STOP BOARD OVERREACH: PROTECT FREE SPEECH, DUE PROCESS & MEDICAL ETHICS


STOP BOARD OVERREACH: PROTECT FREE SPEECH, DUE PROCESS & MEDICAL ETHICS
The Issue
WHEN RULES DON’T EXIST, NO ONE IS PROTECTED
STOP PUNISHING CLINICAL JUDGMENT. PROTECT PROVIDERS. PROTECT PATIENTS.
A clinician lost everything… for recommending a treatment that was never performed.
Not performing it.
Not causing harm.
Recommending it.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT ONE CASE — THIS IS HOW RIGHTS DISAPPEAR
Not with a new law.
Not with a public vote.
But quietly.
With unelected politically appointed boards deciding:
- “We’ll make the rules later.”
- “We’ll ignore the evidence now.”
- “We’ll punish first, justify never.”
And when challenged?
- The system (courts) says: “That’s acceptable.”
LET’S BE UNMISTAKABLY CLEAR
- Not one complainant ever received pelvic floor therapy (PFT)
- Not one patient who actually received PFT has ever filed a complaint
The discipline was based entirely on:
- A recommendation
- Not an action
- Not an outcome
This is no longer regulating treatment.
This is regulating clinical judgment itself.
THIS IS GOVERNMENT OVERREACH, PLAIN AND SIMPLE
A system where:
- Rules are created after the fact
- Evidence is ignored without consequence
- Experts are dismissed despite contradicting findings
- Approved training is redefined overnight
- Punishment happens without justification
- And courts allow it to stand
That is not regulation.
That is control.
THIS IS THE PRECEDENT BEING SET
If this stands:
- You can be punished for a recommendation alone
- Treatment does not need to occur
- Harm does not need to exist
- Standards do not need to be written
- Evidence does not need to be followed
You don’t have to break a rule.
They can create one for you—after the fact.
IF YOU HOLD A LICENSE
You are not protected by:
- Your education
- Your documentation
- Your outcomes
- Your experience
You can:
- Follow every guideline
- Practice ethically for decades
- Use evidence-based care
…and still lose everything.
Because now, your clinical reasoning itself can be treated as misconduct.
IF YOU ARE A PATIENT
You’re not protected either.
Your options disappear
Providers will stop recommending:
- Pelvic floor therapy
- Specialized treatments
- Anything that carries regulatory risk
Your autonomy is taken
- Mandatory third-party observers
- No right to refuse them
You will be forced to receive care with a stranger present
even if you explicitly do not want that.
Your costs rise. Your access shrinks.
- Increased staffing requirements
- Small clinics pushed out
- Fewer providers willing to treat
Result:
- Less care
- Higher cost
- Worse outcomes
Your care may no longer be about YOU
Instead of:
- Clinical judgment
- Individualized treatment
- Evidence-based decisions
You get:
- Whatever a regulatory body decides is acceptable
—even if they don’t perform the treatment
—even if it contradicts the training they approved
WHY THIS SHOULD CONCERN EVERYONE
This is bigger than one profession.
This is about whether:
- Facts still matter
- Standards must exist before enforcement
- Evidence still carries weight
- Expertise is respected
Or whether:
- Decisions can be based on feelings/perception, not proof.
WHAT WE ARE DEMANDING — AS THERAPISTS
We, as licensed providers, call for:
- No discipline for recommendations grounded in objective findings
- Clear, written standards before enforcement
- Zero tolerance for retroactive rulemaking
- Evidence-based disciplinary processes
- Recognition of established clinical training and guidelines
- Protection of clinical judgment
- Equal treatment under the law for all providers
WHAT WE ARE DEMANDING — AS PATIENTS
We, as patients, call for:
- The right to receive recommendations based on clinical need—not fear
- Full access to evidence-based treatments, including pelvic floor therapy
- The right to accept or refuse who is present during our care
- Protection of our privacy, dignity, and autonomy
- Care guided by medical expertise—not administrative interpretation
- Transparency in how treatment standards are created and enforced
We do not want restricted care.
We do not want controlled options.
We want informed choice.
TAKE ACTION
If you:
- Hold a license
- Receive care
- Or expect fairness in how decisions are made
This affects you.
Because if this stands:
- Clinical reasoning becomes a liability.
- And patients pay the price.
SIGN THE PETITION
SHARE IT. MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO IGNORE
FINAL REALITY
When a provider can lose everything for recommending care that was never performed…
We are no longer regulating healthcare.
We are controlling it.
BECAUSE IF RULES DON’T HAVE TO EXIST…
Nothing protects you.
- Not your license.
- Not your profession.
- Not your healthcare.
Nothing.
