SIGN TO SHOW PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR THE NEED TO REMOVE MICHAEL J APRAHAMIAN AND RALPH RAMIREZ FROM THE WAUKESHA JUDICIARY IN WISCONSIN. 

Michael J Aprahamian and Ralph Ramirez have violated their judicial oath to uphold the Constitution and Wisconsin Law and have denied 14th Constitutional Ammendment Rights and refused to uphold the 2003 Wisconsin Legislative Act 130 in violation of the oath of judicial office as a public servant.

Aprahmain was reversed 5 times by the Wisconsin District 2 Appellate court. The first reversal was on the final order in the divorce case where Aprahamian unlawfully gave sole custody to and placed the four children with special needs with the undisputed abuser and alcoholic who had also reported a sex addiction and was was arrested for a DUI, domestic abuse, sexual assault, and violations of the restraining order. The abuser stipulated to Ms. Valadez having sole custody and his supervised visits as necessary, he stipulated to the domestic abuse injunction, plead the 5th to the threats to kill Ms. Valadez, plead the 5th to the domestic abuse, and plead the 5th to the sexual assault of Ms. Valadez. He took the children from their stay at home mother, primary caretaker, attachment figure, and their support person for the therapy for their special needs and with whom the children had in home services. Ms. Valadez appealed (Appellate Briefs: Appellant Brief/ Appellant Final Response) and firm in Washington D.C. DV LEAP Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment Appellate Project took this case as their first case in Wisconsin to set case law to uphold the Wisconsin legislation passed in 2003 Act 130 that protects victims of domestic of abuse and which was violated by Aprahamian. Aprahamain then began one of the worst cases of judicial retaliation against Ms. Valadez as she appealed and then reported the continued misconduct of Aprahamian. 

Aprahamian then unlawfully ordered all of Mr. Valadez retirement accounts to be given in percentages to the attorneys with no bills or motions for any fees in the record anywhere and threatened Ms. Valadez if she didn't put the money in her name and then give it unlawfully to the attorneys she will "have hell to pay" 

Aprahamian then continued to make unlawful orders consistent with racketeering as he ordered more money unlawfully to attorneys that was not owed them and then obstructing justice as he ordered Ms. Valadez she couldn't speak with the clerks in the courthouse or enter the business center where the criminal evidence was of his appointed GAL for the criminal referral of charges for knowingly violating Ms. Valadez Wisconsin Department of Justice Safe at Home Program. 
The FBI has been investigating this case and has gone to the US Attorney Generals office with evidence of Public Corruption: 
SOME OF THE EVIDENCE PROVIDED TO THE FBI

Then Aprahamian unlawfully kidnapped one of the four minor children from the mother when the minor began to report the abuse of his father while in his placement with him and Aprahamian placed him exclusively with the abuser which caused the minor to be hospitalized three times in the inpatient hospital for high risk suicidal ideation. Aprahamian refused to act to protect the child and the minor to this day is unlawfully trapped with the domestic abuser despite trying to run away and reporting to the police and the hospital the abuse and asking for help. Aprahamian then, again without a hearing, unlawfully entered a document prohibiting the child any contact with his mother, the safe protective parent sand his support person for his special needs. 

Aprahamian then began to unlawfully sentence Ms. Valadez to jail sentences for asking for the invoice from the court reporter, stating her objection on the record as a pro se litigant to preserve her record for appeal when they kidnapped her son, for exercising her right to not consent to signing a consent form to release her Federally protected Health and Human Services Records, and for exercising her right to decline to be evaluated by Waukesha Health and Human Services and she has been working regularly with a therapist for the abuse of Mr. Valadez since 2014 and during the court abuse and as a crime victim has been seeing her therapist weekly and the only diagnosis is ptsd from the abuse. Ms. Valadez had to flee the state to protect herself from Aprahamian and the Waukesha Police, Da's office, and Sheriffs Department who were colluding to use a fake bench warrant to unlawfully get Ms. Valadez address from the Wisconsin Department of Justice Safe at Home Program. They lied to the DOJ under Aprahamian's private emails to the Waukesha police, Da's, and Sheriffs Department instructing them to take immediate action to go find her and they asked back to him what he wanted them to "do with her" when they got her. (See FBI Document Link) During this time Aprahamian also unlawfully suspended placement of all the children from Ms. Valadez stating that she would be in jail. (He never returned the children despite the children reporting abuse, reporting being afraid of their father, hospitalizations for high risk suicide, cutting themselves and self harm, and running away from the father. He allowed the father to continue the abuse and concealing of the children from Ms. Valadez which is a felony offense). 

