Did you know that your California public library could be taken over by a private company? The good news is that there's a bill (AB 438) in the California Senate that will help protect libraries from reckless privatization schemes.
In Southern California, public libraries are being targeted for takeover by Library Systems & Services, Inc. (LSSI), a private company headquartered in Maryland and majority-owned by the private equity firm Islington Capital Partners. LSSI currently operates 14 library systems and is eyeing more in California. Last year in Santa Clarita, California, residents were allowed just one public hearing before the City Council rushed through a vote to hand over the city's library system to LSSI. Your library could be next.
When municipalities contract with private library service providers like LSSI, it often results in diminished library services and hidden costs to taxpayers. In Santa Clarita, for example, LSSI charges taxpayers a 5% fee for every new book purchased. Concerns arise over transparency and accountability, too. When public libraries are privatized, information that was once public - for example, library staff salaries - becomes proprietary information. The company is also granted access to patron records (e.g. your borrowing history).
So, what's in the bill? The proposed legislation will require local officials to give their constituents adequate notice of plans to privatize and to demonstrate that privatization will benefti the community.
AB 438 - which was passed in the California State Assembly in June and is now headed to the State Senate for a vote - stipulates that a city or library district that intends to employ a private contractor to operate the city's or the district's library shall require 1) a fair cost analysis, 2) proven savings to the taxpayers, 3) competitive bidding, 4) proven qualifications of the contractor, 5) doesn't displace employees, and 6) performance and financial audits are conducted.
If we're going to stop the privatization of public libraries, we need to start by requiring cities and towns to responsibly puruse these plans. After signing the petition, visit privatizationbeast.org to learn more.
This bill will give taxpayers the information they need to support or oppose library privatization efforts. AB 438 requires that a city or library district that intends to employ a private contractor to operate a library shall require 1) a fair cost analysis, 2) proven savings to the taxpayers, 3) competitive bidding, 4) proven qualifications of the contractor, 5) doesn't displace employees, and 6) performance and financial audits are conducted.
Public libraries should not be operated for private profit, and I'm concerned with the rash of privatization schemes in Southern California and beyond. Libraries are at the heart of our communities. It's an essential public service that impacts everyone from children to seniors.
If a local government seeks to privatize their libraries, the burden of proof should fall to them - not the taxpayers. This bill would correctly place the burden of proof in altering one of the most essential public services on those advocating the issue.