The case of Lucy Letby has captured the public’s imagination, provoking righteous outrage at the alleged murder of newborn babies. While knee-jerk reactions are naturally to be avoided, after a suitable interval the debate on capital punishment must be reopened by parliament.

In the most extreme cases (infanticide, terrorism, mass murder, & treason), the government should make the death penalty available to judges as an alternative to life imprisonment.

Arguments against the death penalty are both substantial and compelling, which is why the following caveats are suggested:

1. That capital punishment could only be used in extremis, for the absolute worst crimes.
2. That capital punishment could only be used in cases of certainty – where a confession had been given, or where the video evidence was irrefutable. 
3. That capital punishment could only be used at a judge’s discretion, and would require significant justification and authorisation.  

Before all else, this is an issue of morality. In stealing the birthdays, the rites of passage, the future generations and the memories - not just from those you killed, but also from their families, you have destroyed not one, but multiple lives. Society much demand a penalty for that. 

A reliable majority of the British public supports such a law, and a recent Spectator poll found that two-thirds support the death penalty in the case of child murders.

For further information on this case, whether in support or opposition, please see https://thenewconservative.co.uk/lucy-letby-the-moral-case-for-capital-punishment/ or contact: editor@thenewconservative.co.uk

Thank you.