Tell Instagram to Stop Profiting from Sexually Suggestive Content Involving Children
Tell Instagram to Stop Profiting from Sexually Suggestive Content Involving Children
The Issue
My name is Saurabh Goswami.
I am one person. I have no institutional power behind this. What I have is the evidence, a six-month-old niece, and the conviction that when enough people say enough, things change.
A signature here tells Meta that India's 362 million users are not passive consumers of whatever it engineers into our children's lives. It tells MeitY that citizens expect the laws of this country to apply to a corporation headquartered in California.
- Instagram is doing deliberate, documented, admitted harm to children and profiting from it. India is its largest market. Our regulators have done nothing.
- Meta's own internal research stated: "We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls."
They tried to hide it. The Wall Street Journal published it anyway. - A test account created for a 13-year-old girl received sexualised content within minutes of opening Instagram without searching for anything. Stanford University found Instagram's algorithm was actively recommending accounts selling child sexual abuse material to new users.
- An independent 2025 audit of Instagram's own Teen Accounts safety feature found that 100% of test accounts were recommended sexual content. Instagram earns money from every view.
- A Harvard study found Instagram alone made $4.8 billion in a single year from users aged 17 and under. Children are not just being exposed to this content.
- The platform is engineering them to create it by rewarding mildly suggestive posts with views, likes, and followers, turning sexual performance into school-level social currency.
- 42 US states have sued Meta. The EU has fined Instagram €405 million and opened further proceedings. Australia has banned under-16s from social media entirely.
- India with 362 million Instagram users has done NOTHING!.
What we are asking for:
- Real age verification — not a date-of-birth checkbox
- Independent public audit of Instagram's recommendation algorithm in India
- No monetisation of sexually suggestive content — no bonuses, no subscriptions for it
- Trial Reels and viral amplification off by default for all minor accounts
- Monthly transparency reports on what Indian minor users are being shown
- MeitY to enforce laws that already exist — Meta is not above Indian law
Please sign. Please share.
Hard facts for a petition: Instagram, Meta and the harm to children
That moment for India is now.
— Saurabh Goswami
Want the full picture? Read on.
META KNEW. AND CHOSE TO DO NOTHING.
In 2019, Meta's own researchers produced an internal slide that stated: "We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls." That was not written by a journalist. It was written by Meta's own employees, in a document Meta tried to keep secret, later obtained and published by the Wall Street Journal in The Facebook Files investigation (September 2021).
The same internal research found that 32% of teen girls said Instagram made them feel worse about their bodies, and that among teens who reported suicidal thoughts, Instagram was identified as a contributing factor by 13% of British users and 6% of American users.
Former Meta product manager Frances Haugen testified under oath before the US Senate: "Facebook became a $1 trillion company by paying for its profits with our safety — including the safety of our children."
In January 2024, facing hundreds of families whose children had been harmed, Mark Zuckerberg stood before the US Senate, turned to the parents in the gallery, and said: "I'm sorry for everything you have all been through." Senator Lindsey Graham told him directly: "You have blood on your hands."
An apology is not accountability. Nothing has changed for India's children.
THE ALGORITHM PUSHES SEXUAL CONTENT TO YOUR CHILDREN
India is Instagram's single largest market — 362 million users, an estimated 8 crore of them minors.
The Wall Street Journal created a test account for a 13-year-old girl. Within minutes, the algorithm had filled her feed with sexualised body images and adult-oriented creators. She had searched for nothing. It came to her.
The Stanford Internet Observatory found the same, and worse. Researchers identified a network of over 500 accounts advertising child sexual abuse material on Instagram, with Instagram's own recommendation algorithm actively suggesting these accounts to new users under "Accounts You May Follow." When researchers found that Instagram displayed a popup reading "May contain images of child sex abuse" — users could click "view results anyway." This was allowed until Stanford's team forced its removal.
Independent researchers at 5Rights Foundation found that children were targeted with harmful content within 24 hours of creating an account — just 3 clicks separated a child searching "trampolining" from pro-anorexia content, and suicidal content appeared within 3 minutes.
