NOTE: THIS WAS FILED ON PORTER COUNTY COURT; REJECTED: "per Judge Wright . not approved by court to file". ANYTHING THAT OBJECTS TO LANGER AND LANGER IS NOT ALLOWED TO BE FILED IN COURT. EMAIL

The Court also denied the right to put mother in Contempt for not following Court Order on communication.  Call Log

Porter County in Indiana is notorious for its lack of concern over the best interest of a child in a custody dispute over the financial gain that the relevant legal resources and individuals attached can make. Ultimately knowing this we rely on Judges to balance the law. This petition will show that the Members of the Bench in this Petition for change: Magistrates Osan, Magistrate Buckley, Magistrate DaBoer and Magistrate Wright do not have the best interest of a child when presiding. At the head of all this and running the show in Porter County is Michael Allen Langer of Langer and Langer, along with his Associate  Kayleen Tuefel 

This Petition will show acts of flagrant disregard for the laws, civil rights violations enacted by members of bench at the behest of Langer and Langer, witness intimidation, uncountable amounts of perjury, felonies such as email hacking with Judges open consent. Such abuse of the elderly and frail by Michael Langer personally that it will repulse to most harden of you. 

If you take nothing from this. I would suggest at all costs avoid allowing any of the people in the “cast of characters” into your child’s life. These people should not be around children. 

CAST OF CHARACTERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                THE MAGISTRATES

Ana Osan, Superior Court 1 Judge, Valparaiso, Indiana

Magistrate Osan assumed the case.  

• In a status hearing, she made comments to my Attorney Michelle Johnson that forced her to recuse herself and leave me without representation. Those comments should not have been made.
• During the June 2020 hearing: While on the witness stand, Mr. Langer presented two emails allegedly from my email account, Mr. Langer admitted in Court they were stolen.

1. The first email involved communication with my former Attorney, Michelle Johnson, during the time she was representing me. This incident revealed that Mr. Langer had allegedly been violating the Attorney-Client Privilege by accessing my emails and reading communications. The response from my ex-Attorney can be found here ****.
   The second email was a correspondence with a different Lawyer regarding an unrelated issue. When I inquired if he had sent it to Mr. Langer, his response is here. 

****It is noteworthy that Mr. Langer presented the email from Michelle,  which pertained to a contentious issue involving my ex-wife and the Guardian Ad Litem, Michael C. Handlon, proposing a "developmental pediatrician" evaluation for my son. Despite the GAL having positive feedback from the school indicating my son's academic excellence, he seemed inclined to align with Mr. Langer, given their multiple ongoing cases. In response, I engaged the teacher, school Principal, school Social Worker, school psychiatrist, his Doctor, and a former counselor, all of whom asserted that such an evaluation was unnecessary. Despite this, the GAL sided with Mr. Langer, indicating a bias towards his preferences. When the professionals declined to conduct the evaluation due to misinformation, Mr. Langer and the GAL expressed frustration and threatened me with contempt. The email exchange highlights Mr. Langer's insistence on limiting communication with the Doctor to court proceedings, as evident in his demands. At that time, Magistrate DaBoer presided over the case. To submit my son to such an intrusive evaluation would have been child abuse.

2. Magistrate Osan was aware that Magistrate DaBoer had previously ruled that any information from the Parental Evaluation conducted by a Dr Jaffe. should not be presented in Court.  Michael Handlon, the GAL, proceeded to read excerpts from it during the proceedings. This action should have been halted by Magistrate Osan and my Attorney John Rhame, who later acknowledged that Handlon's actions were inappropriate. It has since come to light that the evaluation conducted by Dr. Jaffe was found to be fraudulent and he was not qualified in Indiana. 

3. When I filed a "Notice to Relocate," Mr. Langer intervened, insisting that I remain in Porter County. He submitted an Order to the Court stating that I was prohibited from residing anywhere outside of Porter County. Although the Judge did not sign the Order, they also did not dismiss it.

 

 

 

 

I did not have custody. They cannot stop me relocating

In my view, Mr. Langer's actions were intended to intimidate and harass, aiming to establish that the Court would not oppose his decisions. FULL RESPONSE TO NOTICE TO RELOCATE

5. In October 2020, I needed to journey to the UK to see my elderly father, who was not doing well.  Mr. Langer through the Court requested a copy of my father's medical records, even though the wasn't authorized to demand them and could not enforce that demand. When it became clear I would not comply with the Court Order.  Mr. Langer asked for a picture of my father in his hospital bed. 

