Remove netting that traps and injures birds in businesses

Recent signers:
Kathryn Rabalais and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Recently, during a visit to my local Lowe’s store with my mother, I was deeply disturbed by the sight of at least 30 birds trapped, struggling, and injuring themselves in the netting meant to deter them. The distressing scene was heart-wrenching, as the birds flapped frantically, some with visible injuries, utterly bewildered and desperate to escape. This wasn't just an isolated incident, as similar netting is common in many commercial establishments.

Netting is commonly used by businesses in an effort to prevent birds from nesting or perching within their premises. However, this solution often backfires, creating lethal traps for these creatures. Studies from organizations like the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) highlight the alarming rate of injuries and fatalities associated with such practices. Netting can cause broken wings, entanglement leading to slow, painful deaths, and severe stress to these animals who are simply trying to survive in urban landscapes severely altered by human activity.

There are more humane and effective ways to manage bird presence. For instance, businesses can adopt bird-friendly architecture, use ultrasonic bird repellents, or install specially designed bird spikes that prevent landing without causing harm. The Audubon Society recommends employing deterrents that don't physically endanger wildlife, allowing businesses to operate harmoniously within the local ecology.

The ethical implications of using netting reach far beyond just the immediate harm to birds. It reflects on the values we hold toward other creatures sharing our environment and challenges us to reconsider our approach to human-wildlife coexistence.

I urge Lowe’s and other businesses to reassess their use of netting and consider these alternative methods. Humane solutions not only preserve biodiversity but also enhance the public image of businesses as environmentally responsible and ethical entities.

Let's stand together to advocate for a change toward more compassionate practices in businesses everywhere. Sign this petition to demand the removal of harmful netting and promote humane alternatives for bird management in commercial establishments. Together, we can make a difference.

183

Recent signers:
Kathryn Rabalais and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Recently, during a visit to my local Lowe’s store with my mother, I was deeply disturbed by the sight of at least 30 birds trapped, struggling, and injuring themselves in the netting meant to deter them. The distressing scene was heart-wrenching, as the birds flapped frantically, some with visible injuries, utterly bewildered and desperate to escape. This wasn't just an isolated incident, as similar netting is common in many commercial establishments.

Netting is commonly used by businesses in an effort to prevent birds from nesting or perching within their premises. However, this solution often backfires, creating lethal traps for these creatures. Studies from organizations like the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) highlight the alarming rate of injuries and fatalities associated with such practices. Netting can cause broken wings, entanglement leading to slow, painful deaths, and severe stress to these animals who are simply trying to survive in urban landscapes severely altered by human activity.

There are more humane and effective ways to manage bird presence. For instance, businesses can adopt bird-friendly architecture, use ultrasonic bird repellents, or install specially designed bird spikes that prevent landing without causing harm. The Audubon Society recommends employing deterrents that don't physically endanger wildlife, allowing businesses to operate harmoniously within the local ecology.

The ethical implications of using netting reach far beyond just the immediate harm to birds. It reflects on the values we hold toward other creatures sharing our environment and challenges us to reconsider our approach to human-wildlife coexistence.

I urge Lowe’s and other businesses to reassess their use of netting and consider these alternative methods. Humane solutions not only preserve biodiversity but also enhance the public image of businesses as environmentally responsible and ethical entities.

Let's stand together to advocate for a change toward more compassionate practices in businesses everywhere. Sign this petition to demand the removal of harmful netting and promote humane alternatives for bird management in commercial establishments. Together, we can make a difference.

The Decision Makers

Lowe's Corporate Management
Lowe's Corporate Management
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates