PETITION IN SUPPORT OF VEE GANDHI

The petition has been updated petition to include the reports of electoral fraud.

PETITION TO STRIKE A COMMON LAW GRAND JURY

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (Or Federal Court of Canada)

DATED: May 4, 2025

IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY, ELECTION INTERFERENCE, AND THE RIGHT TO INDEPENDENT CANDIDACY

TO THE HONOURABLE COURT:

We, the undersigned electors and concerned citizens of Canada, respectfully petition this Honourable Court to strike a Common Law Grand Jury for the purpose of investigating and remedying grave and well-documented allegations of electoral fraud, abuse of administrative authority, obstruction of independent candidates, and structural tampering with Canada’s 2025 Federal Election and party leadership process.

WHEREAS:

 1. The Constitution Act, 1867, s. 91(27) vests jurisdiction over criminal law in Parliament, and the common law authorizes citizens to convene Grand Juries for the investigation of public misconduct;

 2. Section 1(d) of the Canadian Bill of Rights guarantees due process, equal access to public office, and fundamental justice in all political institutions;

 3. The Canada Elections Act and Criminal Code establish the legal framework by which elections must be conducted fairly, transparently, and without bias toward any party or candidate;

 4. The 2025 Federal Election was marred by a wide range of well-substantiated electoral irregularities and civil rights violations, including:

I. Sabotage and Administrative Denial of Independent Candidacy

WHEREAS Vee Gandhi, an independent candidate for Nepean, attempted to file nomination papers to run in the riding of Ottawa Centre against interim Prime Minister Mark Carney, but:

 • The Elections Canada online nomination portal failed repeatedly and without resolution;

 • Despite efforts to submit in person, staff refused to accept paper nomination forms or provide alternatives;

 • No extension was granted despite the technical failure being systemic and not caused by the candidate;

 • Gandhi was ultimately denied access to appear on the ballot, even though he was ready, qualified, and met all legal requirements;

 • These acts violated the Canada Elections Act ss. 66–69 and 67(2), and constitute breach of public trust (Criminal Code s. 122) and obstruction of justice (Criminal Code s. 139);

II. Early Voting Before Completion of Candidate Registration

WHEREAS Elections Canada permitted early voting and special ballots to proceed before the full list of nominated candidates had been finalized and disclosed, thereby:

1.  Depriving voters of the ability to cast informed ballots;
2.  Issuing ballots that excluded candidates like Vee Gandhi, who  were still attempting to register;
3.  Violating the Canada Elections Act, ss. 85 and 117;
4.  Constituting fraud on the public under Criminal Code s. 380;

III. Obstruction of Independent Candidates Nationally

WHEREAS other independent and non-affiliated candidates reported:

1.  Disproportionate nomination barriers,
2.  Technical failures without accommodation,
3.  No access to real-time support,
4.  Violations of s. 3 of the Canada Elections Act and s. 1(d) of the Bill of Rights;

IV. Liberal Party Leadership Vote Suppression

WHEREAS the 2025 Liberal Party Leadership race saw:

1. Voter participation among members reduced from 82.16% (in 2013) to only 38.4% in 2025;
2. Thousands of members blocked from voting by complex verification procedures;
3. Reports of vote disqualifications disproportionately affecting grassroots and dissenting members;
4. The outcome heavily favored Mark Carney, who benefited from lower turnout, establishment support, and organizational advantage;
5. A pattern of suffrage suppression contrary to democratic norms and potentially coordinated;

V. Impact of MP Pierre Poilievre’s “Fair Elections Act” (C-23)

WHEREAS this 2014 legislation:

1. Eliminated vouching and voter info cards, suppressing Indigenous, student, and elderly votes;
2. Removed Elections Canada’s power to educate the public;
   Gagged the Chief Electoral Officer and shifted investigative authority to a partisan ministry;
3. Expanded campaign finance loopholes;
4. Favored entrenched party incumbents and disempowered independent oversight;

VI. Registered Voter Suppression and Sabotage

WHEREAS widespread reports documented:

1. Voters showing up to find their names missing;
2. Duplicate and incorrect voter ID cards;
3. Voters told falsely they had already voted;
4. Minimal investigation by the Commissioner of Canada Elections;

VII. Premature Media Projections

WHEREAS the media announced winning candidates in some ridings before voting had closed in other time zones, particularly British Columbia, leading to:

1. Distortion of voter behavior;
2. Erosion of public trust;
3. Violations of the intent of former s. 329 of the Elections Act (repealed by Poilievre’s Bill C-23);

VIII. Pencil Voting and Ballot Tampering Fears

WHEREAS:

1. Canadian ballots are marked in pencil, raising concerns of post-vote alteration;
2. The Elections Commissioner offered no public assurance or review of chain-of-custody;

IX. Ballot Box Mishandling and Transport Irregularities

WHEREAS viral videos depicted:

1. Ballot boxes being transported by Elections Canada staff to private vehicles;
2. Public officials admitting to taking materials home;
3. These acts violated the perception and possibly the integrity of ballot security and election law;

X. Lack of Investigation or Accountability

WHEREAS the Commissioner of Canada Elections has:

Taken no enforcement actions or issued any fines;
Ignored video evidence, sworn reports, and affidavits from concerned citizens;

Allowed systemic breaches to go uninvestigated and unpunished;

XI. Public Outrage and Democratic Crisis

WHEREAS:

Citizens across all social media and civil society have demanded justice and called for a re-vote;
The credibility of Canada’s electoral system is collapsing under the weight of this cumulative misconduct;

THEREFORE, WE THE UNDERSIGNED PETITION THIS HONOURABLE COURT TO:

STRIKE a Common Law Grand Jury composed of twenty-three (23) citizens to investigate, report, and recommend remedies for all the above violations;

AUTHORIZE said Grand Jury to:

1. Subpoena witnesses;
2. Receive sworn evidence;
3. Return presentments of wrongdoing;
4. Recommend indictments under Criminal Code ss. 122, 139, and 380;
5. Recommend annulment or redress of the 2025 election;
6. Recommend civil or criminal prosecution of public officials and administrators;
7. Propose structural electoral reforms to restore democracy;

DIRECT the Sheriff of the Court to summon such jurors in accordance with common law and section 91(27) of the Constitution Act;
GRANT such further and other relief as may be just to restore the integrity of elections and uphold the rule of law in Canada.
Respectfully submitted,

Vee Gandhi

Independent Candidate for Nepean

Email: veegandhi@gmail.com

Website for to make your complaint about the election: cace25.ca/your-election-fraud-story

✍️ Grand Jury Petition: [change.org/GrandJuryPetition]

📜 History of Grand Juries in Canada: https://bit.ly/3Gddarq 

Application for Grand Jury: https://bit.ly/4m24JPR