 

 

 

 

FULL EMAIL EXCHANGE HERE

Eventually, my mother,  wrote to Langer

That did not work so we engaged their attorneys who sent a letter to Michael Langer. Explaining nicely NO. To which Langer replied

 

 

 

 

FULL RESPONSE FROM ATTORNEY HERE

7.  We proceeded to file for the removal of Magistrate Osan. Typically, when a judge is replaced, the change should take effect immediately. However, in January, my attorney emailed me that she had found while reviewing the case file that three weeks after she was supposed to step down, Magistrate Osan had an ex parte hearing. During this hearing, she instructed me to pay Mr. Langer $50,000 in fees along with $10,000 for the evaluation conducted by Dr. Jaffe, an evaluation that Mr. Langer was aware was fraudulent. She recused herself the very same day.  Mr. Langer with the help of Mr. Michael C. Handlon had set up the false evaluation. A Doctor when it was discovered recused himself. But to have the nerve to have a hearing to recover the fees his client had to pay to bribe the Doctor was beyond belief.

8. My father had a heart attack, and I went to the UK. Mr. Langer knew exactly what had happened and why I was going. He was to have emergency quadruple bypass surgery. It was the height of Covid. He was as usual been difficult, but I did not bite this time. Although he did demand certain Covid rules and restrictions that the UK government did not have. I told him this but he continued to demand them. Maybe a little to in love with his own power in Porter County. I am sure deep down he did not expect the United Kingdom’s Government to change the Covid rules and provide him with paperwork which was not part of their policy.  

My son’s mother had not allowed him to speak to speak to his grandparents since the change of custody and my son and his grandparents were incredibly close, vacations together every year, they would travel to the USA several times a year for long periods to see him, long skype calls every week. So the mothers refusal to allow them to speak to him was devastating to them. He was their only grandson. She has spent the last two years working hard on a pattern of Parental Alienation and Langer and Langer have got out of their way to help her. Even making decisions and over ruling Court Orders (with out going to Court), that is dealt with later.

My Father after his heart attack was scared. He wanted to see his grandson, so she texted to let my son’s mother know what had happened and that my father, who DOES NOT have a restraining order on him wanted to speak to grandson.  The restraining Order was issued for my mother by Michael Langer falsifying communication between my mother and him. Additionally below you will find Mr. Langer repeatedly accusing me of disseminating my sons medical information, knowing full well that my mother had done it to Doctors and key individuals to prevent further abuse from happening to grandson. Mr. Langer subornated PERJURY in Court when his client testified in Indiana that the Court in Illinois had issued the PO “of their own volition” yet the filing, which he has, shows she requested it.  At this point I should point out the my son’s mother is an Area Administrator for the Illinois Department of Child and Family Services and has a Masters in Psychology. So she knows right from wrong. 

The day we got my father home from hospital my mother was trying to get him to sleep. The phone rang and I heard her talking. But the voice on the other end was getting louder and abusive. Then I heard “Please stop my husband can hear you and he is getting upset I have just got him home from the hospital” The voice on the other end of the phone shouted loudly “then move into another FUCKING room” that voice was Michael Allen LANGER of the law firm Langer and Langer.

I took the phone and he was raging, started yelling at me (I had a lawyer, he should not have even been speaking to me)  demanding to know where I was, what I was doing why had I not paid him (What Magistrate Osan had awarded him, illegally) What followed was a bizarre exchange of emails. The reason the Magistrate Osan was included was because Mr. Langer had told me there as a trial over the money and I was there and he wants the money.  Trust me. I was not there.

 

 

 

 

“Franky Judge I am not sure what call he is talking about”?  So there was no call?

 

 

 

 

10 Minutes before he is discussing the call that he told Magistrate Osan he had no idea about 10 minutes later.

Below he now states he lied about recording the call that he had That would be the same call he told Magistrate Osan “Frank I have no idea ….”

 

 

 

 

If there was no call, what was he recording and why did I need to calm down. If there was no call what did he need to calm me down?

EMAIL EXCHANGE HERE

The case my ex filed was in Illinois, Mr.Langer is not licensed in Illinois and therefore knows he should not have made that call. He was paid to do it. And that call was nothing more than to harass a man he knew was scared and frail. That call was paid for by Bruce Campbell. Google him, Decatur Illinois, upstanding religious man that pays a lawyer, not licensed in a state, to call an old frail man, who he knew had a heart attack and threaten and harass his family.

I filed a complaint on him with the Disciplinary Commission office. They said, of all things he had done nothing wrong. I applied for a Protective Order for my parents. We did not get one but the Order is clear warning to Mr. Langer. Who then chose to contact them again in May 2024 and three days later deny EVER having contacted my parents.

The Reason Magistrate Osan is associated with this was because she awarded him the money, he then lied to her and she DID NOTHING.

