Review Sentencing in Sexual Violence and Self-Defence Cases to Restore Public Confidence

The Issue

Public confidence in our justice system depends on fairness, consistency, and impartiality. When sentencing outcomes appear inconsistent or disproportionate — especially in cases involving sexual violence — that confidence is undermined.

A number of sentencing decisions associated with Judge Farrell have raised serious public concern. These include cases in which individuals convicted of rape received sentences perceived by many as unusually lenient, alongside cases in which women convicted following violent encounters connected to alleged sexual assault have received comparatively severe sentences.

One such case is that of Martyna Ogonowska, who received a life sentence with a minimum term of 17 years after being convicted of murder where it was stated he was sexually assaulting her at the time. While the jury rejected her claim of self-defence, many members of the public, advocacy groups, and legal commentators believe this case highlights broader concerns about how trauma, coercion, and survival responses are assessed within the current legal framework.

We are not alleging misconduct or improper motive. However, the appearance of disparity in sentencing outcomes in cases involving sexual violence is sufficient to warrant independent scrutiny in the public interest.

We therefore call for:

  1. An independent review by the appropriate judicial oversight bodies into sentencing patterns in cases involving sexual violence and self-defence claims.
  2. A review of whether existing sentencing guidelines are being applied consistently and whether they adequately reflect the realities of sexual violence and trauma.
  3. Enhanced judicial training and guidance on sexual violence, coercive control, and trauma-informed decision-making.
  4. Consideration of whether current laws sufficiently protect victims who act in perceived self-defence during sexual assault.
    These steps are essential to maintaining public trust and ensuring that justice is not only done, but is seen to be done.

By signing this petition, you are calling for transparency, accountability, and a justice system that treats all victims of sexual abuse and violence with fairness and dignity.

1,150

The Issue

Public confidence in our justice system depends on fairness, consistency, and impartiality. When sentencing outcomes appear inconsistent or disproportionate — especially in cases involving sexual violence — that confidence is undermined.

A number of sentencing decisions associated with Judge Farrell have raised serious public concern. These include cases in which individuals convicted of rape received sentences perceived by many as unusually lenient, alongside cases in which women convicted following violent encounters connected to alleged sexual assault have received comparatively severe sentences.

One such case is that of Martyna Ogonowska, who received a life sentence with a minimum term of 17 years after being convicted of murder where it was stated he was sexually assaulting her at the time. While the jury rejected her claim of self-defence, many members of the public, advocacy groups, and legal commentators believe this case highlights broader concerns about how trauma, coercion, and survival responses are assessed within the current legal framework.

We are not alleging misconduct or improper motive. However, the appearance of disparity in sentencing outcomes in cases involving sexual violence is sufficient to warrant independent scrutiny in the public interest.

We therefore call for:

  1. An independent review by the appropriate judicial oversight bodies into sentencing patterns in cases involving sexual violence and self-defence claims.
  2. A review of whether existing sentencing guidelines are being applied consistently and whether they adequately reflect the realities of sexual violence and trauma.
  3. Enhanced judicial training and guidance on sexual violence, coercive control, and trauma-informed decision-making.
  4. Consideration of whether current laws sufficiently protect victims who act in perceived self-defence during sexual assault.
    These steps are essential to maintaining public trust and ensuring that justice is not only done, but is seen to be done.

By signing this petition, you are calling for transparency, accountability, and a justice system that treats all victims of sexual abuse and violence with fairness and dignity.

56 people signed this week

1,150


The Decision Makers

Judicial Conduct Board
Judicial Conduct Board
appellate court
appellate court
The Rt Hon David Lammy MP
The Rt Hon David Lammy MP
Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

Supporter Voices

Petition updates