who would love to move into a new place at the going (rent-controlled) rate, but they can’t find any vacancies.
•  In an unhampered market, the equilibrium rental price occurs where supply equals demand, and the market rate for an apartment perfectly matches tenants with available units. If the government disrupts this equilibrium by setting a ceiling far below the market-clearing price, then it creates a shortage. More people want to rent apartment units than landlords want or are able to provide.

Effects of rent control in the long run:

• A permanent policy of rent control restricts the construction of new apartment buildings, because potential investors realize that their revenues on such projects will be artificially capped. Building a movie theater or shopping center is more attractive on the margin.

Underlying problems with rent control:

• With a long line of potential tenants eager to move in at the official ceiling price, landlords do not have much incentive to maintain the building. They don’t need to put on new coats of paint, change the light bulbs in the hallways, or get out of bed at 5:00 a.m. when a tenant complains that the water heater is busted.
• If a tenant falls behind on the rent, there is less incentive for the landlord to cut the tenant some slack, because he knows he can replace the tenant right away after eviction.

• Another reason many economists, including Paul Habibi,  a professor of finance and real estate at the UCLA, are skeptical of rent control is that unlike public housing and other forms of government assistance, whether someone benefits from rent control has nothing to do with their income. “You could have an attorney making a quarter of a million dollars living in a rent stabilized property, meanwhile, someone who makes only a fraction of that is living in a market rate building.”

In summary, if the goal is to provide affordable housing to lower-income tenants, rent control is a failed policy, it has failed in cities such as New York and Los Angeles, just to name a few. Rent control makes apartments cheaper for some tenants while making them infinitely expensive for others, because some people can no longer find a unit, period, even though they would have been able to at the higher, free-market rate. Furthermore, the people who remain in apartments — enjoying the lower rent —receive a much lower-quality product. Especially when left in place for decades, rent control can quite literally destroy large portions of a city’s housing.

Please sign Petition No to Further Rent Controls.  Visit TheAptExperts.com to sign the petition and for schedule of the city hearing on this topic.

Thank you for your support,

The Apartment Experts and Real Estate Investment Experts Team

Kim Oanh Pham and Raul Richardson