And this is the latest form of harassment because he was told to turn over my son’s medical.  And he does not want to do that.

 

 

 

 

Magistrate Buckley Superior Court 4 Judge, Valparaiso, Indiana

Magistrate Buckley followed Magistrate Osan. Magistrate Buckley was the one that really violated my civil rights and according to Michael Langer, because he was complaining about it Porter County became engaged in a legal suite with United States Justice Department for violations of my civil rights. There was a hearing in August 2021. No mention was made of my passport. However, Mr. Langer knew I was in Mexico City on Business and was travelling extensively for business. He also knew I needed the ability to return to England quickly for my father. At the end of the hearing, he quickly volunteered to write up the Order for Judge. Mr. Langer and his colleague Ms. Tuefel decided to include in the Order that I must surrender my passport.

 

 

 

 

I had committed no crime, was wanted for now crime and have the right to free movement. I initially thought that the Judge had signed it by mistake. But was informed that Clerks read the orders to ensure accuracy of the Order to what was agreed in Court. So Magistrate Buckley, knowingly violated my civil rights at the request of Langer and Langer. Mr. Langer then, in a late-night email demanding it:

 

 

 

 

Note that the email is send late at night again. Not only is Mr. Langer demanding I follow an Order that violates my civil rights but that I do it ASAP.

THIS WAS followed up by  SUBPOENA demanding I surrender my passport along with issuing a subpoena. He issued a legal document as an officer of Court to intentionally violate my civil rights.  Spoke just so we are clear. Mr Langer is an Office of the Court and has the right to issue Subpoena and he issued one as a Office of the Court to remove the passport  of a foreign national. One who he included in a custody agreement that his son could not have his nationality. I filed a civil rights violation with the Justice Department and Magistrate Buckley recused himself.

Also, in the Order you will note that is says that communications between my son and I were to resume. Mr. Langer and his client had decided, without any reason that it was “Unhealthy” for my son and I to communicate. NO COURT HEARING, NO EVIDENCE, JUST MR. LANGER DECIDING HOW IT IS.  IF HE WAS TO ASK THE COURT FOR AN EXAM I AM SURE HE KNEW HE NEEDED TO GO TO COURT TO STOP COMMUNICATION

They did not go to Court they just arbitrarily decided.  And the Court was fine with it.  Would not allow any emergency hearings. This is a regular occurrence with Michael Langer. If he does not like a Court Order or does not want to follow it. He just decides what he is going to do and do it. Does not go to Court, just over rules the Court. That’s actual against his ethics and for which he can be disbarred. But no Judge in my case has ever sanction him, admonished him or anything. Mr. Langer and his client did not allow communication with my son. This took years to restore.

In subsequent hearings in front of Magistrate Wright who is aware that Mr. Langer and Ms. Tuefel had intentionally violated my rights with Ordering my passport removed he likes to show that he has full immunity from the Court by asking to see my passport. Again, trying to be intimidating.  My reply is you can. "At the British Consulate in Chicago, they want to know what you tried to confiscate it”. He is too much of a coward to go and do that.

Magistrate Buckley violated. My civil rights. I could fight back and did. But that was not his first time. That was not his first time was. Magistrate Buckley previously received Admonishment.  The Porter County Republicans neglected to mention on their bio of him on their website That aside from what he did to me he was Admonished for:

1. Modified defendants’ bonds without a motion from the prosecution or notice to the defendants.
2. Violated the defendants’ due process rights 
3. Repeatedly failed to comply with the law on issuance of bonds (scofflaw) 
4. Failed to act in a manner promoting public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. 
5. Failed to avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.
By acting on his own in modifying the defendants’ bond, Judge Buckley denied defendants an opportunity to receive notice of the revocation and an opportunity to respond and oppose those allegations.
6. Failed to perform all duties of judicial office fairly and impartially.
7. Failed to accord every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding the right to be heard according to the law (aka, due process)

Why would they assign him to the presiding judge for Porter County’s Mental Health Restoration Court.   He could not preside over those that could fight back, so we allow him to work with those that will struggle!!!!!!   Nice Job reporting "Valpo Life"

MAGISTRATE BUCKLEY and ENFORCEMENT of COURT ORDER.

Magistrate Buckley ruled that my son could communicate with his grandfather. If you read the transcript of the hearing you will read that I asked the Court for the call to happen before a certain time due to the time difference. Ms. Tuefel and Mr. Langer intentionally omitted that. They were the ones that volunteered to write up the Order.

