Victory
Petitioning New York Court of Appeals
This petition was delivered to:
New York Court of Appeals

STOP CHILD PORN FROM BEING LEGAL ON INTERNET

Viewing child pornography online isn't a crime, the New York Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday in the case of a college professor whose work computer was found to have stored more than a hundred illegal images in its Web cache.
Senior Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick wrote for a majority of four of the six judges. The court dismissed one of the counts of promoting a sexual performance of a child and one of the dozens of counts of possession of child pornography on which James D. Kent was convicted. The judge decided that this is voyeurism, but not child pornography. (WHAT??? NOT pornography??? These children (and women) were NOT willing participants!)
"Merely viewing Web images of child pornography does not, absent other proof, constitute either possession or procurement within the meaning of our Penal Law," Senior Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick wrote for a majority of four of the six judges. "Rather, some affirmative act is required (printing, saving, downloading, etc.) to show that defendant in fact exercised dominion and control over the images that were on his screen," Ciparick wrote. "To hold otherwise, would extend the reach of (state law) to conduct — viewing — that our Legislature has not deemed criminal."
Kent had a folder on his computer that stored about 13,000 saved images of girls whom investigators estimated to be 8 or 9 years old!
PLEASE sign this and share this with everybody you know!! We MUST protect our children!!!
Also....PLEASE express your feelings to:
Senior Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick
New York State Court of Appeals
20 Eagle Street
Albany, New York 12207
Phone: (518) 455-7700


Letter to
New York Court of Appeals
I just signed the following petition addressed to: New York Court of Appeals.

----------------
STOP Legality of Viewing Child Porn in New York

Viewing child pornography online isn't a crime, the New York Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday in the case of a college professor whose work computer was found to have stored more than a hundred illegal images in its Web cache.
Senior Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick wrote for a majority of four of the six judges. The court dismissed one of the counts of promoting a sexual performance of a child and one of the dozens of counts of possession of child pornography on which James D. Kent was convicted. The judge decided that this is voyeurism, but not child pornography. (WHAT??? NOT pornography??? These children (and women) were NOT willing participants!)
"Merely viewing Web images of child pornography does not, absent other proof, constitute either possession or procurement within the meaning of our Penal Law," Senior Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick wrote for a majority of four of the six judges. "Rather, some affirmative act is required (printing, saving, downloading, etc.) to show that defendant in fact exercised dominion and control over the images that were on his screen," Ciparick wrote. "To hold otherwise, would extend the reach of (state law) to conduct — viewing — that our Legislature has not deemed criminal."
Kent had a folder on his computer that stored about 13,000 saved images of girls whom investigators estimated to be 8 or 9 years old!
PLEASE sign this and share this with everybody you know!! We MUST protect our children!!!
Also....PLEASE express your feelings to:
Senior Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick
New York State Court of Appeals
20 Eagle Street
Albany, New York 12207
Phone: (518) 455-7700

----------------

Sincerely,