Protect High-Schoolers in STEM- Protect FTC’s Open Hardware Ecosystem. Don’t Lock FTC In


Protect High-Schoolers in STEM- Protect FTC’s Open Hardware Ecosystem. Don’t Lock FTC In
The Issue
FIRST has announced a major change to the FTC control system through the introduction of Systemcore and Motioncore, along with the FIRST A301 smart actuator. Beginning in the 2027–28 season, teams using the new control system will be restricted to the A301 as the only legal motor and servo actuator, effectively eliminating the use of third-party motors and servos that have long been a defining feature of FTC.
This represents a fundamental shift in how FTC robots are designed. For years, teams have had the freedom to choose from a wide range of legal actuators—such as goBILDA Yellow Jacket motors, AndyMark NeveRest motors, REV HD/Core Hex motors, Studica Mavericks, and others—allowing students to compare specifications, select appropriate gear ratios, and design mechanisms based on real engineering tradeoffs. Under the new system, those choices disappear.
The A301, while well-integrated and feature-rich, is intentionally limited in power and performance and is designed to match, not exceed, the capabilities of existing 550-class motors. Many teams are concerned that this creates a lower performance ceiling than what is currently achievable with commonly used FTC motors, particularly for drivetrains and high-load mechanisms. More importantly, making one proprietary actuator mandatory introduces a single-vendor dependency, reducing competition, resilience, and innovation within the FTC ecosystem.
FTC has historically distinguished itself from programs like VEX by maintaining an open, multi-vendor hardware environment that encourages creativity, vendor innovation, and authentic engineering decision-making. Restricting future FTC robots to a single approved actuator risks eroding that identity and turning FTC into a closed ecosystem where teams are consumers of one predefined solution rather than engineers making meaningful design choices.
This issue is not about opposing new technology or progress. It is about ensuring that FTC’s transition to a new control system does not come at the cost of openness, flexibility, and the educational value that third-party hardware choice provides.
List of Student-Voiced Complaints:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Br31i0WGlmkAQ_bHyuj9id5kSu1sMOpMhlpQbMPf4R0/edit?usp=sharing

678
The Issue
FIRST has announced a major change to the FTC control system through the introduction of Systemcore and Motioncore, along with the FIRST A301 smart actuator. Beginning in the 2027–28 season, teams using the new control system will be restricted to the A301 as the only legal motor and servo actuator, effectively eliminating the use of third-party motors and servos that have long been a defining feature of FTC.
This represents a fundamental shift in how FTC robots are designed. For years, teams have had the freedom to choose from a wide range of legal actuators—such as goBILDA Yellow Jacket motors, AndyMark NeveRest motors, REV HD/Core Hex motors, Studica Mavericks, and others—allowing students to compare specifications, select appropriate gear ratios, and design mechanisms based on real engineering tradeoffs. Under the new system, those choices disappear.
The A301, while well-integrated and feature-rich, is intentionally limited in power and performance and is designed to match, not exceed, the capabilities of existing 550-class motors. Many teams are concerned that this creates a lower performance ceiling than what is currently achievable with commonly used FTC motors, particularly for drivetrains and high-load mechanisms. More importantly, making one proprietary actuator mandatory introduces a single-vendor dependency, reducing competition, resilience, and innovation within the FTC ecosystem.
FTC has historically distinguished itself from programs like VEX by maintaining an open, multi-vendor hardware environment that encourages creativity, vendor innovation, and authentic engineering decision-making. Restricting future FTC robots to a single approved actuator risks eroding that identity and turning FTC into a closed ecosystem where teams are consumers of one predefined solution rather than engineers making meaningful design choices.
This issue is not about opposing new technology or progress. It is about ensuring that FTC’s transition to a new control system does not come at the cost of openness, flexibility, and the educational value that third-party hardware choice provides.
List of Student-Voiced Complaints:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Br31i0WGlmkAQ_bHyuj9id5kSu1sMOpMhlpQbMPf4R0/edit?usp=sharing

678
The Decision Makers
Supporter Voices
Share this petition
Petition created on December 9, 2025