 

 

 

 

The following are text exchanges between my elderly father and initially my son’s mother on setting up time to talk. Only one call happened. She left my father waiting by the phone ALL weekend. The fact. Mr. Langer and Ms. Tuefel intentionally committed the call time stipulated by Magistrate Buckley was just, in my opinion another way to intimidate and abuse. I draw the readers attention back to Mr. Langer's abuse of my father and parents and lies to the Court Appointed Evaluator regarding not contacting them.

 

 

 

 

* Indicated when my son's mother's husband took over communication. Note the Order said she had to do it and in Court it was stipulated to happen before 12:00 noon Chicago time.  12:15 is stating who is in charge and you will note from the text the next day that no one called my father. They just made him wait.

The text was dated 7th September. My Motion for Rule to Show case on not allowing my father to Speak to his grandson until September 8th.

 

 

 

 

Magistrate Buckleys response, received the 9th of September, on something on the 8th states:

 

 

 

 

1. "No standing".My father was following Magistrate Buckleys ruling. How can he have no standing on a ruling issue by a sitting Magistrate? THE MAGISTRATE THAT IS NOW SAYING NO RULING!!
2. How is asking asking Magistrate Buckley to enforce an order that he signed "Immaterial, Scandalous etc" OR IS IT IMMATERIAL AND SCANDALOUS FOR WANTING IT ENFORCED. OR IS IT JUST BECAUSE ELDERLY MAN WANTS TO TALK TO GRANDSON.
3. Magistrate struck a filing on enforcing an Order he signed and Ordered.
4. Mr. Langer years later did inform me that Magistrate Buckley had "no right" to Order what he did and he had "Told" him so. EXPARTE HEARING!!!

What happened next sanctioned by Magistrate Buckley of which Mr. Langer was informed was nothing more than abuse of the love a dedicated grandfather has for his grandson.  The Order Striking and Not allowing my Father to speak to his grandson was dated 8th September 2021: On September 12th 2021 My Ex wife husband started to email my father:

 

 

 

 

 

Note is was 4 minutes after the supposed NOON Deadline

I AM AT MY LIMIT WITH LOADING IMAGES SO IT WILL BE LINKS GOING FORWARD.

My ex-wfes husband then followed up with another text:

"Unfortunately for you (Your son) prefer not to communicate according to the Order. He will not be subjected to another inappropriate call with you. No Call today". TEXT IMAGE HERE

What is worse on the 19th of September 2021 called the police thousands of miles away and filed a false police report on a frail man.  There had been no contact and in fact there had never been any communication between my son and his grandfather. Something Magistrate Buckley and Mr. Langer are fully aware of.  POLICE REPORT. If I cannot be intimidated and threatened then attack my frail father.

We had numerous issues with my ex-wife’s husband and his anger management issues and abuse. It has been reported to the Guardian Ad Litem Michael C. Handlon numerous times. Incidents included turning. up and pick up and drop offs and brandishing a gun, attacking my son and I in a store (To which my ex testified it was me but the surveillance footage shows it was him and communication between my ex and shows me complaining about it) Mr. Handlon response was that I “spoke to Christina and Mr. Langer and it never happened”  This links shows that my ex’s husband was arrested for multiple counts of assault with a deadly weapon.

The extent to which that period what so intense with Mr. Langer which included threats to me (which over time became so bad that I chose to relocate out of Chesterton, Indiana especially under Magistrate Buckley)  We understood clearly the corruption inside Porter County would never offer us protection let alone my son the Justice and life he deserved that we had to file for protection in another state where his mother lived.  PETITION HERE

After Magistrate Buckley recused himself the cased bounced from Judge to Judge each declining the case. This is where those that declined are no different than the ones that passionately supported Michael Langer. There was a child involved. Their obligation was to administer the law, the moral obligation to my son was to ensure Justice was upheld. Just by the filings in the case you can see that a planned and persistent action of parental alienation was going on. Their moral obligation to Porter County was to step in. Not run and hide. The lawyers of Porter County who know what Michael Langer does do have a cross to carry. Their obligation to their oath is to report unethical behavior.  I have heard many complain about him. I not heard of one standing by their oath and reporting him.

Magistrate Wright

Magistrate Wright had to come from Benton County. No other Judge would touch the case. I had expectations of Justice.  He has turned out to be the worst one of all.

I followed, but knowing Mr. Langer I needed someone highly qualified. I love my son more anything. When he lived me we were together all the time, where one went the other went. Dr Ross is the head of Indiana Psychotic Licensing Board. No one higher:

The result was this: 

He provided a valid protocol, indicating no attempts to exaggerate positive personality characteristics. He did not score similarly to adjudicated physical child abusers. If there are any concerns with regard to his potential for engaging in abuse against Jaxon, this test would be helpful in ascertaining such.  Based upon the aforementioned, I do not see any diagnosable psychological conditions which would directly interfere with his ability to meet with his son. Across all three measures provided to him, the protocols were valid and interpretable, indicating the absence of psychopathology. With regard to the potential for engaging in physical abuse, the CAPI would indicate a very low potential for such. 