A 2025 independent audit of Instagram's own "Teen Accounts" feature — Meta's promoted child-safety solution — found that across five test accounts, 100% were recommended sexual content, and 80% were recommended body-image and disordered-eating content.
The "Sensitive Content Control" meant to protect minors? Off by default. Age verification? A date-of-birth box any child can fake. Unsealed court documents revealed Meta received over 1.1 million reports of users under 13 on Instagram between 2019 and 2023, and that Meta had known approximately 4 million children under 13 were on Instagram as far back as 2015.
THE PLATFORM IS RECRUITING CHILDREN TO CREATE THIS CONTENT
This is what I find most disturbing — and what most people don't yet see.
Instagram is not only exposing children to harmful content. It is engineering children into producing it.
Instagram's Trial Reels feature sends a creator's video beyond their followers to millions of strangers via Instagram's recommendation algorithm. A school child who posts a Trial Reel is broadcasting to unknown adults, with no understanding of what they are agreeing to.
When a child posts something mildly suggestive — a certain pose, a certain dance — the algorithm rewards it with views, likes, and new followers. In school, this becomes social currency. So the child does it again. A little further. The algorithm rewards them again. No one on the platform says stop.
Arturo Béjar, a former Meta Director of Protect and Care who built child-safety tools inside Instagram, testified before the US Senate in 2023 and said: "Instagram itself becomes the groomer." His own internal surveys found that 13% of teens aged 13–15 had received unwanted sexual advances on Instagram in the prior week alone.
In the UK, the Molly Russell inquest made history as the first legal proceeding to directly attribute a child's death partly to Instagram. The coroner found that in the six months before 14-year-old Molly died, Instagram had pushed 34 specific "depressive accounts" directly to her feed, and she had engaged with over 2,100 posts related to self-harm and suicide.
In India, the Bois Locker Room case in 2020 — where Delhi schoolboys used Instagram to share obscene images of minor girls — triggered formal NCPCR notices to the platform. The NCPCR Chairperson stated publicly: "Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube are not safe for children." Trial in that case has still not commenced.
Five years later.
META EARNS BILLIONS FROM THIS — INCLUDING FROM YOUR CHILD
This is not negligence. This is a business model.
A Harvard School of Public Health study published in PLOS ONE found that Instagram alone earned approximately $4.8 billion in advertising revenue from users aged 17 and under in the United States in a single year — 2022. The lead researcher concluded: "They have overwhelming financial incentives to continue to delay taking meaningful steps to protect children."
Instagram Subscriptions let creators charge up to $99.99 per month for exclusive content — Meta takes a cut, with no meaningful age check on who pays. Creator Bonuses paid creators based on view counts — and since sexualised content gets more views, Meta was directly paying for its creation. Advertising runs next to all of this content; the more your child watches, the more Meta earns.
Internally, Meta described children as "a valuable but untapped audience," noting that 11-year-olds are "four times as likely to keep coming back to Instagram" compared to other apps. In March 2026, a New Mexico jury found Meta liable and ordered it to pay $375 million for failing to protect young users from predators on Instagram.
THE WORLD IS ACTING. INDIA IS NOT.
European Union: Formal proceedings opened against Meta in 2024. Preliminary findings in April 2026 concluded Meta was in breach of the Digital
Services Act. Potential fine: 6% of global revenue — approximately $8.5 billion. Ireland had already fined Instagram €405 million in 2022.
United States: A bipartisan coalition of 42 state Attorneys General filed lawsuits against Meta in October 2023. The federal judge refused to dismiss, finding Meta's "yearslong public campaign of deception as to the risks of addiction and mental harms to minors" adequately pleaded.
Australia: In November 2024, Australia became the first country to ban children under 16 from social media, with fines of up to AUD $49.5 million for violations.
India: Nothing.
Our own NCPCR has raised alarms.
Our Economic Survey 2025–26 flagged social media addiction among young Indians as a public health concern. The Union IT Minister told Parliament in November 2024 that laws need to be stricter.
A Parliamentary Standing Committee in April 2026 urged age-based social media restrictions.
