To: The General Medical Council (GMC)

We, concerned citizens and supporters of inclusive language, urge the GMC to reconsider and reverse its decision to remove all references to 'mother' from maternity documents. This decision not only undermines the fundamental importance of motherhood but also disregards the biological reality that women are uniquely capable of giving birth.

While we acknowledge the need for inclusivity and respect for diverse gender identities, it is crucial that we do not erase or diminish the significance of motherhood in our society. The decision made by the GMC has sparked widespread concern among medical professionals, patients, and advocates who recognize that accurate terminology is essential in healthcare settings.

1. Biological Reality:
The removal of 'mother' from maternity documents ignores scientific facts surrounding reproduction. Women are biologically equipped with reproductive systems necessary for pregnancy and childbirth. Denying this reality erodes trust in medical institutions and hinders effective communication between healthcare providers and patients.

2. Patient Care:
Accurate terminology plays a vital role in patient care as it ensures clear communication between healthcare professionals and expectant mothers during prenatal care, labor, delivery, postnatal care, breastfeeding support, etc. Removing references to 'mother' may lead to confusion or miscommunication which can negatively impact patient outcomes.

3. Public Opinion:
A British Council survey of 40,000 people in 102 non-English-speaking countries has put the word at the top of a 70-strong list. It is the only word on the list - which is dominated at the top by soft focus, romantic words, passion, smile, love, eternity - that refers to a relationship between people.  Individuals believe it is important to maintain references to 'mother' on maternity documents as it reflects their personal experiences during pregnancy or childbirth.

4. Legal Implications:
Removing references to 'mother' may have legal implications regarding parental rights recognition as well as potential challenges when seeking legal protection related to pregnancy discrimination or parental leave entitlements based on sex-specific characteristics.

We respectfully request that you reverse this decision immediately so that maternity documents accurately reflect both inclusivity towards diverse gender identities and the biological reality of motherhood. By doing so, you will uphold the integrity of medical practice while ensuring effective communication and compassionate care for all patients.

Please reconsider this decision in light of the concerns raised by medical professionals, patients, and advocates who value both inclusivity and accurate terminology in healthcare settings. Let us work together to find a solution that respects everyone's rights while preserving the importance of motherhood.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Richard Coates