Basically a normal 

The Court had insisted on some ridiculous parameters for the Evaluation. In essence Mr. Langer had approval of who was a to be used. Just as he did with the Parental evaluation under Dr. Jaffe.  Which has ended up in civil court for Wire Fraud Charges.  Dr. Jaffe was not licensed in Indiana. I followed the parameters, unfortunately my attorney at the time did not. When it was submitted to Court he had it thrown out and Magistrate Wright was quick to state "I DID NOT READ IT".  And quickly ordered another one. What followed was the most insane behavior of a Court and law firm that I have ever seen: False accusations and statements just pure insanity. I kept filing in Court to show they were lying and begging the Court to intercede.  So Langer and Langer asked the Court to restrict my filings: Court Agreed: This came after months and months of harassment, intimidation false statements by Langer and Langer to produce a negative evaluation.I found a way round by noticing the Court of things Langer and Langer were doing in Court: So then they filed to have me put a bond up of $10,000.  Which Magistrate Wright is willing to hear. However he will NOT hear any of my attempts to stop the actions of Langer and Langer.

Michael Langer and Kayleen Tuefel are now under investigation by the  INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION:   Magistrate Wright may well let him get away with everything but there is more than enough evidence in that filing:  MY RESPONSE.

The crux of the Evaluation was that the Therapist wanted to see my son’s medical. Langer and Langer did not want it seen. Mr. Langer had emailed me in late 2020 and stated "You did not know how sick your son was" He was not sick and that can be seen by the GAL report. Mr. Langer was fully aware of the existence of possible Munchhausen and went to extremes to have the GAL's avoid medical review. 

Christine Otterbacher refused, in writing, to print one off  because is was too long and upside down (It was an PDF file, select all ROTATE!!!) She only reviewed one Doctors and that was the one Mother gave, not the other ten she had been shipping to.

With Micheal C. Handlon as GAL I went to Department of Child Services, undertstandly the abuse my son had been through was no where near on the charts for them to be involved. However it was concerning enough that DCFS asked to speak to him as Guardian Ad Litem.  He did not call them no matter how many reminders I sent. 

My son was a healthy educated fun adorable  little boy, playing and acting like every other boy of his age an excelling in school. With lots of friends. The GAL report stated "If mother has another chance he is sure she will do good". RIGHT: Take him way from that because he was excelling.

Within a week she had purchased new medical insurance and not used mine.

Two weeks in, my son was back on allergy medication.

Six months in:

• Prozac, Malatonin, Zyrtec, Flonase, Miralax, Vitamin
• And none of the Doctors have his history have been read.
• LINK

There were two Guardian Ad Litem: Michael C. Handlon and Christina Otterbacher. I am pro se in the case which means I am to be copied on all correspondence between Langer and Langer and the Court Appointed Evaluator, Langer and Langer are aware of this. This email, which I am NOT copied on states that there is a third Guardian Ad Litem report. 

When my son went to live with his mother he was a healthy little boy on no medication. She had, in his time with her, previously:

1. Stated he had allergies and medicated him for them 

                                 

                                            Thursday, May 9, 2024

                COURT APPOINTED EVALUATOR RECUSES HERSELF

 "I wanted to inform everyone that I will be sending the judge a request to recuse myself from your case. The evaluation process has been increasingly impacted by the contention between Richard and the Langer Law Firm, and I am being drawn into issues adjacent to my role as specified in the court order for Richard's evaluation. I am not able to remain impartial at this point and believe removing myself from the case is in the best interest of both parties. At this time, I would like to politely ask that I be removed from ongoing email communications. Any requests for email correspondence received during the duration of this evaluation process must be made by court order."

FULL EMAIL

            

                           THIRD COURT ORDER ON MEDICAL

                                       Thursday, May 2, 2024

Magistrate Wright issues his third order on release of medical "Turned over within 10 days"

ORDER

                                        Thursday, May 2, 2024

Ms Tuefel files in Court for payment.  Her filing is yet again trying to avoid producing the medical records. Her filing states that the evaluation is complete. It is not. The evaluator had requested records in November 2023. That should have been delivered in November 2023.  She states "Dr. S- I have copied you as the order discusses payment for the eval. If/when Richard pays, please let us know!"

