Imagine finding yourself behind bars for a crime that is impossible to commit simply because there is no existing law under which you can be charged. This nightmare is a harsh reality for a man wrongfully imprisoned under a statute that does not exist. His future, freedom, and family all hang in the balance due to a grave miscarriage of justice.

Incorrectly imprisoned under fictitious legal grounds, this individual is suffering due to a system failure that must be corrected immediately. With no evidence or legal foundation to support his conviction, he remains trapped in a limbo of injustice.

Freedom is a fundamental right, and justice must prevail when that right is stripped under false pretenses. This man's story is a stark reminder of the imperfections within our justice system, where errors can destroy lives. The profound injustice he's experiencing calls for immediate rectification and awareness to prevent future occurrences.

We need to act now to correct this grave injustice. Legal reviews and an appeal should occur to examine the flaws in this conviction. Authorities must look into the unsubstantiated charges leading to imprisonment, and his case should be revisited with full transparency and urgency.

Your voice is vital in urging the relevant legal bodies to take immediate action. We need your support to bring this man home where he belongs, reunite him with his family, and restore his faith in justice. Please help us rectify this travesty by signing this petition and calling for the immediate release of an innocent man. Stand with us to see justice served. Sign the petition today. 

Myron Anderson Jr., convicted in a case in Arkansas, under a statute that doesn’t exist. He is also innocent of such charges, and man who in deed did crime, is serving a life sentence plus.
This man also offered to write statement and take responsibility for what he done and prove that Myron was not at all involved in this case. He is sitting in an Arkansas prison although he is innocent!!! Please help or advise on what I can do to help him find the help he needs. Below is only some of the information to start.

On or about November 23 - 2006 I was accused of shooting 7 people inside a night club in Crossett Arkansas. My brother Michael Anderson was also charge and convicted in this case and we had a joint trial. I was charge and convicted of 5 counts of terroristic acts and one count of felony in possession of a fire arm. 2 of the terroristic acts were dismiss because two of the victims didn’t show up at trial. Me an my brother was sentence a 110 years in the A.D.C. I have about 15 years left to do if I don’t succeed on appeal. I had a paid lawyer and he raised three grounds for me. A motion of a direct verdict of acquittal due to insufficient evidence. One of the jury members was the brother in law of one of the victims. And the court added a new jury panel without notifying the defendants. I had exhausted all my state and federal remedies on those grounds. Back in 2013 when the supreme court of Arkansas denied my brother appeal for his rule 37 post-conviction. The supreme court let us know that there was a conflict between the terroristic act statue. The hard copy version and the electronic version. After I did my research because the court said that the prosecutor and judge had charged and convicted us under a terroristic act statue a.c.a 5-13-310 a .1. a. So I had filed a error Coram nobis so the supreme court could interpret the statute . They quoted that there is no subsection a.c.a 5-13-310a.1a repl 2006. There is only a a.c.a 5-13-310a.1 and a a.c.a 5-13-310a.2 they the Arkansas code revision and the prosecution changed the meaning of the legislative act by added a semicolon and the letters a and b separating the elements in 5-13-3102:1. Me and my brother was charge under a statute that don’t exist. Me and my brother was the only ones in the united states who was charged and convicted on a terroristic act when the state didn’t have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that we shot at an occupiable structure or a Conveyance which is being operated by a person.
The prosecution enforces the unconstitutional terroristic act statue a.c.a 5-13-310a.1.a Repl. 2006. So now I filed a declaratory judgment and an injunction relief challenging the statue. I was charge and convicted of a fire arm and they have no gun. And, I didn’t do the offense period. I took someone else charge. The guy who did it is willing to write a statement and take is charge which is newly discovered evidence of a third-party confession.

Myron's attorney was also fined in misconduct charges and since been found guilty of misconduct charges in other cases and gave up his bar/attorney license since. there is so much more to this case and he does not deserve to sit in prison for an act done by someone else. who is offering to write a statement that he is in fact the shooter, and not Myron. why is this continuing to happen in the US ?