India has laws that already cover this — the IT Act 2000, IT Rules 2021, POCSO 2012, and the DPDP Act 2023. The Supreme Court ruled in September 2024 that platforms cannot claim Section 79 IT Act safe harbour if they fail their POCSO obligations to Indian police.
Meta is not above Indian law. MeitY needs to act like it.
YOUR SIGNATURE MATTERS
"We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls"
→ https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls-company-documents-show-11631620739
Frances Haugen Senate testimony
→ https://www.commerce.senate.gov/services/files/FC8A558E-824E-4914-BEDB-3A7B1190BD49
Zuckerberg apology
→ https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/mark-zuckerberg-apologizes-parents-online-child-safety-hearing-rcna136578
WSJ 13-year-old test account
→ https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls-company-documents-show-11631620739
Stanford SIO CSAM report
→ https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/news/addressing-distribution-illicit-sexual-content-minors-online
5Rights Foundation — content within 24 hours
→ https://5rightsfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Pathways-how-digital-design-puts-children-at-risk.pdf
100% of Teen Accounts shown sexual content (Accountable Tech 2025)
→ https://accountabletech.org/statements/report-instagram-teen-accounts-recommend-body-shaming-hateful-and-sexual-content-to-young-users/
4 million under-13s / unsealed court documents
→ https://time.com/7336204/meta-lawsuit-files-child-safety/
Trial Reels feature
→ https://creators.instagram.com/blog/instagram-trial-reels
"Instagram itself becomes the groomer" — Arturo Béjar
→ https://www.techpolicy.press/evaluating-instagrams-promises-to-protect-teens/
Molly Russell inquest
→ https://mollyrosefoundation.org/mollys-inquest/
NCPCR Bois Locker Room notice to Instagram
→ https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/english/republic+tv+english-epaper-repubeng/issuing+notice+to+instagram+have+gone+to+police+ncpcr+chief+on+bois+locker+room+group-newsid-n182644858
Instagram subscriptions launch
→ https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/19/instagram-launches-early-test-of-creator-subscriptions-in-the-u-s/
Creator bonuses (Reels Play Bonus)
→ https://techcrunch.com/2021/11/11/instagram-bonuses-reels-tiktok/
$228 million from eating-disorder bubble (Fairplay)
→ https://fairplayforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/designing_for_disorder.pdf
"Tweens as untapped audience" / 11-year-olds 4x more likely (NPR/trial)
→ https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5746125/meta-youtube-social-media-trial-verdict
Harvard — $4.8 billion from minors (PBS)
→ https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/social-media-companies-made-11-billion-in-u-s-ad-revenue-from-minors-harvard-study-finds
$375 million New Mexico jury verdict
→ https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5746125/meta-youtube-social-media-trial-verdict
EU DSA proceedings / preliminary findings
→ https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-preliminarily-finds-meta-breach-digital-services-act-failing-prevent-minors-under-13
Instagram €405 million fine (EDPB)
→ https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2022/record-fine-instagram-following-edpb-intervention_en
42 state AGs lawsuit
→ https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2023/attorney-general-james-and-multistate-coalition-sue-meta-harming-youth
Australia social media age ban
→ https://www.pm.gov.au/media/social-media-reforms-protect-our-kids-online-pass-parliament
UK Online Safety Act (Ofcom)
→ https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation
India Economic Survey flagging digital addiction
→ https://www.theweek.in/news/health/2026/02/10/economic-survey-2025-26-flags-rising-obesity-diabetes-and-digital-addiction-in-india.html
IT Minister Vaishnaw on stricter laws
→ https://www.business-standard.com/technology/tech-news/need-to-make-laws-more-strict-to-curb-vulgarity-on-social-media-vaishnaw-124112700819_1.html
Parliamentary Committee on age restrictions (April 2026)
→ https://www.medianama.com/2026/04/223-parliamentary-committee-calls-comprehensive-ai-law-age-based-restrictions-social-media-platforms/
Supreme Court India — S. Harish judgment on Section 79 / POCSO
→ https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/09/23/storing-watching-child-pornography-crime-supreme-court-pocso-it-act/
24
The Issue
My name is Saurabh Goswami.