FILING​

Ms. Tuefel email to Evaluator

                                         Thursday, May 2, 2024

Magistrate Wright grants Langer and Langer a continuance on a hearing scheduled for May 9th where Judge would have been informed that the records were not released per the Order and therefore Evaluation had not been completed. Ms. Tuefel in her filing led Magistrate Wright to believe this was the "sole" reason why the evaluation had not been completed:

ORDER

The reason these hearings are necessary is that Magistrate Wright has limited my filings and when I do file, nothing is granted and he NEVER reads the filings. This is evident on the fact that On 10 May Magistrate. Wright issued an Order to have "status hearing" I also filed on May 5th that the Evaluator wants to speak to Magistrate Wright. This is further proved in a May 6th email from Ms. Tuefel where she states " you would note that one of the items set for the continued May 9th hearing was our request for further filing restrictions against you . Magistrate Wright granted their wish with the Order for hearing but also stated "All other pending motions are taken under advisementI until further order of the Court;"  Magistrate Wright makes no mention of granting ANY Leave of Court I had submitted which included requests to file Motions to Compel, Leave of Court to stop Langer and Langer lying and interfering too the evaluation (Dealt with later). The fact is not only did I stand up to the systematic corruption of The Bench and Langer and Langer in Porter County, I am also filing Pro Se and am a Foreign National. Racism plays in here I am sad to say. Included in the Custody Agreement, signed off by Magistrate Osan, negotiated by my Attorney John Rhame states My son ": does not want t be a British Citizen and should not have a UK Passport". HE WAS 12. NO ONE TALKED TO HIM AND ASKED HIM. 

                                            Friday, May 3, 2024

                                             9:47 am Central 

Evaluator acknowledges receipt of "Two Orders"

"Given the court has granted my receipt of the documents I previously requested, including the child's medical and mental health records, I will include those in the evalua?on and revise the evaluation based on any findings. Once that occurs, I will re-invoice Richard for payment of the evaluation" SHE ALSO STATES: "If continued disagreement. or confusion over these records or my report occurs, it may be best to request a brief phone or zoom call with the judge, all attorneys, and myself to gather his direct authority on these matters so my work can effectively"

EMAIL 

                                            Friday, May 3, 2024

                                             11:18 am Central 

Ms Tuefel starts to disagree.

"In one pleading, Richard even suggested he may have to redo tests again if the Court didn’t rule on the issue of “medical records”, which I have no record of you ever requesting. This was obviously incredibly misleading to the Court" She was informed by the evaluator that tests have a limited time span. Logic then states you would have to redo them. I did NOT mislead the Court

"the Court was simultaneously unaware that you notified us that the evaluation was complete, it just needed to be paid for in order for us to receive the report" it was not complete. The Evaluator, as can be seen from her response to the two orders needed the medical records.

"After receiving the 4/30/24 Order, it became clear to us that the Court believed the hold up had something to do with information being provided to you, when in reality it was Richard’s failure to pay for the evaluation/report" Incorrect the hold up was the release of the medical records. So the evaluation could be completed.  Ms Tuefel was already informed on January 30th why they were required and several other emails.

"but I think this was because Richard didn’t mention this fact in any of his pleadings" I have no filed in any pleadings because Langer and Langer filed to have my right to file in Court limited!!!!

"In previous communications with you, you have indicated that dragging out an evaluation is generally". Her opening line was "Richard even suggested he may have to redo tests again if the Court didn’t rule on the issue of “medical records”, which I have no record of you ever requesting."  There was no record of requesting but she clearly understands they have a limited time span and acknowledges she was informed .

"In previous communications with you, you have indicated that dragging out an evaluation is generally considered non beneficial. This is why we notified you back on February 2, 2024, in response to your request that we do so, that we would like for you to just move forward with completing the report absent the records, which you subsequently did"

February 22nd: Magistrate Wright handed to complete authority to may evaluation to a private law firm which is on the other side of Custody dispute? Or does Langer and Langer feel they have the authority to supersede the Courts Authority?

The evaluation was not finished see Evaluators email regarding the two orders!!

EMAIL

                                            Friday, 3rd, May, 2024

                                                        3:30 pm

Ms Tuefel to me states: "The order I attached to the below e mail says nothing about us providing information. Just that you are to pay for the evaluation within 10 days. The report has been completed since mid-March.  Dr. Szerlong told both of us in mid-February that she didn’t need to delay the report's completion to review any additional information". She is correct. it says NOTHING. The order requiring the medical records is due 3 days before payment. It also does not say that Medical records should not be provided. It does not say that order supersedes the others.  So how and where does Ms. Tuefel believe that it says NO to medical?

