Stop the Southampton Land Disturbance Ordinance (RES-2026-0324) — Demand Revisions Before
Stop the Southampton Land Disturbance Ordinance (RES-2026-0324) — Demand Revisions Before
The Issue
We, the undersigned residents, property owners, and stakeholders of the Town of Southampton, urge the Town Board to pause and reconsider the proposed Land Disturbance Ordinance (Article XIIIA of Chapter 330) before moving forward.
While we support responsible environmental stewardship, this proposal raises serious concerns about overreach, cost burdens, and unintended consequences for homeowners and businesses.
Key Concerns:
1. Overly Broad and Burdensome Regulation
The ordinance applies to relatively small levels of land disturbance (as little as 800 sq. ft. on residential properties), which could impact routine property improvements. This creates unnecessary barriers for homeowners simply trying to maintain or modestly improve their land.
2. Increased Costs and Delays
Requiring permits, site plans, potential professional reports, and approvals introduces significant new costs, delays, and administrative hurdles—especially for middle-class homeowners—not just large developers.
3. Vague and Subjective Standards
Terms such as “maximum extent practicable” and discretionary review by Town officials create uncertainty and inconsistency in how permits will be approved or denied.
4. Excessive Penalties
Fines of up to $3,000 per day and potential criminal charges are disproportionate and could unfairly penalize residents for unintentional violations.
5. Property Rights Concerns
The ordinance restricts how property owners can use and maintain their own land, even when activities have minimal environmental impact.
6. Redundant Regulation Already Covered by Existing Laws
At the March 24, 2026 public hearing, Southampton-based attorney John Bennett presented a detailed statement into the record explaining that existing Town codes and environmental regulations already address many of the concerns this ordinance seeks to regulate, making this proposal duplicative and unnecessary.
7. Lack of Clear Balance
While environmental protection is important, this law does not adequately balance those goals with practical property use, affordability, and fairness.
We Call On the Town Board To:
Delay adoption of this ordinance
Engage with residents and stakeholders for meaningful input
Clarify vague provisions and reduce subjectivity
Raise thresholds for permit requirements
Simplify the process for routine maintenance and landscaping
Avoid duplicative regulation where existing laws already apply
Reconsider excessive penalties
Southampton deserves thoughtful, balanced policy—not rushed legislation that places undue burden on its residents.
Sign this petition to protect homeowners, ensure fairness, and demand a better approach.

42
The Issue
We, the undersigned residents, property owners, and stakeholders of the Town of Southampton, urge the Town Board to pause and reconsider the proposed Land Disturbance Ordinance (Article XIIIA of Chapter 330) before moving forward.
While we support responsible environmental stewardship, this proposal raises serious concerns about overreach, cost burdens, and unintended consequences for homeowners and businesses.
Key Concerns:
1. Overly Broad and Burdensome Regulation
The ordinance applies to relatively small levels of land disturbance (as little as 800 sq. ft. on residential properties), which could impact routine property improvements. This creates unnecessary barriers for homeowners simply trying to maintain or modestly improve their land.
2. Increased Costs and Delays
Requiring permits, site plans, potential professional reports, and approvals introduces significant new costs, delays, and administrative hurdles—especially for middle-class homeowners—not just large developers.
3. Vague and Subjective Standards
Terms such as “maximum extent practicable” and discretionary review by Town officials create uncertainty and inconsistency in how permits will be approved or denied.
4. Excessive Penalties
Fines of up to $3,000 per day and potential criminal charges are disproportionate and could unfairly penalize residents for unintentional violations.
5. Property Rights Concerns
The ordinance restricts how property owners can use and maintain their own land, even when activities have minimal environmental impact.
6. Redundant Regulation Already Covered by Existing Laws
At the March 24, 2026 public hearing, Southampton-based attorney John Bennett presented a detailed statement into the record explaining that existing Town codes and environmental regulations already address many of the concerns this ordinance seeks to regulate, making this proposal duplicative and unnecessary.
7. Lack of Clear Balance
While environmental protection is important, this law does not adequately balance those goals with practical property use, affordability, and fairness.
We Call On the Town Board To:
Delay adoption of this ordinance
Engage with residents and stakeholders for meaningful input
Clarify vague provisions and reduce subjectivity
Raise thresholds for permit requirements
Simplify the process for routine maintenance and landscaping
Avoid duplicative regulation where existing laws already apply
Reconsider excessive penalties
Southampton deserves thoughtful, balanced policy—not rushed legislation that places undue burden on its residents.
Sign this petition to protect homeowners, ensure fairness, and demand a better approach.

42
The Decision Makers

Supporter Voices
Petition created on March 25, 2026