I am one person. I have no institutional power behind this. What I have is the evidence, a six-month-old niece, and the conviction that when enough people say enough, things change.
A signature here tells Meta that India's 362 million users are not passive consumers of whatever it engineers into our children's lives. It tells MeitY that citizens expect the laws of this country to apply to a corporation headquartered in California.
- Instagram is doing deliberate, documented, admitted harm to children and profiting from it. India is its largest market. Our regulators have done nothing.
- Meta's own internal research stated: "We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls."
They tried to hide it. The Wall Street Journal published it anyway. - A test account created for a 13-year-old girl received sexualised content within minutes of opening Instagram without searching for anything. Stanford University found Instagram's algorithm was actively recommending accounts selling child sexual abuse material to new users.
- An independent 2025 audit of Instagram's own Teen Accounts safety feature found that 100% of test accounts were recommended sexual content. Instagram earns money from every view.
- A Harvard study found Instagram alone made $4.8 billion in a single year from users aged 17 and under. Children are not just being exposed to this content.
- The platform is engineering them to create it by rewarding mildly suggestive posts with views, likes, and followers, turning sexual performance into school-level social currency.
- 42 US states have sued Meta. The EU has fined Instagram €405 million and opened further proceedings. Australia has banned under-16s from social media entirely.
- India with 362 million Instagram users has done NOTHING!.
What we are asking for:
- Real age verification — not a date-of-birth checkbox
- Independent public audit of Instagram's recommendation algorithm in India
- No monetisation of sexually suggestive content — no bonuses, no subscriptions for it
- Trial Reels and viral amplification off by default for all minor accounts
- Monthly transparency reports on what Indian minor users are being shown
- MeitY to enforce laws that already exist — Meta is not above Indian law
Please sign. Please share.
Hard facts for a petition: Instagram, Meta and the harm to children
That moment for India is now.
— Saurabh Goswami
Want the full picture? Read on.
META KNEW. AND CHOSE TO DO NOTHING.
In 2019, Meta's own researchers produced an internal slide that stated: "We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls." That was not written by a journalist. It was written by Meta's own employees, in a document Meta tried to keep secret, later obtained and published by the Wall Street Journal in The Facebook Files investigation (September 2021).
The same internal research found that 32% of teen girls said Instagram made them feel worse about their bodies, and that among teens who reported suicidal thoughts, Instagram was identified as a contributing factor by 13% of British users and 6% of American users.
Former Meta product manager Frances Haugen testified under oath before the US Senate: "Facebook became a $1 trillion company by paying for its profits with our safety — including the safety of our children."
In January 2024, facing hundreds of families whose children had been harmed, Mark Zuckerberg stood before the US Senate, turned to the parents in the gallery, and said: "I'm sorry for everything you have all been through." Senator Lindsey Graham told him directly: "You have blood on your hands."
An apology is not accountability. Nothing has changed for India's children.
THE ALGORITHM PUSHES SEXUAL CONTENT TO YOUR CHILDREN
India is Instagram's single largest market — 362 million users, an estimated 8 crore of them minors.
The Wall Street Journal created a test account for a 13-year-old girl. Within minutes, the algorithm had filled her feed with sexualised body images and adult-oriented creators. She had searched for nothing. It came to her.
The Stanford Internet Observatory found the same, and worse. Researchers identified a network of over 500 accounts advertising child sexual abuse material on Instagram, with Instagram's own recommendation algorithm actively suggesting these accounts to new users under "Accounts You May Follow." When researchers found that Instagram displayed a popup reading "May contain images of child sex abuse" — users could click "view results anyway." This was allowed until Stanford's team forced its removal.
Independent researchers at 5Rights Foundation found that children were targeted with harmful content within 24 hours of creating an account — just 3 clicks separated a child searching "trampolining" from pro-anorexia content, and suicidal content appeared within 3 minutes.
A 2025 independent audit of Instagram's own "Teen Accounts" feature — Meta's promoted child-safety solution — found that across five test accounts, 100% were recommended sexual content, and 80% were recommended body-image and disordered-eating content.
The "Sensitive Content Control" meant to protect minors? Off by default. Age verification? A date-of-birth box any child can fake. Unsealed court documents revealed Meta received over 1.1 million reports of users under 13 on Instagram between 2019 and 2023, and that Meta had known approximately 4 million children under 13 were on Instagram as far back as 2015.
THE PLATFORM IS RECRUITING CHILDREN TO CREATE THIS CONTENT
This is what I find most disturbing — and what most people don't yet see.
Instagram is not only exposing children to harmful content. It is engineering children into producing it.
Instagram's Trial Reels feature sends a creator's video beyond their followers to millions of strangers via Instagram's recommendation algorithm. A school child who posts a Trial Reel is broadcasting to unknown adults, with no understanding of what they are agreeing to.
When a child posts something mildly suggestive — a certain pose, a certain dance — the algorithm rewards it with views, likes, and new followers. In school, this becomes social currency. So the child does it again. A little further. The algorithm rewards them again. No one on the platform says stop.
Arturo Béjar, a former Meta Director of Protect and Care who built child-safety tools inside Instagram, testified before the US Senate in 2023 and said: "Instagram itself becomes the groomer." His own internal surveys found that 13% of teens aged 13–15 had received unwanted sexual advances on Instagram in the prior week alone.
In the UK, the Molly Russell inquest made history as the first legal proceeding to directly attribute a child's death partly to Instagram. The coroner found that in the six months before 14-year-old Molly died, Instagram had pushed 34 specific "depressive accounts" directly to her feed, and she had engaged with over 2,100 posts related to self-harm and suicide.
In India, the Bois Locker Room case in 2020 — where Delhi schoolboys used Instagram to share obscene images of minor girls — triggered formal NCPCR notices to the platform. The NCPCR Chairperson stated publicly: "Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube are not safe for children." Trial in that case has still not commenced.
Five years later.
META EARNS BILLIONS FROM THIS — INCLUDING FROM YOUR CHILD
This is not negligence. This is a business model.
A Harvard School of Public Health study published in PLOS ONE found that Instagram alone earned approximately $4.8 billion in advertising revenue from users aged 17 and under in the United States in a single year — 2022. The lead researcher concluded: "They have overwhelming financial incentives to continue to delay taking meaningful steps to protect children."
Instagram Subscriptions let creators charge up to $99.99 per month for exclusive content — Meta takes a cut, with no meaningful age check on who pays. Creator Bonuses paid creators based on view counts — and since sexualised content gets more views, Meta was directly paying for its creation. Advertising runs next to all of this content; the more your child watches, the more Meta earns.
Internally, Meta described children as "a valuable but untapped audience," noting that 11-year-olds are "four times as likely to keep coming back to Instagram" compared to other apps. In March 2026, a New Mexico jury found Meta liable and ordered it to pay $375 million for failing to protect young users from predators on Instagram.
THE WORLD IS ACTING. INDIA IS NOT.
European Union: Formal proceedings opened against Meta in 2024. Preliminary findings in April 2026 concluded Meta was in breach of the Digital
Services Act. Potential fine: 6% of global revenue — approximately $8.5 billion. Ireland had already fined Instagram €405 million in 2022.
United States: A bipartisan coalition of 42 state Attorneys General filed lawsuits against Meta in October 2023. The federal judge refused to dismiss, finding Meta's "yearslong public campaign of deception as to the risks of addiction and mental harms to minors" adequately pleaded.
Australia: In November 2024, Australia became the first country to ban children under 16 from social media, with fines of up to AUD $49.5 million for violations.
India: Nothing.
Our own NCPCR has raised alarms.
Our Economic Survey 2025–26 flagged social media addiction among young Indians as a public health concern. The Union IT Minister told Parliament in November 2024 that laws need to be stricter.
A Parliamentary Standing Committee in April 2026 urged age-based social media restrictions.
India has laws that already cover this — the IT Act 2000, IT Rules 2021, POCSO 2012, and the DPDP Act 2023. The Supreme Court ruled in September 2024 that platforms cannot claim Section 79 IT Act safe harbour if they fail their POCSO obligations to Indian police.
