Petition Closed

SIX KEY REASONS FOR STATES TO SAY NO TO EXCHANGES

There is no obligation to create an exchange. The federal law does not require the states to establish exchanges – now or ever. This is a costly federal mandate that the states have no obligation to fund. This is a federal law and the federal government should pay to fund it.

State exchanges will be state-funded, but not state-run. Under the health care law, the federal government will be in complete control of the exchange--from who can participate to what plans they can offer and prices they can charge. Estimates show it will cost upwards of $50 million annually to fund an exchange.

State exchanges will impose huge fines on small businesses. Under a state-funded exchange, businesses of 50 employees or more will be fined at least $2,000 per employee if they fail to offer comprehensive health insurance. If states say no to exchanges, there is no authority in the law for the federal government to impose these fines on businesses.

State exchanges will funnel millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies to insurance companies. States should not facilitate taxpayer subsidies to private companies. As with fines on businesses, there is no authority in the law for the federal government to offer subsidies if a state declines to establish an exchange.

State exchanges will force taxpayers to share private medical information with the government. States that create exchanges will report to the IRS sensitive information about citizens' health care choices, including when people seek, change or drop health insurance coverage. The government will also have access to medical history information of any person who buys insurance through the exchange.

There's no rush to create an exchange. The Department of Health and Human Services still has not released comprehensive guidelines instructing states about how to set up exchanges, and the federal health care law makes clear that states may wait and decide to set up state exchanges in future years. Federal start-up funds will be available to states until the end of 2014, no matter when they make a decision about setting up an exchange.

Letter to
Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney
Mississippi State House
Mississippi State Senate
and 1 other
Mississippi Governor
The Mississippi Insurance Department should immediately halt implementation of the insurance exchange being created under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as "Obamacare") and retract the current proposal submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In addition, the Insurance Department should cease expenditures to promote the exchange, which currently total over $645,000 with plans for a multi-million dollar advertising campaign funded with public money. Penalties on employers and unaffordable subsidies for insurance will only go into effect in states that create exchanges, and I believe Mississippi's best course of action is to refuse to implement an exchange.