Stop the Gas Blower Ban in Stamford, CT

Recent signers:
Dante Calabrese and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Petition to Oppose the Gas Leaf Blower Ban in Stamford, CT


Presented by a Concerned Community Representative. Timothy McGrath 

As someone dedicated to both environmental stewardship and economic fairness, I ask Stamford leaders to reconsider the proposed ban on gas-powered leaf blowers. While the goal, to reduce emissions and noise, is commendable, this approach places a heavy burden on small local landscaping businesses without offering viable support.

 
Local Economic Snapshot

Stamford is home to roughly 113 landscaping contractors. Most are small, owner-operated businesses crucial to our community’s economic fabric. 


Across Connecticut, 2,662 landscapers operate, more than 89% are solo or small operations.
 
Real Financial & Operational Pain Points


1. Severe Upfront Costs
Electric blowers cost 3–4× more than gas alternatives, often exceeding $2,500 per unit.
Full-day crews need 8–12 batteries per blower, plus charging gear, piling up thousands in costs and logistical headaches. 


2. Infrastructure Overhaul
Businesses would need to retrofit vehicles and trailers with chargers, domestic grids and mobile units alike, incurring tens of thousands in expense.


3. Efficiency and Reliability Gaps
Electric blowers often lack runtime and power compared to gas models. Many landscapers report frequent mid-job interruptions and weight-related fatigue. When tools fall short, the real loss is in productivity and reliability.


4. Cost-Passing to Homeowners
Some customers report price doubling due to the transition burden, from both materials and labor adjustments. In high-cost-of-living areas like Stamford, homeowners feel every price increase keenly. 
 
Change Should Be Driven by Incentives, Not Force


If electric tools were more effective and affordable, we’d adopt them voluntarily. Instead of mandates, we need proactive support:

Rebates and grants for electric equipment (consumer and business)
Infrastructure support for on-site charging station setups
Pilot programs and training to validate performance under local conditions
Evidence shows these approaches work, places with rebate programs see higher adoption and participation in cleaner equipment without forcing businesses into unsustainable transitions.

 
Summary: Protect Small Businesses & Promote Smarter Transition
113 local landscaping businesses could be harmed by this ban
High-cost mandates create a competitive disadvantage for small operators
Inequitable economic impact in a city known for high cost of living and commercial rents.


We stand for sustainability, yes, but responsible and equitable transition matters. Please support Stamford’s small businesses by opposing the proposed gas leaf blower ban. Better, smarter solutions exist, let’s invest in those, together.

 

248

Recent signers:
Dante Calabrese and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Petition to Oppose the Gas Leaf Blower Ban in Stamford, CT


Presented by a Concerned Community Representative. Timothy McGrath 

As someone dedicated to both environmental stewardship and economic fairness, I ask Stamford leaders to reconsider the proposed ban on gas-powered leaf blowers. While the goal, to reduce emissions and noise, is commendable, this approach places a heavy burden on small local landscaping businesses without offering viable support.

 
Local Economic Snapshot

Stamford is home to roughly 113 landscaping contractors. Most are small, owner-operated businesses crucial to our community’s economic fabric. 


Across Connecticut, 2,662 landscapers operate, more than 89% are solo or small operations.
 
Real Financial & Operational Pain Points


1. Severe Upfront Costs
Electric blowers cost 3–4× more than gas alternatives, often exceeding $2,500 per unit.
Full-day crews need 8–12 batteries per blower, plus charging gear, piling up thousands in costs and logistical headaches. 


2. Infrastructure Overhaul
Businesses would need to retrofit vehicles and trailers with chargers, domestic grids and mobile units alike, incurring tens of thousands in expense.


3. Efficiency and Reliability Gaps
Electric blowers often lack runtime and power compared to gas models. Many landscapers report frequent mid-job interruptions and weight-related fatigue. When tools fall short, the real loss is in productivity and reliability.


4. Cost-Passing to Homeowners
Some customers report price doubling due to the transition burden, from both materials and labor adjustments. In high-cost-of-living areas like Stamford, homeowners feel every price increase keenly. 
 
Change Should Be Driven by Incentives, Not Force


If electric tools were more effective and affordable, we’d adopt them voluntarily. Instead of mandates, we need proactive support:

Rebates and grants for electric equipment (consumer and business)
Infrastructure support for on-site charging station setups
Pilot programs and training to validate performance under local conditions
Evidence shows these approaches work, places with rebate programs see higher adoption and participation in cleaner equipment without forcing businesses into unsustainable transitions.

 
Summary: Protect Small Businesses & Promote Smarter Transition
113 local landscaping businesses could be harmed by this ban
High-cost mandates create a competitive disadvantage for small operators
Inequitable economic impact in a city known for high cost of living and commercial rents.


We stand for sustainability, yes, but responsible and equitable transition matters. Please support Stamford’s small businesses by opposing the proposed gas leaf blower ban. Better, smarter solutions exist, let’s invest in those, together.

 

The Decision Makers

Bobby Pavia
Stamford City Council - District 17
Responded
Thank you for reaching out about the proposal to ban gas-powered leaf blowers in Stamford. I want to share my perspective and where the process stands today. At this time, I am not in favor of the gas blower ban. In my view, the City should take the lead in demonstrating alternatives before asking constituents and businesses to make such a change. Much of the concern driving this proposal has come from North Stamford, but the impacts would be citywide. The technology for battery-powered blowers is still in its early stages, and I don’t believe a ban is necessary right now. For example, charging a large fleet of blowers for properties spanning 100 acres would require diesel-powered trucks to recharge the batteries — which creates a double standard in terms of environmental impact. I believe it makes sense to wait for the technology to evolve before requiring residents and businesses to make this transition. This topic has been discussed in Stamford for about four years, and the Board of Representatives recently voted to hold a public hearing so all sides can be heard. That hearing will take place during the next board meeting on October 6, 2025. You can find details about the meeting and how to participate here: Board of Representatives – 2025 Meetings https://boardofreps.org/2025-meetings.aspx We never turn away public comment, and I encourage anyone with a perspective on this issue to share their views at the hearing. Respectfully, Rep. Bobby Pavia Board of Representatives (D-17)
David Watkins
Former Stamford City Council - District 1
Caroline Simmons
Stamford City Mayor
Lyda Ruijter
Former Stamford City Clerk

Supporter Voices

Petition updates
Share this petition
Petition created on September 5, 2025