AND WHEN RULES CAN BE MADE UP AFTER THE FACT…
You don’t have rights.
You have permission.
And permission can be taken away.
1
The Issue
WHEN RULES DON’T EXIST, NO ONE IS PROTECTED
STOP PUNISHING CLINICAL JUDGMENT. PROTECT PROVIDERS. PROTECT PATIENTS.
A clinician lost everything… for recommending a treatment that was never performed.
Not performing it.
Not causing harm.
Recommending it.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT ONE CASE — THIS IS HOW RIGHTS DISAPPEAR
Not with a new law.
Not with a public vote.
But quietly.
With unelected politically appointed boards deciding:
- “We’ll make the rules later.”
- “We’ll ignore the evidence now.”
- “We’ll punish first, justify never.”
And when challenged?
- The system (courts) says: “That’s acceptable.”
LET’S BE UNMISTAKABLY CLEAR
- Not one complainant ever received pelvic floor therapy (PFT)
- Not one patient who actually received PFT has ever filed a complaint
The discipline was based entirely on:
- A recommendation
- Not an action
- Not an outcome
This is no longer regulating treatment.
This is regulating clinical judgment itself.
THIS IS GOVERNMENT OVERREACH, PLAIN AND SIMPLE
A system where:
- Rules are created after the fact
- Evidence is ignored without consequence
- Experts are dismissed despite contradicting findings
- Approved training is redefined overnight
- Punishment happens without justification
- And courts allow it to stand
That is not regulation.
That is control.
THIS IS THE PRECEDENT BEING SET
If this stands:
- You can be punished for a recommendation alone
- Treatment does not need to occur
- Harm does not need to exist
- Standards do not need to be written
- Evidence does not need to be followed
You don’t have to break a rule.
They can create one for you—after the fact.
IF YOU HOLD A LICENSE
You are not protected by:
- Your education
- Your documentation
- Your outcomes
- Your experience
You can:
- Follow every guideline
- Practice ethically for decades
- Use evidence-based care
…and still lose everything.
Because now, your clinical reasoning itself can be treated as misconduct.
IF YOU ARE A PATIENT
You’re not protected either.
Your options disappear
Providers will stop recommending:
- Pelvic floor therapy
- Specialized treatments
- Anything that carries regulatory risk
Your autonomy is taken
- Mandatory third-party observers
- No right to refuse them
You will be forced to receive care with a stranger present
even if you explicitly do not want that.
Your costs rise. Your access shrinks.
- Increased staffing requirements
- Small clinics pushed out
- Fewer providers willing to treat
Result:
- Less care
- Higher cost
- Worse outcomes
Your care may no longer be about YOU
Instead of:
- Clinical judgment
- Individualized treatment
- Evidence-based decisions
You get:
- Whatever a regulatory body decides is acceptable
—even if they don’t perform the treatment
—even if it contradicts the training they approved
WHY THIS SHOULD CONCERN EVERYONE
This is bigger than one profession.
This is about whether:
- Facts still matter
- Standards must exist before enforcement
- Evidence still carries weight
- Expertise is respected
Or whether:
- Decisions can be based on feelings/perception, not proof.
WHAT WE ARE DEMANDING — AS THERAPISTS
We, as licensed providers, call for:
- No discipline for recommendations grounded in objective findings
- Clear, written standards before enforcement
- Zero tolerance for retroactive rulemaking
- Evidence-based disciplinary processes
- Recognition of established clinical training and guidelines
- Protection of clinical judgment
- Equal treatment under the law for all providers
WHAT WE ARE DEMANDING — AS PATIENTS
We, as patients, call for:
- The right to receive recommendations based on clinical need—not fear
- Full access to evidence-based treatments, including pelvic floor therapy
- The right to accept or refuse who is present during our care
- Protection of our privacy, dignity, and autonomy
- Care guided by medical expertise—not administrative interpretation
- Transparency in how treatment standards are created and enforced
We do not want restricted care.
We do not want controlled options.
We want informed choice.
TAKE ACTION
If you:
- Hold a license
- Receive care
- Or expect fairness in how decisions are made
This affects you.
Because if this stands:
- Clinical reasoning becomes a liability.
- And patients pay the price.
SIGN THE PETITION
SHARE IT. MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO IGNORE
FINAL REALITY
When a provider can lose everything for recommending care that was never performed…
We are no longer regulating healthcare.
We are controlling it.
BECAUSE IF RULES DON’T HAVE TO EXIST…
Nothing protects you.
- Not your license.
- Not your profession.
- Not your healthcare.
Nothing.
AND WHEN RULES CAN BE MADE UP AFTER THE FACT…
You don’t have rights.
You have permission.
And permission can be taken away.
1
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on April 22, 2026