The Wisconsin District 2 Appellate Court had to take do an emergency intervention to stop Aprahamian as all of this was unlawful. The Appellate court reversed 4 of the wrongful jail sentences Aprahamian had ordered in violation of the law.  The Appellate Court also noted that the Assistant Attorney General Brian Keenan, who was a previous colleague at the same firm as Aprahamian, had filed a brief that lied to the appellate court. (1)The first appellate order reversing Aprahamain. (2)The Second Appellate Order reversing Aprahamian.

A number of attorneys including the public defenders office motion Aprahamian to recuse himself from the case and he refused. 

Ms. Valadez won in her appeal of the family court ruling as the Appellate court ruled in the appeal to uphold the 2003 Wisconsin Legislative Act 130 that protected Ms. Valadez and the children as the court undisputedly found Mr. Valadez to engage in a pattern of domestic abuse. The Appellate court found that Mr. Valadez did not qualify for any custody of the children and that placement was required by law to be with Ms. Valadez and the children's safety as the paramount consideration and reversed Aprahamians order. 

Due to the severe safety concern Ms. Valadez had with Aprahmian and the investigation for his criminal activity related to the case she moved to have him removed from the case for cause after the 5 reversals and Ralph Ramirez was assigned to the case. 

Ralph Ramirez has refused to follow the law and the appellate order to this day and now Ms. Valadez has no information of her children and no way of communicating with them as Ralph Ramirez oversaw the continued illegal kidnapping of the children from Ms. Valadez by the abuser. 

When Ralph Ramirez took the case instead of vacating the reversed orders he kept them in place. He even stated on the record that Aprahamian was an intelligent man as his reasoning. 

A writ was filed against Ralph Ramirez for indicating his intent to defy the law and the appellate order. Justice Grogan clarified that the actions by Ralph Ramirez were unlawful. 

Due to Ralph Ramirez overseeing the unlawful kidnapping of the Valadez children completely from their mother in defiance of the law and the appellate order, the case is now before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. 
There is a letter campaign you can get involved with by clicking here.

Due to the misconduct of Ralph Ramirez Ms. Valadez reported "You want me to pay my abuser and rapist who abducted my children out of the nothing I have because everything has been unlawfully taken from me."-Julie Valadez after Ralph Ramirez refused to follow the law and the appellate order. That is the current state of the case. 

Neither Aprahamian or Ramirez are willing to abide by the oath of the judicial office to uphold the constitution and the law and comply with the appellate order and instead continues to punish Ms. Valadez against the law. These corrupt and abusive judges are willing to use children as pawns in their unlawful orders from the bench as a means of punishment for Ms. Valadez reporting the misconduct and speaking up and insisting the law be followed. Attorneys have told Ms. Valadez: Aprahamian and Ramirez are intent to put you in jail in retaliation and it does not matter to them that it is not legal. 

The Valadez children need your help, they are kidnapped unlawfully from their mother to this day with no ability for them to have any contact as they are being unlawfully concealed from Ms. Valadez and threatened that if they reach out to their mother that there will be harm to her. 

*If you have contact with the Valadez children help them, do not be complicit in this abuse and illegal conduct toward them. They have a right to their mother, being an accomplice in concealing them from their mother is also a felony in the state of Wisconsin. 

For those who are residence of Waukesha County you can sign the official recall petition, go to Wisconsin Women For Change to learn more. 
You can also go to the Facebook page for RECALL APRAHAMIAN and the Facebook page for RECALL RAMIREZ. 

You can also go to Julie Valadez YouTube channel to learn more, her Twitter Account, and her Facebook page. 

Sign this public petition as a call for change, we need to end judicial abuse and court ordered abuse and STAND FOR POSITIVE CHANGE. 
Michael J. Aprahamian and Ralph Ramirez need to be removed from the bench. 

*This is not the only case that this misconduct is happening. Aprahamian and Ramirez are both routinely defying Wisconsin 2003 Legislative Act 130 and placing children with known abusers in violation of Wisconsin law. Please see the comment section for others who have been impacted. Leave a comment of how these judges have violated the law in your case. The misconduct of these judges with GALs is also routine and a systemic issue in the Waukesha courthouse that they perpetuate. It has to stop. 

Letter to Wisconsin Legislature and Governors Office to initiate removal proceedings in Wisconsin Statute 17.06
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aafKbd5oG-dVjbVXBydjBgS7Dl5Tkj2YXbo9tuaNfVo/edit?usp=sharing