Stop transportation companies from governing trucks below the speed limit

Stop transportation companies from governing trucks below the speed limit

The Issue

I am deeply concerned about the use of speed governors by transportation companies, a technology that, instead of enhancing road safety, has inadvertently contributed to numerous road accidents. Having witnessed countless incidents where vehicles moving slower than the posted speed limits become hazards on the road, I believe it is crucial that we address this issue immediately.

Speed governors are devices installed in vehicles to restrict speed to a set limit. While their intention is to prevent speeding and enhance safety, they often lead to unpredictably slow-moving vehicles on highways and roads. This unexpected reduction in speed can cause frustration among other drivers, leading them to make rash decisions, including sudden lane changes and attempts to overtake in unsafe conditions—both of which significantly increase the risk of accidents.

Furthermore, these commercial vehicles feature an 'E-Coast' function that shifts the truck into a neutral state when coasting downhill. Although coasting on any grade is prohibited in several states due to safety concerns, the Department of Transportation does not actively enforce this regulation. This neutral coasting feature causes speed fluctuations, deviating from the driver-set cruise control speed, which may surprise other motorists who could become impatient and attempt to pass the commercial vehicle.

While experienced truck drivers know how to manage their vehicle's weight downhill, others might allow excessive momentum to build up, potentially exceeding speed limits and endangering other road users, particularly if the commercial vehicle's brakes fail. Transportation companies primarily utilize this feature to reduce fuel consumption, albeit at the expense of motorist safety.

According to a study by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, speed differentials on highways significantly contribute to accidents. When vehicles travel substantially slower than surrounding traffic, the likelihood of collisions increases by almost 15%. The data clearly shows that speed governors, by enforcing an artificial speed cap, disrupt the natural flow of traffic and create bottleneck conditions, inadvertently making roads less safe.

Moreover, in regions where traffic is heavy, the presence of singular slower-moving vehicles becomes even more dangerous. Other drivers, in their attempt to maintain a steady flow, often misjudge distances and speeds, resulting in preventable accidents.

We propose a practical solution: Rather than enforcing blanket speed restrictions, transportation companies should rely on improved driver training programs focused on road safety best practices and situational awareness. Moreover, they can invest in advanced telematics systems that offer real-time data to drivers, alerting them about speed limits and road conditions, thus allowing for a more dynamic driving approach that acknowledges real-world traffic conditions.

Addressing the misuse of speed governors is not just about enhancing road safety; it is about ensuring the safety and wellbeing of all road users. I urge you to join me in calling for a review of current policies surrounding speed governors and to advocate for alternative solutions that better serve our community. By signing this petition, you support a future where road safety is prioritized through smart and effective measures. Please lend your voice to this cause – sign the petition now.

avatar of the starter
J SPetition Starter

2

The Issue

I am deeply concerned about the use of speed governors by transportation companies, a technology that, instead of enhancing road safety, has inadvertently contributed to numerous road accidents. Having witnessed countless incidents where vehicles moving slower than the posted speed limits become hazards on the road, I believe it is crucial that we address this issue immediately.

Speed governors are devices installed in vehicles to restrict speed to a set limit. While their intention is to prevent speeding and enhance safety, they often lead to unpredictably slow-moving vehicles on highways and roads. This unexpected reduction in speed can cause frustration among other drivers, leading them to make rash decisions, including sudden lane changes and attempts to overtake in unsafe conditions—both of which significantly increase the risk of accidents.

Furthermore, these commercial vehicles feature an 'E-Coast' function that shifts the truck into a neutral state when coasting downhill. Although coasting on any grade is prohibited in several states due to safety concerns, the Department of Transportation does not actively enforce this regulation. This neutral coasting feature causes speed fluctuations, deviating from the driver-set cruise control speed, which may surprise other motorists who could become impatient and attempt to pass the commercial vehicle.

While experienced truck drivers know how to manage their vehicle's weight downhill, others might allow excessive momentum to build up, potentially exceeding speed limits and endangering other road users, particularly if the commercial vehicle's brakes fail. Transportation companies primarily utilize this feature to reduce fuel consumption, albeit at the expense of motorist safety.

According to a study by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, speed differentials on highways significantly contribute to accidents. When vehicles travel substantially slower than surrounding traffic, the likelihood of collisions increases by almost 15%. The data clearly shows that speed governors, by enforcing an artificial speed cap, disrupt the natural flow of traffic and create bottleneck conditions, inadvertently making roads less safe.

Moreover, in regions where traffic is heavy, the presence of singular slower-moving vehicles becomes even more dangerous. Other drivers, in their attempt to maintain a steady flow, often misjudge distances and speeds, resulting in preventable accidents.

We propose a practical solution: Rather than enforcing blanket speed restrictions, transportation companies should rely on improved driver training programs focused on road safety best practices and situational awareness. Moreover, they can invest in advanced telematics systems that offer real-time data to drivers, alerting them about speed limits and road conditions, thus allowing for a more dynamic driving approach that acknowledges real-world traffic conditions.

Addressing the misuse of speed governors is not just about enhancing road safety; it is about ensuring the safety and wellbeing of all road users. I urge you to join me in calling for a review of current policies surrounding speed governors and to advocate for alternative solutions that better serve our community. By signing this petition, you support a future where road safety is prioritized through smart and effective measures. Please lend your voice to this cause – sign the petition now.

avatar of the starter
J SPetition Starter

Petition Updates