Preservation Review Board: support a mosque development and the Historic Code

The Issue

Support a mosque development that also respects McKinley Heights Historic Code in the following ways:

  1. Is located on the Corner. - Code 501.2 requires that “new construction in the Corridor must respect the existing scale of any surrounding historic structures by seeking to minimize the difference in height, mass, fenestration, and location.”  This is important because the character of our historic buildings is part of what gives our neighborhood its desirability. The proposed development violates this code by ignoring the existing historic structures.
  2. Enhances the Streetscape. - Code 501.3 requires that new “commercial structures shall be positioned on the lot to not only enhance the commercial location but also to be compatible with the surrounding streetscape.” This is important because it maintains the urban fabric of our City, in this case, a commercial corridor. The proposed development violates this code by locating its building behind the existing buildings.
  3. Parking behind the Building - Code 504 requires that “all commercial parking be located behind the building.” Cities are about people, not about cars. Cities are planned around a pedestrians relationship to their city. Parking in the back puts the pedestrian first by continuing the Streetscape at the sidewalk.

This case is important because:

  • The historic code adds to the urban vitality and economic development that has occurred in our area since its’ inception ten years ago.
  • The development at Jefferson and Allen is an important and highly visible corner property marking the boundary of our neighborhoods to the many who travel Jefferson Avenue. daily.
  • All developers and homeowners are expected to follow our historic code. This case is no different. The developer knowingly chose a site within a historic district. 
  • This case sets a precedent for future cases. If we allow a development with major historic variances to get an exception from the PRB, what will the PRB allow next time?

Having a development that both fulfills the needs of its program and maintains the historical character of its neighborhood is the best outcome for the community as a whole.

This petition had 89 supporters

The Issue

Support a mosque development that also respects McKinley Heights Historic Code in the following ways:

  1. Is located on the Corner. - Code 501.2 requires that “new construction in the Corridor must respect the existing scale of any surrounding historic structures by seeking to minimize the difference in height, mass, fenestration, and location.”  This is important because the character of our historic buildings is part of what gives our neighborhood its desirability. The proposed development violates this code by ignoring the existing historic structures.
  2. Enhances the Streetscape. - Code 501.3 requires that new “commercial structures shall be positioned on the lot to not only enhance the commercial location but also to be compatible with the surrounding streetscape.” This is important because it maintains the urban fabric of our City, in this case, a commercial corridor. The proposed development violates this code by locating its building behind the existing buildings.
  3. Parking behind the Building - Code 504 requires that “all commercial parking be located behind the building.” Cities are about people, not about cars. Cities are planned around a pedestrians relationship to their city. Parking in the back puts the pedestrian first by continuing the Streetscape at the sidewalk.

This case is important because:

  • The historic code adds to the urban vitality and economic development that has occurred in our area since its’ inception ten years ago.
  • The development at Jefferson and Allen is an important and highly visible corner property marking the boundary of our neighborhoods to the many who travel Jefferson Avenue. daily.
  • All developers and homeowners are expected to follow our historic code. This case is no different. The developer knowingly chose a site within a historic district. 
  • This case sets a precedent for future cases. If we allow a development with major historic variances to get an exception from the PRB, what will the PRB allow next time?

Having a development that both fulfills the needs of its program and maintains the historical character of its neighborhood is the best outcome for the community as a whole.

The Decision Makers

Richard Callow
Richard Callow
Chariman of the Preservation Review Board
Melanie Fathman
Melanie Fathman
Preservation Review Board
Hon. Terry Kennedy
Hon. Terry Kennedy
Preservation Review Board
David Richardson
David Richardson
Preservation Review Board
Anthony Robinson
Anthony Robinson
Preservation Review Board

Petition Updates