Meta is not above Indian law. MeitY needs to act like it.
YOUR SIGNATURE MATTERS
"We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls"
→ https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls-company-documents-show-11631620739
Frances Haugen Senate testimony
→ https://www.commerce.senate.gov/services/files/FC8A558E-824E-4914-BEDB-3A7B1190BD49
Zuckerberg apology
→ https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/mark-zuckerberg-apologizes-parents-online-child-safety-hearing-rcna136578
WSJ 13-year-old test account
→ https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls-company-documents-show-11631620739
Stanford SIO CSAM report
→ https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/news/addressing-distribution-illicit-sexual-content-minors-online
5Rights Foundation — content within 24 hours
→ https://5rightsfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Pathways-how-digital-design-puts-children-at-risk.pdf
100% of Teen Accounts shown sexual content (Accountable Tech 2025)
→ https://accountabletech.org/statements/report-instagram-teen-accounts-recommend-body-shaming-hateful-and-sexual-content-to-young-users/
4 million under-13s / unsealed court documents
→ https://time.com/7336204/meta-lawsuit-files-child-safety/
Trial Reels feature
→ https://creators.instagram.com/blog/instagram-trial-reels
"Instagram itself becomes the groomer" — Arturo Béjar
→ https://www.techpolicy.press/evaluating-instagrams-promises-to-protect-teens/
Molly Russell inquest
→ https://mollyrosefoundation.org/mollys-inquest/
NCPCR Bois Locker Room notice to Instagram
→ https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/english/republic+tv+english-epaper-repubeng/issuing+notice+to+instagram+have+gone+to+police+ncpcr+chief+on+bois+locker+room+group-newsid-n182644858
Instagram subscriptions launch
→ https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/19/instagram-launches-early-test-of-creator-subscriptions-in-the-u-s/
Creator bonuses (Reels Play Bonus)
→ https://techcrunch.com/2021/11/11/instagram-bonuses-reels-tiktok/
$228 million from eating-disorder bubble (Fairplay)
→ https://fairplayforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/designing_for_disorder.pdf
"Tweens as untapped audience" / 11-year-olds 4x more likely (NPR/trial)
→ https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5746125/meta-youtube-social-media-trial-verdict
Harvard — $4.8 billion from minors (PBS)
→ https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/social-media-companies-made-11-billion-in-u-s-ad-revenue-from-minors-harvard-study-finds
$375 million New Mexico jury verdict
→ https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5746125/meta-youtube-social-media-trial-verdict
EU DSA proceedings / preliminary findings
→ https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-preliminarily-finds-meta-breach-digital-services-act-failing-prevent-minors-under-13
Instagram €405 million fine (EDPB)
→ https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2022/record-fine-instagram-following-edpb-intervention_en
42 state AGs lawsuit
→ https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2023/attorney-general-james-and-multistate-coalition-sue-meta-harming-youth
Australia social media age ban
→ https://www.pm.gov.au/media/social-media-reforms-protect-our-kids-online-pass-parliament
UK Online Safety Act (Ofcom)
→ https://www.ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/illegal-and-harmful-content/roadmap-to-regulation
India Economic Survey flagging digital addiction
→ https://www.theweek.in/news/health/2026/02/10/economic-survey-2025-26-flags-rising-obesity-diabetes-and-digital-addiction-in-india.html
IT Minister Vaishnaw on stricter laws
→ https://www.business-standard.com/technology/tech-news/need-to-make-laws-more-strict-to-curb-vulgarity-on-social-media-vaishnaw-124112700819_1.html
Parliamentary Committee on age restrictions (April 2026)
→ https://www.medianama.com/2026/04/223-parliamentary-committee-calls-comprehensive-ai-law-age-based-restrictions-social-media-platforms/
Supreme Court India — S. Harish judgment on Section 79 / POCSO
→ https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/09/23/storing-watching-child-pornography-crime-supreme-court-pocso-it-act/
24
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 14 May 2026