FULL EMAIL

                                      Saturday, 4th May. 2024

Evaluator asks the speak to Magistrate Wright. (Note as of May 16th he still has not acknowledged my filing on this)

EMAIL

                                        Sunday, 5th May, 2024

Mr. Langer contacts my parents pretending its a mistake. Never calls me Richard and the email address was manually loaded. Its not in his address book. He knows how frail my father is and he knows he has been warned by a Judge in Porter County to NEVER DO IT AGAIN. He has become desperate because the evaluator now wants to speak to Judge and he has no control and Magistrates Wrights ability to help him behind scenes has gone because another professional is asking the Court for clarification.  MORE IMPORTANTLY HE KNOWS THE TRUTH WILL COME OUT . HIS EMAIL IN LATE 2020 ASKING ME "WHY I DID NOT KNOW HOW SICK MY SON WAS"  WILL SHOW LIES IN THE MEDICAL HISTORY AND FAKE SYMPTOMS TO HAVE HIM DRUGGED AND THE IMPACT ON ALL THE PLAYERS IN THIS WILL BE SIGNIFICANT.

EMAIL

                                    Monday May, 6th, 2024

Ms. Teufel forwards an email I sent to her to the evaluator, she has no reahtoric now. Does not even make a comment. The fact that the evaluator wants everything by the book and they cannot sway her maybe having an impact.  Email is on the fact that I am not paying for an incomplete evaluation

EMAIL

                                         Monday May, 6th, 2024

5:21 pm Mr. Langer emails the evaluator: 

• "I hope you have come to realize that Richard's allegations regarding both my and Kaylee's ethical practices are nothing but lies having no factual basis" NOTHING TO DO WITH THE EVALUATION BUT HE KNOWS HIS YEARS OF ETHICAL VIOLATIONS, FELONIES, ACTS OF INTIMIDATION, PERJURY, JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT ARE NOW PLAYING A PART IN THIS. IF NOT WHY EMAIL?
• "His lies and false filings do nothing more than take up the valuable time of the courts and others" I HAVE NOT LIED. THE EVIDENCE ALREADY HERE SHOWS THAT AND FORTHCOMING WILL SHOW MORE.
• "Moreover, his comment about me contacting his parents is false, yet he continues with his false narratives." HE EMAILED THEM THE PREVIOUS DAY AND AS I HAVE SHOW IN APRIL 2021. BOTH TIMES TO HARASS AND INTIMIDATE THEM.

EMAIL                                           

                                      Wednesday, May, 8th, 2024

                                                 11:24 pm. CENTRAL

Mr. Langer CC's myself and the Evaluator on Interoffice communication between he and Ms Tuefel, he states "More lies from the both of them. You will recall Pauline, Richard's mother, had a Protective Order issued against her by the court in Illinois for harassing my client. The Protective Order remains in effect". This is in response to an email I sent the evaluator on the harassment my parents had endured at the hands of Mr. Langer. That file can be seen below here and it is extensive and horrifying. 

EMAIL:

My response to Mr. Langer.  This is an important issue because Mr. Langer and Ms. Tuefel has, since the request for medical records came about, reasoned with the Court that I had been the one who had shared the medical with my son's Doctors, social workers etc. His grandmother, my mother had done it because The GAL Michael C. Handlon had refused to talk to the Department of Child and Family Services as they had wanted. I am not posting the file because it contains medical.  But it does include acts of corporal punishment, emotional abuse, including. Ms Tuefel and Mr. Langer perjured themselves in assigning it to me to avoid releasing medical that shows abuse.  The response to the documents was very supportive

Coming Soon:

Second Court Order on Medical

First Court Order on Medical

Attempts to Manipulate or Taint Evaluation by Langer and Langer

These include:

• Communicating with Evaluator without CC'ing me:
• Ms. Tuefel presenting so called "Hacked emails" saying I am married the sister of a Jamaican drug dealer's sister. The dealer is serving life in Jail!!!
• Ms. Tuefel writing to Evaluator to ask if she has noticed my job title, then researching people in my company and their titles and thinking its an issue.
• I sent the historical medical to the evaluator. Ms. Tuefel made multiple glaring attempts to have her not read it. "Not relevant"!!!!

 

Judge DaBoer, Porter County

Magistrate DaBoer is notorious for a "off the record rants" I was interviewed at one stage by the Judicial Disciplinary commission because of them 

For my case she was very pro Langer and pro GAL, Michael Handlon.

We filed to change the GAL because of huge issues:

Wanted my son the leave school early to see his mother. School had to intervene and say NO. The school had to intervene with him numerous times.

