Reject the Complicity of the High Court in Nefarious and Unlawful Activities 

Background:  

-         In the criminal matter DPP v David Keenan, in the County Court of Victoria (“County Court”), the accused was prosecuted for charges of blackmail and stalking.

-        However, it came to light during the proceedings that the forensic evidence being utilised by the DPP/Crown, to prosecute and convict Mr Keenan, had been manufactured by police (VicPol).

-        But, incredibly, Judge Gabriele ‘Gobbo’ Cannon stopped Mr Keenan testifying and cross-examining witnesses about that manufactured forensic evidence, in order to conceal or cover-up the framing by police.

-         Hence, Mr Keenan was convicted in the matter on the basis of manufactured evidence, brought before the County Court by the DPP/Crown and concealment of evidence by Judge Cannon.  After convicting him, Judge Cannon went further and attempted to thwart the process of Mr Keenan appealing his conviction.

-         Mr Keenan was able to appeal his conviction in the Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal (“Court of Appeal”) (Keenan v The Queen), where appeal judges Niall & Priest were faced with an impossibly sensitive situation, given the DPP/Crown had used manufactured evidence to convict and Judge Cannon had covered-up same.

-        But, uncovering the nefarious and unlawful actions of the DPP/Crown and Judge Cannon in the County Court proved a challenge too great for Judges Niall & Priest - instead, Judges Niall & Priest acted to work around Mr Keenan's appeal application, to cover up what had taken place in the lower court.

-       Judges Niall & Priest refused to deal with all of the grounds of appeal, failed to set aside Mr Keenan’s conviction, created a false narrative and published false & misleading public records (reasons for judgement) to rationalise their refusals, to overturn Mr Keenan’s conviction and to deal with that unlawfulness. 

Upon application for Special Leave to appeal, in the High Court of Australia (“High Court”), Justices Gordon & Nettle were misled by those false & misleading reasons for judgement produced by Judges Niall & Priest, which were required to be tendered in the matter and upon which those justices relied - hence, the High Court’s refusal to grant Special Leave was based upon misinformation supplied to it by the Court of Appeal. 

The High Court has since become aware of the operation of the ‘sham courts’ by the County Court and the Court of Appeal, that were conducted to work around the DPP/Crown prosecuting the matter using fabricated forensic evidence and to cover-up nefarious and unlawful activities.  The High Court has also become aware that the Court of Appeal provided it with false & misleading information.

However, the High Court remains complicit with the operation of those sham courts by the County Court and the Court of Appeal, adopting the sham persona of those two lower courts in a natural way, in this matter.  The High Court is also thus far complicit with the creation and publication of false & misleading reasons for judgement, upon which the High Court relies in its decision-making, allowing the Court of Appeal to create and publish same; the High Court is yet to denounce the nefarious and unlawful activities of the lower courts and their judicial officers.    

Sign & Share this Petition:

By signing and sharing this petition you will be:

-          rejecting corruption in the Court of Appeal by its judicial officers (rejecting the active fixing, fudging, skewing or manipulating of the outcome of criminal proceedings);

-          rejecting the publication of false & misleading public records by the Court of Appeal;

-          rejecting the County Court engaging in cover-up and attempting to thwart, stop or interfere in the appeals process to the Court of Appeal;   

-          rejecting the framing of an accused for criminal offences by the DPP/Crown and police (e.g.: rejecting the manufacturing of forensic evidence by police); 

-          rejecting the involvement of police, the DPP/Crown and judicial officers of the courts in joint criminal enterprises as in this case, the Lawyer X scandal, etc;

-          rejecting the involvement of the County Court, the Court of Appeal and the High Court in the joint criminal enterprise undertaken by police, the DPP/Crown and the courts, to pervert the course of justice; and

-          petitioning the High Court not to be complicit with the nefarious and unlawful actions and activities of the County Court and the Court of Appeal, and not to accept the creation, publication and tendering of false & misleading information to the High Court, i.e.: not to adopt the persona of a sham court during the reign of Gageler (the current time period wherein Stephen Gageler reigns as the Chief Justice of the High Court).

Maintaining the integrity of the criminal justice system and the wider court systems is critically important and always worth fighting for.  Sign & share this petition today!