Do not decrease the number of lanes or the speed limit on 35th Ave SW in West Seattle

Petition Closed

Do not decrease the number of lanes or the speed limit on 35th Ave SW in West Seattle

This petition had 1,069 supporters
Robert Neel started this petition to The Seattle Department of Transportation

·       35th Ave SW is the primary north-south ARTERIAL in West Seattle.

·       This is the primary transit corridor for both private vehicles and metro buses through West Seattle to the primary exit from the neighborhood, the West Seattle Bridge.

·       35th Ave SW channels approximately 24,600 motor vehicles per day (at SW Alaska).

·       This motor vehicular volume is approximately 7,000 more per day than the other north-south roadways. 

·       This volume will likely increase with the new construction and housing/condominium projects in West Seattle.

·       To accommodate the traffic volume, 35th Ave SW has been a 4-lane road for over 10 years.

·       Adjacent land uses include multiple family homes, single family residences and commercial use. 

·       The only schools located on 35th are within one block and include a Montessori Preschool and private religious elementary schools.

 ·       Under the guise of “safety” SDOT proposes to reduce the speed limit from 35 to 30 mph, and reduce number of lanes from 4 to 3.

·       Experience with “re-channeling” Delridge, a 2 lane road with considerable less volume than 35th Ave SW, shows that traffic is negatively impacted.

·       Therefore, such a reduction in speed and reduction in lanes will cause an increase in traffic (i.e. bottleneck) and time delays, especially given the bus routes (both metro and school).  SDOT acknowledges a 3-4 minute increase in the time to travel the corridor.

·       We believe that the current speed limit and lane numbers are appropriate for this high-volume corridor.

·       We are concerned that this slow-down will tempt drivers to shift their commute to other, narrower, non-arterial side streets.

·       If the primary concern is pedestrian safety then we believe there are more appropriate options, including the following possibilities:

o   Move the Bus stops to mid-block so that a traffic lane is not blocked when a left-turn lane is required.

o   Add marked crosswalks at all intersections; major crosswalks should have flashing lights overhead or embedded in the street on either side of the crosswalk.

o   Add additional lighted crosswalks.

o   Add traffic cameras/speed traps.

 ·   Furthermore, SDOT data shows that this is a “problem” that doesn’t need to be fixed:

City-wide data:

o   The population has increased 14% (2004-2013)

o   Average daily traffic is trending lower; down 8% from 2004-2013

o   Collisions have decreased 35% (2005-2013) and continue to show this downward trend.  The “collision rate” has dropped.

o   Collisions due to speed have slightly declined, whereas collisions due to distractions [not addressed by SDOT’s proposals] “increased substantially.”

o   Serious and fatal collisions are trending lower

o   In 2013: One pedestrian fatality and one serious injury collision occurred on 35th Ave SW compared to one vehicular fatality and three serious injury collisions that occurred on Delridge.

o   Pedestrian-involved collisions per capita have fallen by one-fourth (2005-2013)

o   Not granting right-of-way to pedestrians [also not addressed by SDOT’s proposals] “continues to be the top contributor to crashes”

Data for the “corridor” – 35th Ave SW between Roxbury and Alaska

o   No bicycle collisions occurred on the corridor in 2013

o   Bicycle volume on the corridor is too low to be counted (<10)

o   Pedestrian volume on the corridor is too low to be indicated

o   The corridor has approximately 24,000 vehicles/day at the north end, which suggests a volume too high for it to be a candidate for a “road diet.”

 CONCLUSION:  SDOT has proposed two alternatives, A & B, for putting 35th on a “road diet” (refer to the SDOT website for details).  They have indicated in meetings that one of these two will be implemented, therefore “None of the above” is not a possibility.  Neither option is acceptable to us.  So the choice of “None” is what we seek.


Petition Closed

This petition had 1,069 supporters

Share this petition