Stop the AI data center in Mesa County

1,345

The Issue

Having lived in Grand Junction, Colorado, for many years, I've witnessed firsthand the serene beauty of our landscapes and the close-knit community spirit that defines our town. However, I've also observed the negative impacts that data centers have brought upon countless other towns and cities. Grand Junction is now facing a similar threat with the proposal of an AI data center. It's imperative that we act now to preserve our community and environment. Data centers are known for their massive consumption of resources. The proposed AI data center in Grand Junction threatens to significantly impact our local ecosystem. Data centers require enormous amounts of water for cooling purposes. Each year, they can use millions of gallons, which would be a tremendous drain on our resources, especially in an area already concerned with water conservation. Additionally, there's the constant noise produced by these facilities that disturbs local peace and quiet. Beyond environmental concerns, data centers rarely provide the economic benefits that are often promised. Many jobs associated with these centers require high levels of technical expertise and often bring in employees from outside the community. Grand Junction might see a soaring promise of jobs, yet, in truth, only a small fraction may be accessible to residents currently. It's crucial for us to consider the long-term implications. Look at other towns like Prineville, Oregon, and Quincy, Washington, where similar centers have contributed to escalating local issues. For instance, The New York Times reported significant noise pollution and unexpected strains on municipal resources, leaving communities with more problems than solutions. Our town’s heritage, natural beauty, and tranquility are at stake. Instead of allowing this AI data center to move forward unchecked, we should focus on encouraging sustainable investment that aligns with our community values and needs. This could include promoting green tech businesses or community-centered enterprise initiatives that genuinely benefit Grand Junction’s residents. I urge everyone who loves and respects our town to stand together in opposition to this proposal. Let's protect our precious resources and secure a future for Grand Junction that reflects our values and aspirations. Sign this petition to voice your concern, and let’s send a clear message that Grand Junction is not for sale to entities that do not consider the long-term wellbeing of our community.

The Decision Makers

The City of Grand Junction
The City of Grand Junction
Responded
At this time, the City of Grand Junction has no pending or known applications for a data center within city limits. The City is taking proactive steps on this issue and is already evaluating how data centers should be addressed under the City’s Land Use Code. Most recently, City Council gave staff direction to bring forward a one-year moratorium on new data center development. The intent is to give the City time to better understand potential impacts to resources such as water and electricity and determine what standards and review processes should be in place before an application comes forward. As the petition title references Mesa County, the City cannot speak on behalf of the County or to potential development outside Grand Junction city limits. What we can speak to are the steps we are taking within our own jurisdiction. Rather than waiting until a proposal is in front of us, we are taking the opportunity now to understand the potential impacts and make sure appropriate regulations are in place for Grand Junction. [Note: The Change.org Civic Engagement Team reaches out to decision makers to let them know about petitions in their community and to help facilitate engagement with supporters. The above was an email response we received regarding this petition.]
Grand Junction City Council
7 Members
Scott Beilfuss
Grand Junction City Council - At Large
Ben Van Dyke
Grand Junction City Council - At Large
Robert Ballard
Grand Junction City Council - District E

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates