Resuscitate Green Lanes ! Bring the High Street back to Life before it's too late !

This petition had 297 supporters

The Issue

Businesses on the high street have been majorly effected by the road works currently taking place in order to create cycle lanes in the area which was opposed by around 80% of the local residents and businesses in the beginning. 

We opened Pussy Bow Boutique in September 2015 and since have been trying to build up a new local business and clientele base which is already a challenge in itself within this turbulent retail market. However since 2016 all the businesses including ourselves had heard about the idea of implementing a cycle lane throughout Green Lanes and taking parking for customers and local residents away which almost everyone did not think would be a good idea, the local council along with Sadiq Khan ignored the peoples views and concerns by going ahead without any consideration or empathy.

Due to the distribution our sales have fallen, there is no longer parking for customers, the pavements have been blocked off preventing all our deliveries coming in, heavy traffic, accidents have been caused... complete mayhem ! DISASTER ZONE ! 

Furthermore, Enfield Council has increased the rate-able value which ideally with the old rate-able value would have meant we would have been exempt of business rates instead with the increased our payments remaining the same and no sign of small business relief. 

How can you justify a small shop selling a product, not offering a service to survive under these circumstances??? 

We want the rate-able value reassessed, we want business rates reduced, we want our high street to accommodate for our customers and most importantly we want it to be safe for the public, children and those who wish to cycle. 

avatar of the starter
Pussy Bow BoutiquePetition Starter

The Decision Makers

Sadiq Khan
Mayor of London
Responded
Dear Petitioner Thank you for the petition submitted on the change.org website about works currently being completed on Green Lanes in London Borough of Enfield. We note that the petition states that 80% of residents opposed the scheme. The actual consultation report on the A105 scheme is publicly available to view through the following link: http://cycleenfield.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/A105-Consultation-Report.pdf. The London Borough of Enfield conducted extensive public engagement with regard to the generalities of the scheme, including public exhibitions and a 12 week informal consultation. In addition, this scheme has been subject to a series of decisions by Enfield Council and subsequent reviews of those decisions. These documents are available to the public and can be found on Enfield’s website: Meeting on 10 February 2016: https://governance.enfield.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=107&MId=9283 Meeting on 9 March 2016: https://governance.enfield.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=115&MId=9620 Meeting on 8 September 2016: https://governance.enfield.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=115&MId=9832 Improving cycling infrastructure on London’s high streets is a major priority for the Mayor. London Borough of Enfield’s independent projections show that the population of the borough will grow to over 400,000, therefore the Council believes it is essential that it provides the infrastructure to encourage people to cycle local trips safely. If the Council does not invest in new infrastructure, the borough’s roads will become more and more congested which will have a knock on effect for the local community and economy. The Mayor appreciates that the construction works along the A105 have created disruption for a number of local residents and businesses. However, looking longer term the Council believes the Cycle Enfield programme will bring significant benefits for the whole of our community. I note you also mention a lack of parking and loading facilities as work was ongoing. As part of the scheme’s construction programme, additional free parking was provided for shoppers in the nearby Ford’s Grove car park as well as parking being available on adjacent streets. If any business believes their business rates to be incorrect they are able to challenge this, and details can be found on the Gov.Uk website at: www.gov.uk. Businesses on the route have had the services of a designated liaison officer, who was able to assist businesses in arranging business deliveries. Other specific issues raised by individual businesses were also able to be resolved in this manner. A list of non-specific business mitigation measures is also available to view publicly at: http://cycleenfield.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Minimising-disruption-for-residents-and-businesses.pdf. Yours sincerely Public Liaison Officer Greater London Authority

Petition Updates