My son wanted to try out for the school play GAL said NO, it would take time away from his mother.
The GAL told me six weeks after he had been hired that he would "Not speak (to me) again because I hated lawyers". He was the GAL!!!!
He argued that I could be at the meeting point for parental exchanges earlier because is was only 30 minutes away.  It was 2.5 hours.
Magistrate DaBoer refused to replace him. Her reason "He is a good man". 

In 2019 I had a business trip and a vacation. My parents came to stay. While I was away my son's mother was making disruptive phone calls to him and started to inform him his grandfather was coming to get him, my son had a fear of his grandfather because of corporal punishment, my ex wife had the same when she was a child. My son's mother stated they were going to take my son away for a few days. His fear caused issues at school. Ny the time I returned from my trip he had gnawed his thumb to the point it was bleeding. I asked the mother for an Itinerary. She refused. At a hearing later Magistrate DaBoer ruled Mother did not have to provide one, father did and threw me in jail. That was after she dismissed all my witnesses and allowed only Michael Langers

Magistrate DaBoer, at the request of Michael C. Handlon and Michael Langer ordered our only car to be sold. GAL did not care how my son was getting to school or after school activities. I remember clearly Michael Langer appearing at the hearing alongside Michael Handlon to "help him". he should not have been in attendance and that shows that Mr. Handlon was already colluding with Mr. Langer and Magistrate DaBoer was fine with that.

Dr Allen Jaffe was the unlicensed Therapist Michael C, Handlon said he found on the Internet to conduct thew evaluation. We had been given three to choose from: The two that were available were Dr. Paret and Dr Jaffe. Mr Langer stated that his client had called Dr. Paret over and over again but no answer. Dr. Paret had a different answer.  He clearly states that no one has been in contact with him.  Mr. Langer and his client lied. The GAL Michael C. Handlon was made aware. Yet Magistrate DaBoer only asked Mr. Handlon for Dr. Jaffe resume which would have shown where he was licensed, and it was NOT Indiana. Dr Jaffe then went on to commit wire fraud in the case and quit when I challenged an over excessive bill.

Magistrate DaBoer’s tirades “off the record” have no place in a Court room. I remember John Rhame stating she was not qualified to be a Judge having come from a small practice. But because of who her husband is it is a “Political Appointment”. I would hate to think the Governor of Indiana is putting unqualified Judges in place who are responsible for our children so that he can curry political favor.

 

Christina Otterbacher, Guardian Ad Litem.

Ms Otterbacher was the first Guardian As Litem. Her report lasted less than 12 months before my sons mother voluntarily returned custody to me.

GUARDIAN AD LITEM was appointed at the recommendation of Mr. Michael Langer respondent’s Lawyer. The final report recommended Joint custody.

Resignation:

One week prior to the hearing the GUARDIAN AD LITEM resigned to my lawyer. Mr. Martin. Martin did not play by Porter County rules. Mr Langer had a fear of that. To the point that Mr. Langer included in the first custody agreement that "I was to hold him harmless for his actions" a clear admission that he knows he breaks the law.

Ulferts of Ulferts Law. When notified that I would be seeking the return of the fees she had been paid $20,500 she informed my lawyer that if that was the case she was going to rule for custody to the mother under subpoena and not take into fact, medical abuse of my son by his mother, his mother’s prescription drug abuse and lack of co-operation.

THE FACT THAT SHE WAS WILLING TO CHANGE THE REPORT OF SHE DID NOT GET PAID FOR FINISHING AN INCOMPLETE REPORT SHOWS YOU THE VALUE, MS. OTTERBACHER AS A GAL PUTS ON THE WELL BEING OF A CHILD. CLEARLY THE CHILDS LIFE WITH HER IS FOR SALE.

1. GUARDIAN AD LITEM took 2 years and 5 months to write the report

2. GUARDIAN AD LITEM spelt child’s name wrong Jackson and not JAXON

3. GUARDIAN AD LITEM contacted every witness provided by mother and only contacted one of mine leaving off Mr. and Mrs. Ashley Wainwright, mutual friends of parents and Mr. Gary Hein, brother-in-law, both of whom would stipulate that mother should not have custody.

I cannot publish the GAL report. I can however publish the rebuttal which shows huge amounts of what I hoped I would be able to call negligence but based on Ms. Otterbacher's comments on recommending change of custody to sole unless she got paid. Ms. Otterbacher was intentionally keeping a business of selling kids with Mr. Langer alive:  Here is the REBUTTAL

 

Michael C. Handlon, Guardian Ad Litem

Judge Wright, Benton County

Judge DaBoer, Porter County

Parental Alienation

A decade of Langer and Langer

Dave Kasarda, CEO, Duneland YMCA

Mark Chamberlain. CAPtrust, Chesterton, Indiana.