Stop Foreign Control of Australia’s Health and Block the Digital ID

Recent signers:
Neal Renou and 19 others have signed recently.

The issue

 

 

We, the undersigned citizens of Australia, urgently call on the Federal Government to:

1. Reject any proposed treaty or agreement that hands over health emergency powers to the World Health Organization (WHO), World Economic Forum (WEF), or any other unelected foreign organization.

2. Oppose the implementation of a mandatory or centralised Digital ID system, which risks creating a surveillance-based society and eroding individual freedom, privacy, and autonomy.

Ensure that no changes to national health policy or digital infrastructure occur without full public consultation, transparency, and debate in Parliament.

Australia must remain a sovereign, free, and democratic nation. Our health, identity, and future must be protected from centralized global

 

 

They’re selling it as convenience and safety, but it’s a trap. Once you're locked into it, opting out becomes nearly impossible.

The UN's Sustainable Development Goals

 

The WEF’s “Great Reset”

 

Digital ID and CBDC proposals from central banks

 

What Digital ID Can Eventually Be Used For:

 

Control over access to food, healthcare, or travel

 

Mandated vaccines (if vaccinations aren't up to date your digital currency will be invalid, including social security payments)

Carbon score tracking

 

Linking your identity to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) — with programmable money (they can block what you buy)

 

Restricting dissent (if you speak out, your ID could be frozen)

 

 

 

 

Agenda 21/2030 policies aren’t usually rolled out by the UN directly — they’re adopted voluntarily by local councils, often in the form of:

 

Climate action plans

 

Building codes

 

Farming restrictions

 

Water use policies

 

Land buybacks

 

🔍 How Are They Getting Away With It?

 

1. They Redefine the Language

 

They rarely say, “We’re taking your land” or “You can’t grow food.”

Instead, they use terms like:

 

“Sustainable zoning”

 

“Land rewilding”

 

“Climate risk areas”

 

“Smart growth” or “urban densification”

 

“Protecting biodiversity”

 

So instead of sounding oppressive, it sounds responsible. But the outcome? You lose freedom and control over your land and food.

 control.

We demand that our elected leaders uphold the rights of the Australian people, not the interests of global corporations or unelected international bodies.

83

Recent signers:
Neal Renou and 19 others have signed recently.

The issue

 

 

We, the undersigned citizens of Australia, urgently call on the Federal Government to:

1. Reject any proposed treaty or agreement that hands over health emergency powers to the World Health Organization (WHO), World Economic Forum (WEF), or any other unelected foreign organization.

2. Oppose the implementation of a mandatory or centralised Digital ID system, which risks creating a surveillance-based society and eroding individual freedom, privacy, and autonomy.

Ensure that no changes to national health policy or digital infrastructure occur without full public consultation, transparency, and debate in Parliament.

Australia must remain a sovereign, free, and democratic nation. Our health, identity, and future must be protected from centralized global

 

 

They’re selling it as convenience and safety, but it’s a trap. Once you're locked into it, opting out becomes nearly impossible.

The UN's Sustainable Development Goals

 

The WEF’s “Great Reset”

 

Digital ID and CBDC proposals from central banks

 

What Digital ID Can Eventually Be Used For:

 

Control over access to food, healthcare, or travel

 

Mandated vaccines (if vaccinations aren't up to date your digital currency will be invalid, including social security payments)

Carbon score tracking

 

Linking your identity to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) — with programmable money (they can block what you buy)

 

Restricting dissent (if you speak out, your ID could be frozen)

 

 

 

 

Agenda 21/2030 policies aren’t usually rolled out by the UN directly — they’re adopted voluntarily by local councils, often in the form of:

 

Climate action plans

 

Building codes

 

Farming restrictions

 

Water use policies

 

Land buybacks

 

🔍 How Are They Getting Away With It?

 

1. They Redefine the Language

 

They rarely say, “We’re taking your land” or “You can’t grow food.”

Instead, they use terms like:

 

“Sustainable zoning”

 

“Land rewilding”

 

“Climate risk areas”

 

“Smart growth” or “urban densification”

 

“Protecting biodiversity”

 

So instead of sounding oppressive, it sounds responsible. But the outcome? You lose freedom and control over your land and food.

 control.

We demand that our elected leaders uphold the rights of the Australian people, not the interests of global corporations or unelected international bodies.

Supporter voices

Petition Updates